I guess it depends on your age. Aside from the obvious Hitler, Napoleon and Mussolini, I can remember all of these being in power except for Sulla (obviously). I also couldn't place Trujillo for the life of me, though I knew his name. The rest were easy only because the news was full of them in their heydays.
It would be a good quiz to see the "retirement" plan for each of these dictators. How many besides Sulla stepped away from power voluntarily and how many were carried out feet first?
Only Castro stepped down voluntarily (to be succeeded by his own brother), Mugabe is still power. Mao, Tito, Duvalier, Kim, Franco and Brezhnev all governed until they died of more or less natural causes. The rest (except Sulla) were all either kicked out or assassinated.
Pinochet was actually the only one who called for elections and gave the power in a peaceful way. Castro instead died like a simple banana-country dictator
Okay. So how random is Sulla. There isn't a person on the list, except for Napoleon, who is pre-20th century. Then all of a sudden Sulla, a guy who was born before Christ.
Sulla was a dictator, so it's fair to include him in the quiz. What struck me is that he is the only one who appears without given name and THAT makes him look a bit out of line. For future reference: Lucius Cornelius Sulla.
The quiz doesn't claim to have all the dictators, just a selection. Besides, seeing as it already contains Brezhnev it would be silly to also include Stalin and Lenin as they were from the same regime in the same country, just at different times
I would also have expected Stalin, more than any other Russian, compared to him all others were harmless and Brezhnev was definitely not one of the worst.
Sacrebleu! You put Napoleon on zis list, zis is an outrage, Monsieur!
Sulla and Napoleon are indeed dictators but more in the old Roman way: all powers to one person so he can end the internal troubles of a country. No genocide, no mass-killing of own citizens, or at least not more than any French king at least...
Alongside several other people, this comment defends someone from the calumny of being a dictator, associated with repression, imprisnoment without trial, murder and genocide. Yet the quiz doesn't do anything of the sort. It doesn't say "these people were evil monsters" it simply describes them as dictators, which they all were, and asks you to name the country they ruled, which they all did. Lucassar actually says "Yes, he was a dictator, but of the good sort". Nobody said any different. The quiz isn't making any judgements, it's all in the eye of the beholder.
Napoleon is far from the worst on here, but he's more flawed than a lot of people think. His government reinstated slavery and led a pretty brutal response to the Haitian Revolution that involved massacres and (I believe?) the first use of poisonous gas in conflict. Also, while he didn't mass kill civilians on purpose, his wars did probably kill several million people, including Frenchmen and civilians, and really didn't serve any purpose other than to make him more powerful.
At the same time, I'll acknowledge that he made many positive reforms, such as Napoleonic Code, and that he did bring stability to France for a while. I'd still call him an "enlightened despot," but even if he was a good ruler I don't think that made him a good person.
When Hitler was born Germany has only been around for about 20 years. Just because Austria didn't happen to be one of the countries that unified into Germany right at the beginning, that doesn't mean Hitler wasn't German. Nationality is not something that is fixed, and when Germany annexed Austria Hitler was also leader of Austria. "Germany" and "Austria" we're not at that time fixed concepts like "the USA" or "Canada" are today. But anyway the quiz does ask for the country they ruled, not their nationality, and Hitler ruled Germany.
I thought putting Sulla was really cool. His title was officially Dictator (said in a Latin accent, of course). It would also have been appropriate to put Julius Caesar, whom everybody thinks was the first Roman Emperor, which he wasn't.
I have a problem referring to the USSR leaders (except Stalin) as dictators as they had to answer to the central committee and dictators answer to no one.
The average score is 14 so yes, I would say that is good for a 12 yo. Definitely not bad. Most of the people on this site are older than that, and could have heard of several from the news. Only some are covered in history classes.
So anyone saying getting 11 is bad for a 12 yo, has got some issues. (inferiority or superiority.. always hard to tell..)
even it it was bad, no need to rub it in someone's face.
I doubt I would have done that well on a similar quiz when I was 12. Mubarak and Gaddafi would have still been in power but I doubt I could have named them.
