The status of this political geography has changed since I studied it, so put an asterisk on all of it.
I don't think China claims any part of Kashmir. I think its claims are limited to Ladakh, which historically had been part of Jammu and Kashmir, but is now a separate territory. Claims over Jammu are even less likely. The state is Jammu and Kashmir - the "and" is important, especially if one is harkening back to the reasons/justifications for Kashmir's inclusion in India.
I was going to say that I thought bonobos were actually more closely related to humans than chimps. I didn't realize they were a subset of chimp. Are they? Chimps are so violent, Bonobos are peaceful and just have sex all day.
Bonobos are one of two species of the genus Pan, the other being the common chimp. Although the entire genus is sometimes referred to as “chimpanzees”, that’s not really right. Bonobos are a totally separate species from chimpanzees, so Quizkey is correct and bonobos should be accepted. (Bonobos Join Chimps as Closest Human Relatives).
I’m curious though about why, Quizmaster, you said the fighters/lovers dichotomy is a misconception. I’ve recently watched a documentary on bonobos and read a book a few years ago, and I don’t remember anything that made it seem like the conventional wisdom wasn’t true. Can you point me to some sources I could look up? I’m fascinated by bonobos!
Here's a book that gets into the subject. Of course, a few decades ago, chimpanzees were seen as peaceful creatures too. Then Jane Goodall documented chimpanzees engaging in all sorts of violence. So it was necessary to then transfer the hopeful aspirations of mankind onto bonobos. My personal opinion is that chimps, bonobos, and humans are all naturally violent. Fortunately, as humans, we live in a society which constrains our baser instincts.
So you're transferring your cynical view of humanity on to them instead? Also curious why they're not accepted as an answer. Some things I've read suggest they are even more closely related to humans than chimps.
Switzerland occasionally uses Latin when it can't fit all 4 languages, like on coinage, stamps (Helvetia) or for abbreviations. Confoederatio Helvetica = CH.
Bonobos are equally as related to humans as chimpanzees are. Should also accept 'pygmy chimpanzee' as that it another common name for bonobos, despite them being a different species.
I assume relatedness is measured by when the species diverged? So humans diverged from chimps/bonobos first, then chimps and bonobos diverged?
It seems to me that the other obvious way to measure relatedness would be by how similar the genetic code is which presumably could be more varied from species to species even if they did diverge after the human - chimp/bonobo split?
Yeah, that's exactly it. The ancestors to the modern-day genus Pan (chimpanzees and bonobos) split from the ancestors of genus Homo (ourselves) somewhere between 5 and 13 million years ago (lots of estimates based on different methodologies). Chimpanzees and bonobos then diverged from one another ~0.9 million years ago, after being isolated long enough by the River Congo (bonobos to the south, chimpanzees to the north). If you imagine that as a tree, chimpanzees and bonobos are two small branches of the same larger branch, which itself had already diverged from the human branch a lot earlier. So they're equally as related to us.
For the .ch question, after China and Chile of course, my third guess was Switzerland even though I had no idea why it would be correct or how I would know it. I suppose it just seemed like a very Swiss thing to do
According to wikipedia Prometheus didn't create men at all, he just stole fire from the Gods and gave it to them.
He also wasn't a Titan but the son of the Titan Iapetus and the Oceanide Asia/Clymene. He himself is just described as 'an important figure in Greek mythology'. Maybe change the question?
Honestly can't believe that Franklin D. Roosevelt isn't the least guessed answer in this quiz. Am I missing something? I'm from the UK so that probably doesn't help but how does anyone know the birth and death place and date for a random president?
That's a little disingenuous--it's like calling Churchill a "random" PM. FDR's death before the conclusion of the war is a pretty famous and important historical fact, too, it's not just some random date.
That said, it's pretty low, so I don't think you're missing anything, it's just a little harder than some of these others.
I don't think China claims any part of Kashmir. I think its claims are limited to Ladakh, which historically had been part of Jammu and Kashmir, but is now a separate territory. Claims over Jammu are even less likely. The state is Jammu and Kashmir - the "and" is important, especially if one is harkening back to the reasons/justifications for Kashmir's inclusion in India.
Popular misconception!
I’m curious though about why, Quizmaster, you said the fighters/lovers dichotomy is a misconception. I’ve recently watched a documentary on bonobos and read a book a few years ago, and I don’t remember anything that made it seem like the conventional wisdom wasn’t true. Can you point me to some sources I could look up? I’m fascinated by bonobos!
It seems to me that the other obvious way to measure relatedness would be by how similar the genetic code is which presumably could be more varied from species to species even if they did diverge after the human - chimp/bonobo split?
He also wasn't a Titan but the son of the Titan Iapetus and the Oceanide Asia/Clymene. He himself is just described as 'an important figure in Greek mythology'. Maybe change the question?
Bob.
That said, it's pretty low, so I don't think you're missing anything, it's just a little harder than some of these others.