If anyone enjoys ethnology (or looking at cool maps), try the quiz I made here! And I'll be making a series out of these, so be sure to check back in the future for more :)
Bantu is a language family, not an ethnicity. And it certainly isn't concentrated in Nigeria. In fact, nearly ALL Bantu speakers are south and east of Nigeria. Democratic Republic of the Congo probably has the most Bantu people.
Yes, this is correct. There are very few Bantu peoples in Nigeria. The ones that are there are immigrants from other parts of Africa or their descendants. Nigeria has a large number of ethnolinguistic groups from the Niger-Congo family, of which Bantu is also a part, so I can see why there would be confusion, but not all Niger-Congo speakers are Bantu. Like @beekash said, the DR Congo has the most people of the various Bantu ethnicities, at around 54 million. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_peoples https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo#Ethnic_groups
I'd recommend replacing Bantus with one of the specific ethnic groups in the Bantu family, as the rest of the answers (with the exception of Slavs) are specific ethnic groups.
Aborigines ('aboriginal' is an adjective and is considered by some to be mildly pejorative) can be the original inhabitants of anywhere. For example, the Ainu are sometimes referred to as the aboriginal people of Japan, and the Inuit the aboriginal people of Canada. The clue would have to be 'Australian Aborigines', which would kind of give the game away :o)
Yeah, what Wombat said. 'Aborigine' just means 'a person, animal, or plant that has been in a country or region from earliest times' - it comes from the Latin phrase 'ab origine' meaning 'from the beginning'. The Romans, using Latin, even called their predecessors 'Aborigines'.
Here in Australia, because there are SO many different group of indigenous peoples - several hundred, in fact - people used to refer to them just as Aborigines or Aboriginals, because our Constitution referred to them collectively as 'the aboriginal race'. These days, as PC is wont to call everything offensive, they are typically referred to as Indigenous Australians, which is not definitive enough for this quiz as it's a collective noun for the hundreds of ethnic groups native to the continent and surrounding islands.
So, 'Aborigine' or 'Aboriginal' (also without capitalisation) is a global term that can be used anywhere indicating anyone or anything.
There are hundreds of different aboriginal groups in Australia (though there used to be many more before European settlement), to group them all under the name 'aboriginals' is both incredibly vague and often considered insensitive. For the same reason, Australia has no official language, because to only choose one or two of the hundreds or just English would be insensitive.
The fact that they lived in different tribes doesn't necessarily make them different ethnic groups. It's kind of like modern people living in different towns.
You listed all this countries and forgot Bulgaria? Come on, we're right next to you. :-) On another note - the quiz is for the countries which have *the most* people from the ethnic group, not just any number of them.
You are being nice enough that I'm not sure if this is meant to be a correction or plea for adding alternative answers. Most of this is just in general, not to you specifically.
As stated, it is the largest absolute number of people for that ethnicity in one country, not proportion-based. For example, the highest proportions of Tamil and Jews may be in Sri Lanka and Israel respectively, and there is probably a more concentrated population of Slavs outside of Russia but since those countries have such large populations they take the top spot.
I remember hearing that China is emerging as a country with one of the largest Christian populations, even though it is a very small percentage. 1% of a billion is still 10 million people.
Although, the answer for Jews would be Israel, no matter which way you look at it. There are about 900,000 more Jews in Israel than in the USA, which has the second most (about 6.9m to 6m). Tamils in Sri Lanka are are 11.2% of population, in India it’s 5.9%, although the actual populations are 69+m in India, compared to just over 3m in Sri Lanka.
If you wanted to pick an equivalent for Sri Lanka (I.e, highest population total and by percentage) you can go for the Sinhalese, 16.2m and 75% of the population. There are less than 5000 of them in India.
Depends on what the definition of Jew is. Is it someone who practices the religion? Is it some who is full blooded Jew as an ethnicity or is 50% or 25% sufficient? Do you include Sephardic and Ashkenazic? I'm 2 generations away from anyone that was ever a member of a Temple but I am still Jewish by ethnicity and religious definition, but in no way would I think to identify as myself as Jewish. If asked my first response is I'm eastern European, German and British. I bet if you go really broad in your definition, the US would have over 10 million "Jews".
The Tamil people in Sri Lanka are actually originally from India, brought over by the Brits to the tea plantations to harvest the tea leaves. So, the biggest group of Tamil people is definitely in India
Yes, but Pashtuns have been living in Pakistan for as long as they have been in Afghanistan. However, in recent times, their numbers have skyrocketed due to refugees coming in from the Afghan Wars.
"skyrocketed"? theres 3 million registered refugees and the unregistered ones are most likely not higher than 1 mil so the afghan war doesn't make a big difference for the most part
As a percentage of the population, Pashtuns are much more prevalent in Afghanistan. 42% of their population is Pashtun, compared to only 15% in Pakistan (according to Wikipedia). However, Pakistan has a way larger population in general, so it happens to have more Pashtuns as an absolute number.
Tamilians is a linguistic group.Tamil is a language.Ethnic races of India are Aryans and Dravidians. Tamilians belong to Dravidians. I am a South Indian- a Dravidian.
Germanic people are an ethnic group. As are "Latins" and "Latinos." I've seen the term "Latin" before applied to anyone from a country where the majority speaks a Romance language, including those in Europe; Latino usually applies only to those from Latin America.
Pan-Slavic nationalism was at least one of the justifications for Russia's entry into WWI, and pan-Germanism was the basis of Hitler's claims on Austria and the Sudetenland. There's very recent European history with a basis in ethnic groupings like "Germanic."
