I remembered Richard Wagner only because of the movie of a similar name in which Tom Cruise attempted to assassinate Hitler. (I then made the connection that Wagner was Hitler's favorite composer).
The only reason I know Wagner is because we played a piece of his in middle school, and my band director pronounced his name in a very exaggerated German accent like Ree-card Vahg-nahr. Very hard to forget something like that XD
Ironic that Maine is the closest state to Africa, considering it is either the whitest, or one of the top 3 whitest, states in the U.S. (by population.
Another perfect score wrecked by lord of the rings. Sigh. I need to tape a sheet to my laptop with common answers for lotr. Fell asleep during the first movie. Didn’t bother with the rest
For the longest time, I thought he was the founder of the Church of Satan (because he wrote the unrelated The Satanic Verses). But that was most definitely Anton LaVey.
Ok, I'll bite. How many other people do you know of just because they won the Booker Prize?
I mean, obviously I don't know you so maybe you're really into literature and peruse the NY Times Bestseller lists weekly, and follow any number of literary awards. Maybe.
But for the average person? I very much doubt that having won the Booker Prize is the sort of thing that would give an author nearly as much fame (and/or notoriety) as Rushdie has, among the populace at large.
Like: I'm reasonably well-read. And I'm on a trivia site like JetPunk, which gives me a bit of a head start already. But when I look over the list of Winners, I see that I've read (and enjoyed, to be sure!) maybe 10 of them.
But not a single one of those authors I would suggest (Yann Martel being the only possible exception) are in any way broadly famous (i.e.: among the populace at large) because of having won the Booker Prize.
I’ll definitely bite… Margaret Attwood, Ian McEwan, George Saunders, Alan Hollinghurst, William Golding, J.M. Coetzee, Iris Murdoch, Graham Swift, Kingsley Amis… from the top of my head.
It’s a very prestigious award, the fact that you’re unfamiliar with it doesn’t diminish that. Neither does it mean that everyone else is similarly unfamiliar. Also, he was already famous for winning the Booker for Midnights Children, without which it’s unlikely The Satanic Verses would have come to the attention of the Ayatollahs.
If you’re after doing a little self-improvement though, any of the above are worth a read, but my recommendation would be “The Inheritance of Loss” by Kiran Desai, a very good place to start.
Well then, I will bite your biting. I wouldn’t say that everyone is unfamiliar, but I imagine if you polled the general populace, the vast majority of people would have read at most one of these books (most likely Life of Pie, if any). Your own reading experience cannot be applied to everyone. Reading just is not a priority nowadays, and no matter how prestigious the award is, it does not mean everyone has read the books. I am fairly certain that I am more well read than the average person, and I have never heard of most of these books. Mrputter is correct in that the Booker award is not something that most people would know about.
@AlmostAGenius, let me present your own words back to you: "Your own reading experience cannot be applied to everyone." Apparently reading is not a priority for you, but I think you underestimate the popularity of reading among the general populace. Sure, not "everyone" has read the books on the list, but that's not what we're talking about. In my opinion, many people would recognize at least some of the book titles and authors on the list, and it seems fair to say that winning a prestigious award plays a role in that name recognition.
All that said, I agree that the fatwa likely raised Rushdie's profile quite a bit.
I was very amused by the "What was [Istanbul] called before [Constantinople]" question! In Greece we are taught this detail quite thoroughly at school, so it's interesting to see 72% of the people who took this quiz knew about Constantinople but only 29% about Byzantium. Gives me some comfort after realizing I don't know a lot of facts about the USA, lol.
After Constantine moved the capital of the Roman Empire to Byzantium, he renamed it New Rome, a name that the city held for quite a while. Then it was renamed in his honor (Constantinople). Finally, the Ottomans conquered Constantinople and called it Istanbul. So this is the path:
Byzantium ---> New Rome ---> Constantinople ---> Istanbul.
In summary, New Rome was Constantinople's name before it was changed.
The official name of the city in the Ottoman period remained Constantinople (Konstantiniyye). The Turkish Republic changed it to Istanbul in 1930, though this name had been used colloquially for centuries.
How is Beatrice not an answer for the "Bea" question? I have a family member named Beatrice and she has always gone by Bea. Maybe she's an outlier as I don't think I know anyone else with that name, but it seems natural.
Agreed. Please accept Guinevere for Camelot. I'll bet dollars to doughnuts she spent more time there than her hubby who was off galavanting all the time :)
I agree with accepting postscript, but the shown answer should be the correct one.
Just like R.I.P. stands for "requiescat in pacem" and not "rest in peace" - although they're the same sentence, or E.G. stands for "exempli gratia" and not "example given".
