The percentages are a little weird. For example, in Costa Rica mestizos are counted, but in Mexico most are not. In the United States, some people of mixed descent are counted, but others are not. So, take the numbers with a grain of salt, but I think the list of countries would be the same no matter how you slice the numbers.
The"limit" between white and black people (and all other variations) can be very different between countries. I think I read it somewhere on Quora that a very light-skinned person was considered African-American in US, while a rather dark-skinned Brazilian was offended when called black.
Another problematic quiz with this definition of "descent"... I *guarantee* you that very VERY VERRRY high percentages of people in places like... Turkey, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Kazakhstan, etc. have at LEAST one ancestor who lived in Europe. And probably a lot more than that. Places like Mexico (which makes the list but much too low) and the Philippines (which doesn't make the list but ought to)... realistically it's gotta be close to 100%. You meet people both places who claim to be 100% indigenous but I want to see their DNA test because that's almost certainly baloney.
I guarantee you it's much more than that. In addition to the fact that Anatolia was part of the Roman or Eastern Roman Empire for 1500 years, the Ottomans were importing wives from Ukraine, Russia, Bulgaria and the rest of the Balkans for 5 centuries after that. It has to be something like 95% or more.
To be fair, even though many people in all of those countries listed have European ancestry, I'm guessing they are still mostly descended as the ethnicity they identify as. For example, even if there are Turkish people with great-great grandparents or something from Europe, if the vast majority of their ancestors are Turkish, it makes sense for them to identify as such (although I'll admit I know little about this topic so I could be wrong).
That being said, Mexico should definitely be higher up because most "mestizos" come from centuries of interracial marriages. That's possibly true of some of the other Latin American countries here.
Plus, it's worth pointing out that most people from most "racial" groups in America have European ancestors, including Hispanics, African-Americans, and Native Americans. If you take those peoples into account and not just "white people", the US's percentage would probably go up.
Turkish people today are more European than Mexicans are. Like I said, the Ottomans were importing people from Eastern Europe to populate their cities and harems in Anatolia for five centuries. Not to mention that prior to the Ottoman conquest the country was Greek/Roman Byzantine, and had been at least partly if not mostly Greek going all the way back to the 20th century BC. I'm confident that there's not even a single person there whose family history goes back more than a handful of generations who doesn't have many European ancestors. Google "genetic map of Europe" and you can see that the unique Haplogroup markers found in contemporary Turkish DNA are the small minority versus the ones that they share with most other Europeans.
That would be perfectly fine with me. (counting virtually all African-Americans as of European descent; because they are) I'm not irrationally married to the idea of trying to divide people up into mythical racial groups and pretend like they are completely distinct from one another the way other people are. Race is a lie. We are all part of the same family. And what I said about Filipinos is accurate, even if your 5% figure is also accurate. 5% is a pretty big amount to dismiss out of hand like it doesn't exist.
Many Cubans (if not a majority) look like Fidel Castro. It is a misconception that most Cubans are black or multiracial. Other than Puerto Rico, Cuba is the only Caribbean country where there is virtually no interracial marriage.
You should do another quiz like this but expand it to include more countries. For example there are a very large number of Russians in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, there are many many Italians and Spaniards in Uruguay and New Zealand has lots of white people as well.
Also, your map doesn't show that you have been to Venezuela even though you're from there. I strongly suggest you add Venezuela to the countries/territories you have been to. (because you've been there)
I very highly doubt Australia is 90% European, coming from an Australian. At the very most I'd say 80%. In Melbourne and Sydney a huge proportion of the population isn't of European descent, and these cities alone make roughly 2/5 of the country's population.
80% is likely a very good guess. Just based on preliminary research, on the last Australian census 17% of people recorded ancestry from Asia, 3% from the Middle East and North Africa, and 1% from Sub Saharan Africa.
In general, this quiz makes not too much sense...
That being said, Mexico should definitely be higher up because most "mestizos" come from centuries of interracial marriages. That's possibly true of some of the other Latin American countries here.
Plus, it's worth pointing out that most people from most "racial" groups in America have European ancestors, including Hispanics, African-Americans, and Native Americans. If you take those peoples into account and not just "white people", the US's percentage would probably go up.
If you count someone with 2% European ancestry as being of European descent, you have to count all African Americans as well.
http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/quickstats-culture-identity/ethnic-groups-NZ.aspx
- The most useful clarification ever.