Turkmenistan is a very... interesting country. I'd highly recommend looking up Niyazov and also his successor, Burdimuhamedow (I made a quiz on the latter if anyone's interested).
and DPRK or Democratic People's Republic of Korea should be accepted for North Korea. ROK or Republic of Korea should be accepted for South Korea. They are on all the quizzes I make myself... but changing them on every other countries quiz on the site would be a big hassle, I'm sure.
Technically... he still had the same position as before: leader of the Republic of China. It was just that the location of government shifted and the area that the country maintained sovereign control over shrank drastically.
I'm surprised so few knew Charles Taylor as he was recently in court for crimes against humanity and Naomi Campbell testified which made the international news.
You're right and you're wrong. Cromwell was Lord Protector of the "Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland." That would be, however, a little wordy for a Jetpunk quiz. And you will notice that other answers refer to the country or empire that the individual ruled, e.g., Julius Caesar ruled Rome.
Too many of these can be guessed just by looking at the name. I don't know half these guys but I can tell that they're Slavic, Arabic, East Asian, Southeast Asian, etc.
please add your source. the list is not complete nor exhaustive. plus it has some names that are popular in their country and it is not reasonable to include them
Dictator, though it usually has negative connotations, does not mean an evil or unpopular ruler- it merely means someone with absolute power, but these days when democracy is so highly valued, that is seen negatively. The Wikipedia entry expresses it much better.
Yes, he was elected, and yes, he allowed opposition. In fact, it's his opposition which ended up beheading him. There were no referendums at the time, but most world leaders can't be outvoted by referendum.
The Committee of Public Safety had multiple members. When Robespierre sat on it, there were 11 other members. He had no special powers over the others. He's just more famous.
22/22! I <3 Dictators! Relevant story about Park Chung Hee: I was in the ROK recently and visited the presidential retreat, which has a small museum that showcases former presidents' typical use of the grounds. While standing in front of Park Chung Hee's display, an elderly Korean woman with her approaching middle-aged son walk by and she says, MOM: "PARK CHUNG HEE?! Why is he here?" SON: "He was a president." MOM: "I know that, but he was horrible!" Ok, maybe not the most interesting story but related nevertheless.
He only took extreme measures to control all politics in France including having his former friends and associates and all political rivals executed? Presiding over "the terror" and eventually being executed himself for his role in this?
Robespierre never ordered to guillotine anyone. It wasn't the role of the Committee of Public Safety. It was the Committee of General Security that had the power to arrest people, and the Revolutionary Tribunal that executed them. The "Terror" is an a posteriori reconstruction meant for propaganda purposes.
The excesses that were committed in these days by some "Représentants en mission" (Members of the National Convention that would be sent by their collegues with full authority to reestablish order in the countryside) were usually condemned by Robespierre. For instance Fouché participated actively to the overthrow of Robespierre in Thermidor precisely because Robespierre wanted him tried for his atrocities in Lyon. The killing of Robespierre and his partisans was in fact the single biggest day of executions of the revolution : I wonder who was the underdog and who was the terrorist, right ?
A lot of the bad reputation Robespierre gets comes from the fact that, in English-speaking countries, the history of the French Revolution that has been is established was largely written by English aristocrats who were terrified of a Revolution - Edmund Burke, for instance. They vilified and greatly exaggerate what happened in France. The reality is a lot more complex. Who knows, for example, that Robespierre consistently spoke out against capital punishment (with one exception)?
Robespierre proposed all Frenchmen should be declared active citizens and eligible to vote, so Elio appears to be correct. There were some elections taking place in 1791.
Fun quiz, might be interesting to have the years in which they were in power as well, even if it only showed after the quiz for a bit of interesting info.
He never held either executive or legislative power. Considering him as a dictator is a farce.
He presided the Committee of Public Safety, which only took decision at the absolute majority, had to be reconducted every month by the National Convention, and was responsible in front of it. No decision could ever hope to pass if the National Convention opposed it. There a reason he was so easy to eliminate : the theoretical and institutional framework of that part of the French Revolution didn't enable him to ever become a dictator, and he never wanted to be one. On the contrary, he was usually in the minority in the National Convention : only his aura as a competent orator supported by the Parisian masses enabled him to have a semblance of authority over the National Convention, authority which always remained a moral one.
A lot of the English-speaking History of the French Revolution was written by foreign, often English, aristocrats, who were completely terrified of losing their privileges in their own country - especially Edmund Burke, who can by no stretch of the imagination be called an impartial onlooker.
Not the first one to say it but there is absolutely no reason to put Robespierre in this quiz, it's insane how people outside of France (and inside too tbh) are brainwashed with the Terror
The excesses that were committed in these days by some "Représentants en mission" (Members of the National Convention that would be sent by their collegues with full authority to reestablish order in the countryside) were usually condemned by Robespierre. For instance Fouché participated actively to the overthrow of Robespierre in Thermidor precisely because Robespierre wanted him tried for his atrocities in Lyon. The killing of Robespierre and his partisans was in fact the single biggest day of executions of the revolution : I wonder who was the underdog and who was the terrorist, right ?
You can name dozens of our kings instead, but Robespierre has never been seen here in France as a dictator, far from it.
Beware of the foreign's eyes misinterpretation...
He presided the Committee of Public Safety, which only took decision at the absolute majority, had to be reconducted every month by the National Convention, and was responsible in front of it. No decision could ever hope to pass if the National Convention opposed it. There a reason he was so easy to eliminate : the theoretical and institutional framework of that part of the French Revolution didn't enable him to ever become a dictator, and he never wanted to be one. On the contrary, he was usually in the minority in the National Convention : only his aura as a competent orator supported by the Parisian masses enabled him to have a semblance of authority over the National Convention, authority which always remained a moral one.
In some cases the term "dictatorship" seems not to fit, or at least not in the way we understand it nowadays.
As far as I know, Julius Caesar was the only one in this quiz who actually beared "dictator" as a title
- Antonio Salazar, Portugal
- Francisco Franco, Spain