Etymologically, that might be what they originally meant, but that's not what people mean when they use those abbreviations now. Regardless, words and abbreviations can have more than one meaning.
You don't need to know how to calculate the surface of a cube. I mean, you dont need any specific formulas. You just need to know how to count the area of a square and that there's 6 faces.
Being Finnish myself I dare slightly dispute the statement of sauna being invented in Finland. Similar inventions have been created in many places (for example native Americans did it). Actually it looks to me that people living in touch climates (deserts, cold winters etc., or just places where water has been a scarce resource) have often used something like sauna.
Yes, similar invetions have existed, I mean, it's essentially trapping heat from a fire to an enclosed space. However, sauna as we know and understand it today did originate from Finland. Also the word comes from Finnish. You mentioned the Native American "saunas" which were not saunas at all, they were used for rituals and the warming effect as pleasure was merely a by-product.
No need to use the past tense in relation to traditional Indigenous practices around sweatlodges (and other heat/steam related practices in what are now called the Americas). These practices are alive and well :)
As a side note, while sweatlodges encompass sacred/ceremonial purposes and have traditional protocols, they can also have health/family/social components, depending on the community and the situation.
On another note, here's a PSA: beware non-Indigenous for-sale fake-shaman "sweatlodge" events -- these can be dangerous because they are not built/conducted in traditional ways and there have been injuries and even fatalities at them.
I still think you shouldn't accept "Marie" for "Marie-Antoinette". the Antoinette is not a middle name, it's the second part of her first name, which is why they're hyphenated. If you refer to her as "Queen Marie", even in context, nobody will know who you're talking about.
Noooio, there's no way it's spelled Constantinople. I knew the answer but kept trying ConstantinopOle and almost cried when I saw the correct answer,. Bc in Czech it's called Konstantinopol, so that got me kinda confused, dammit.
It's from the title of an American short story from 1924 about... well, that sort of hunt. It's been adapted for movie, TV, and radio numerous times, either directly or as an homage, often making specific reference to the title.
Really loved this one — it taught me a lot that I'm embarrassed I didn't know. Bit disappointed that it didn't accept "me" for the most dangerous game.
"What was supposedly invented by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008, and originally traded for less than 1 cent?"
What's the word "supposedly" doing here? It's an indisputable fact that Satoshi Nakamoto developed/invented/whatever BitCoin. The only thing that's unclear is who, and how many, Nakamoto actually is...
PosedionPoseidionPosedonarrggghhhhI mean, obviously I don't know you so maybe you're really into literature and peruse the NY Times Bestseller lists weekly, and follow any number of literary awards. Maybe.
But for the average person? I very much doubt that having won the Booker Prize is the sort of thing that would give an author nearly as much fame (and/or notoriety) as Rushdie has, among the populace at large.
Like: I'm reasonably well-read. And I'm on a trivia site like JetPunk, which gives me a bit of a head start already. But when I look over the list of Winners, I see that I've read (and enjoyed, to be sure!) maybe 10 of them.
But not a single one of those authors I would suggest (Yann Martel being the only possible exception) are in any way broadly famous (i.e.: among the populace at large) because of having won the Booker Prize.
It’s a very prestigious award, the fact that you’re unfamiliar with it doesn’t diminish that. Neither does it mean that everyone else is similarly unfamiliar. Also, he was already famous for winning the Booker for Midnights Children, without which it’s unlikely The Satanic Verses would have come to the attention of the Ayatollahs.
If you’re after doing a little self-improvement though, any of the above are worth a read, but my recommendation would be “The Inheritance of Loss” by Kiran Desai, a very good place to start.
All that said, I agree that the fatwa likely raised Rushdie's profile quite a bit.
Byzantium ---> New Rome ---> Constantinople ---> Istanbul.
In summary, New Rome was Constantinople's name before it was changed.
I agree with accepting postscript, but the shown answer should be the correct one.
Just like R.I.P. stands for "requiescat in pacem" and not "rest in peace" - although they're the same sentence, or E.G. stands for "exempli gratia" and not "example given".
As a side note, while sweatlodges encompass sacred/ceremonial purposes and have traditional protocols, they can also have health/family/social components, depending on the community and the situation.
On another note, here's a PSA: beware non-Indigenous for-sale fake-shaman "sweatlodge" events -- these can be dangerous because they are not built/conducted in traditional ways and there have been injuries and even fatalities at them.
What's the word "supposedly" doing here? It's an indisputable fact that Satoshi Nakamoto developed/invented/whatever BitCoin. The only thing that's unclear is who, and how many, Nakamoto actually is...