When Hitler was born Germany has only been around for about 20 years. Just because Austria didn't happen to be one of the countries that unified into Germany right at the beginning, that doesn't mean Hitler wasn't German. Nationality is not something that is fixed, and when Germany annexed Austria Hitler was also leader of Austria. "Germany" and "Austria" we're not at that time fixed concepts like "the USA" or "Canada" are today. But anyway the quiz does ask for the country they ruled, not their nationality, and Hitler ruled Germany.
I thought putting Sulla was really cool. His title was officially Dictator (said in a Latin accent, of course). It would also have been appropriate to put Julius Caesar, whom everybody thinks was the first Roman Emperor, which he wasn't.
I have a problem referring to the USSR leaders (except Stalin) as dictators as they had to answer to the central committee and dictators answer to no one.
The average score is 14 so yes, I would say that is good for a 12 yo. Definitely not bad. Most of the people on this site are older than that, and could have heard of several from the news. Only some are covered in history classes.
So anyone saying getting 11 is bad for a 12 yo, has got some issues. (inferiority or superiority.. always hard to tell..)
even it it was bad, no need to rub it in someone's face.
I doubt I would have done that well on a similar quiz when I was 12. Mubarak and Gaddafi would have still been in power but I doubt I could have named them.
Arguably, Rome has been a country longer than Italy has. You had the Roman Kingdom (752-509 BC), Roman Republic (509-27 BC), Roman Empire (27 BC - 285 AD), Western Roman Empire (285-476), and the Papal States (754-1870). The Kingdom of Italy incorporated Rome in 1871 and in 1946 became the Italian Republic. Rome was a country for either 2,344 years or 1,228 years if you don't want to count the Papal States as Rome. Italy has been a country for 160 years.
You may want to give your definition of a dictator, you clearly mix many different ages and it is historically wrong to put aside Hitler or Mussolini with older leaders like Napoleon or Sulla or with more recent ones like Saddam Hussein.
This list does not make any sense, if you just take the fact that power was in the hands of a unique person you could put in there any king in history like Henry VIII or king Richard and I'm quite sure you wouldn't describe them as dictators though.
Why would the quiz need to define "dictator"? It's a common word. I teach political studies, though, so I'll go over what I know. Dictatorships are typically ruled by a single authoritarian leader, but in some cases they can be oligarchical. Most dictatorships today control the political process and media to the point that there is no challenge to their power. Dictators today also often have a cult of personality. The term dictator has historically been used simply to mean a single person who has achieved power in non-democratic or monarchical ways (i.e., no vote and no longstanding tradition to explain their power). There can be bad dictators, despots, and good leaders, commonly called benevolent dictators. Lee Kuan Yew is probably the best example of a benevolent dictator. Also, keep in mind that there are different forms of dictatorship. Totalitarianism is an extreme type of dictatorship that more or less tries to control the lives and beliefs of its citizens.
I think the quiz should define what is a dictator because it gives a list of people who are not commonly called dictators.
For instance, were Queen Victoria or Louis XVI dictators ? It quite matches your definition and thus could be put in this quiz but I'm not sure everybody would call them that way.
Moreover, you're giving a definition of a dictator "today", pointing out that mixing areas by using a single term for all these people is a nonsense.
Queen Victoria? Leaning towards no. The British Parliament was fairly developed in its ability to counteract the monarchy at that point. She didn't veto any laws or forcefully dissolve any governments but did have more say than modern constitutional monarchies do.
King Louis XVI? Objectively a dictator. Absolutist France was ruled by royal decree.
@Dimby And you seem to have missed the point Emric was making. The quiz deals for the most part with modern dictators, which are not quite the same as historical "dictators", as you yourself have pointed out. The latter group would include all absolute monarchies, making that group vastly larger than the first, so it's odd that only a couple are added.
In other words, the quiz is mainly about modern dictators, yet there's two emperors there who really stand out. Come on, let's not overcomplicate things, it seems pretty clear that Sulla and Napoleon are out of place in that group.
He was an emperor/king. There where a lot of kings and queens with absolute power over their country in history, french, british/english, dutch, swedish, spanish, chinese, russian, persian, egyptian, babylonian,... the list is endless.
A lot of them lead their countries into wars which brought destruction and despair over their citizen.
Napoleon did not succeed the throne because of longstanding tradition, and is therefore not a monarch. He took power by force in a coup d'etat, which is probably one of the most dictatorial ways to come to rule a country.
Tito was not a dictator, he was a president for life. In Socialist Yugoslavia the people ruled, so it doesn't even make sense that he is a dictator. Please fix this attrocity that is written in here to tie Tito, the man who saved his people and singlehandedly liberated and made one of the most powerful nations of the 20th century, together with monsters like Hitler or Mussolini.
Napoleon a dictator? We was a popular Emperor that made sweeping changes in France and contributed to the end of the French Monarchy. Metric system. Napoleonic Code. Education reforms. Central bank and revamped financial system. His influence enhanced the revolution that slowly got rid of the absolute power of the absurd monarchies.
Great quiz though!
So anyone saying getting 11 is bad for a 12 yo, has got some issues. (inferiority or superiority.. always hard to tell..)
even it it was bad, no need to rub it in someone's face.
Also is there any reason why Stalin was omitted from this quiz?
Rome was a country, arguably.
2. Yugoslavia - Serbia
3. Zaire - DRC
4. Rome - Italy
It doesn't make sense. Sulla wasn't an Italian in the modern sense.
This list does not make any sense, if you just take the fact that power was in the hands of a unique person you could put in there any king in history like Henry VIII or king Richard and I'm quite sure you wouldn't describe them as dictators though.
For instance, were Queen Victoria or Louis XVI dictators ? It quite matches your definition and thus could be put in this quiz but I'm not sure everybody would call them that way.
Moreover, you're giving a definition of a dictator "today", pointing out that mixing areas by using a single term for all these people is a nonsense.
King Louis XVI? Objectively a dictator. Absolutist France was ruled by royal decree.
In other words, the quiz is mainly about modern dictators, yet there's two emperors there who really stand out. Come on, let's not overcomplicate things, it seems pretty clear that Sulla and Napoleon are out of place in that group.
A lot of them lead their countries into wars which brought destruction and despair over their citizen.
Would you describe all of them as dictators?