To say that Germanic people are an ethnic group is to extend the scope of "ethnic" far beyond where it has any useful meaning, as it would include the English and people descended from them as well as the more obvious Scandinavians, Dutch and Afrikaners. Far too broad to qualify in practical terms as a single ethnic group. Indo-Europeans are an ethnic group by the dictionary definition, but no-one talks about them as such. So I agree that "Slav" may be too broad.
It seems to me that pan-Slav nationalism was one of those short-lived fads. The only real concrete examples were Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, and look what happened to them. I don't think there's much evidence they ever had any significant basis in reality.
I live in the DRC - Bantu is not an ethnic group. In Africa the term Bantu is a kind of umbrella category of ethnicities to distinguish between the majority of Africans in west, central, and southern Africa, from 'Nilotic people' in eastern Africa and around the horn. Hutus (one of the other answers) are part of the Bantu people. Tutsis are part of the Nilotic people. I'd recommend changing this question as 'Bantu' is not an ethnicity. Thanks
I recommend adding the 'Banyarwanda' to this group! They are not a particularly famous ethnic group; however, they are notorious for being the only ethnic group in Rwanda and that's pretty cool!
The dutch are not an ethnic group, it is merely a nationality. It is like saying americans are an ethnic group. They are not, they are just people that all happen to live in the usa.
you cóuld ve used frisians. If im not mistaken the country once was divived into frisians saxons and francs, though noone nowadays identifies with the latter too.
Though there is a real distinction between the people from the south of the country and the west or north.
That looks to me like a descriptive definition, not a prescriptive one (i.e. ethnicities would satisfy it but not everything that satisfies it is necessarily an ethnicity).
As a prescriptive definition it would be very simplistic indeed, failing to take account for example of how ethnicities can be mutually exclusive (eg ethnic Irish in England, who fit the definition for being ethnically English but aren't).
Virtually all linguists and most social scientists prefer descriptive definitions. Some in sociology and gender studies, etc do not, as they enjoy twisting words to attempt to mask or exclude their own prejudices.
It seems like you've included ethnicities which populate cross borders and just allowed 1 answer for them. Catalans mostly inhabit in Spain but their traditional home lies along Spain, Andorra and France. The Kurds inhabit across Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran. The Sami live across Norway, Sweden and Finland. The Pashtuns, though a significant minority in Pakistani NorthWestern frontier, but is the majority population in Afghanistan. While the Tamils' traditional homeland is Tamil Nadu region of India, their is a significant Tamil population in Northern Sri Lanka which the British brought in. These are some I found. Please take into account.
there are at least 2 mistakes in this. The most obvious one is the Slavs are a large ethnic group that populates much of eastern Europe, not just Russia. The Tamils are also found in Sri Lanka
The quiz requirement clearly says name the country with the largest population of these ethnic groups. There are far more Slavs in Russia and Tamils in India than any other country.
Funny and sad at the same time how there are more Pashtuns in Pakistan than Afghanistan, how there are more Mongolians in China than Mongolia, and how there are more Irish in the US than Ireland...
Weird that Dutch are not categorized as Germanic peoples in general, and yet Slavs are (the Dutch are just one example). We are many peoples, Slovaks, Russians, Ukrainians, Serbians... similar and yet different. If you want to make it challenging, you can find "tricky" Slavic peoples.
All the people arguing about how the names of these ethnic groups is too broad... it's near impossible to go down to the specific tribes or individual regions, or else no one would know them. It's not wrong to refer to groups as a whole...
Here in Australia, because there are SO many different group of indigenous peoples - several hundred, in fact - people used to refer to them just as Aborigines or Aboriginals, because our Constitution referred to them collectively as 'the aboriginal race'. These days, as PC is wont to call everything offensive, they are typically referred to as Indigenous Australians, which is not definitive enough for this quiz as it's a collective noun for the hundreds of ethnic groups native to the continent and surrounding islands.
So, 'Aborigine' or 'Aboriginal' (also without capitalisation) is a global term that can be used anywhere indicating anyone or anything.
Sami people are from Norway, Sweden and Finland.
Tamil people are mostly from Sri Lanka.
Magyars are from Hungary, my neighbours :)
Quiz is good, idea is good, just give us more options, it would be nice :)
As stated, it is the largest absolute number of people for that ethnicity in one country, not proportion-based. For example, the highest proportions of Tamil and Jews may be in Sri Lanka and Israel respectively, and there is probably a more concentrated population of Slavs outside of Russia but since those countries have such large populations they take the top spot.
I remember hearing that China is emerging as a country with one of the largest Christian populations, even though it is a very small percentage. 1% of a billion is still 10 million people.
If you wanted to pick an equivalent for Sri Lanka (I.e, highest population total and by percentage) you can go for the Sinhalese, 16.2m and 75% of the population. There are less than 5000 of them in India.
It seems to me that pan-Slav nationalism was one of those short-lived fads. The only real concrete examples were Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, and look what happened to them. I don't think there's much evidence they ever had any significant basis in reality.
you cóuld ve used frisians. If im not mistaken the country once was divived into frisians saxons and francs, though noone nowadays identifies with the latter too.
Though there is a real distinction between the people from the south of the country and the west or north.
/eTHˈnisədē/
noun
the fact or state of belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.
As a prescriptive definition it would be very simplistic indeed, failing to take account for example of how ethnicities can be mutually exclusive (eg ethnic Irish in England, who fit the definition for being ethnically English but aren't).