Arguably, Rome has been a country longer than Italy has. You had the Roman Kingdom (752-509 BC), Roman Republic (509-27 BC), Roman Empire (27 BC - 285 AD), Western Roman Empire (285-476), and the Papal States (754-1870). The Kingdom of Italy incorporated Rome in 1871 and in 1946 became the Italian Republic. Rome was a country for either 2,344 years or 1,228 years if you don't want to count the Papal States as Rome. Italy has been a country for 160 years.
You may want to give your definition of a dictator, you clearly mix many different ages and it is historically wrong to put aside Hitler or Mussolini with older leaders like Napoleon or Sulla or with more recent ones like Saddam Hussein.
This list does not make any sense, if you just take the fact that power was in the hands of a unique person you could put in there any king in history like Henry VIII or king Richard and I'm quite sure you wouldn't describe them as dictators though.
Why would the quiz need to define "dictator"? It's a common word. I teach political studies, though, so I'll go over what I know. Dictatorships are typically ruled by a single authoritarian leader, but in some cases they can be oligarchical. Most dictatorships today control the political process and media to the point that there is no challenge to their power. Dictators today also often have a cult of personality. The term dictator has historically been used simply to mean a single person who has achieved power in non-democratic or monarchical ways (i.e., no vote and no longstanding tradition to explain their power). There can be bad dictators, despots, and good leaders, commonly called benevolent dictators. Lee Kuan Yew is probably the best example of a benevolent dictator. Also, keep in mind that there are different forms of dictatorship. Totalitarianism is an extreme type of dictatorship that more or less tries to control the lives and beliefs of its citizens.
I think the quiz should define what is a dictator because it gives a list of people who are not commonly called dictators.
For instance, were Queen Victoria or Louis XVI dictators ? It quite matches your definition and thus could be put in this quiz but I'm not sure everybody would call them that way.
Moreover, you're giving a definition of a dictator "today", pointing out that mixing areas by using a single term for all these people is a nonsense.
He was an emperor/king. There where a lot of kings and queens with absolute power over their country in history, french, british/english, dutch, swedish, spanish, chinese, russian, persian, egyptian, babylonian,... the list is endless.
A lot of them lead their countries into wars which brought destruction and despair over their citizen.
Napoleon did not succeed the throne because of longstanding tradition, and is therefore not a monarch. He took power by force in a coup d'etat, which is probably one of the most dictatorial ways to come to rule a country.
So I made a tongue in cheek comment in reply to someone comparing one dictator favorably to another, get insulted by someone else in response, then reply to this comment without insulting even if with harsh words, and our comments get deleted. Except the original comment I replied to. Well done. I guess it's ok to defend fascists here, but not to call out the people who do it.
Tito was not a dictator, he was a president for life. In Socialist Yugoslavia the people ruled, so it doesn't even make sense that he is a dictator. Please fix this attrocity that is written in here to tie Tito, the man who saved his people and singlehandedly liberated and made one of the most powerful nations of the 20th century, together with monsters like Hitler or Mussolini.
That, plus the fact that he was basically hand-picked as his father's successor, certainly sounds like a dictator to me.
Sulla and Napoleon are indeed dictators but more in the old Roman way: all powers to one person so he can end the internal troubles of a country. No genocide, no mass-killing of own citizens, or at least not more than any French king at least...
At the same time, I'll acknowledge that he made many positive reforms, such as Napoleonic Code, and that he did bring stability to France for a while. I'd still call him an "enlightened despot," but even if he was a good ruler I don't think that made him a good person.
Great quiz though!
So anyone saying getting 11 is bad for a 12 yo, has got some issues. (inferiority or superiority.. always hard to tell..)
even it it was bad, no need to rub it in someone's face.
Also is there any reason why Stalin was omitted from this quiz?
Rome was a country, arguably.
2. Yugoslavia - Serbia
3. Zaire - DRC
4. Rome - Italy
This list does not make any sense, if you just take the fact that power was in the hands of a unique person you could put in there any king in history like Henry VIII or king Richard and I'm quite sure you wouldn't describe them as dictators though.
For instance, were Queen Victoria or Louis XVI dictators ? It quite matches your definition and thus could be put in this quiz but I'm not sure everybody would call them that way.
Moreover, you're giving a definition of a dictator "today", pointing out that mixing areas by using a single term for all these people is a nonsense.
A lot of them lead their countries into wars which brought destruction and despair over their citizen.
Would you describe all of them as dictators?