It's not a national capital though, Greenland is part of Denmark. (And yes, I'm aware that the quiz says "European capitals" and not "European national capitals"...)
I think ihaveaname is referring to the fact that the peak today called Uhuru peak was originally named Kaiser Wilhelm peak by the first European who climbed it. However, as Abzilla has pointed out, it is the name of a peak and not of the entire mountain. Kilimanjaro is the original Kiswahili name of the mountain, and no other name has ever been used by the colonizers.
Technically, Napoleon stole German areas, the Germans took them back in 1871. Nobody there spoke French. Look at the architecture, the city names: Metz, Strasburg, Kolmar, Mulhouse. The French may have changed the spellings of place names but they still don't sound French.
1. It wasn't Napoleon's doing how Alsace and Lorraine became French. Lorraine (Formerly the Duchy of Lorraine) came under the rule of the father of the French Queen (former King of Poland) as a part of a Franco-Austrian deal for France allowing the former Lorrainian duke marrying the Austrian Empress. According to the deal, Lorraine was to be annexed once the duke died of age. Alsace became French piece by piece with acquisitions taking place in 1646 (purchase of Sundgau), 1697 (peace of Ryswick), and 1798 (annexation of Mulhouse). Nothing to do with Napoleon, stop with the misinformation.
2. What you said - the region being absolute majority German would apply for Alsace but not really for Lorraine.
You'll recognize a clear presence of German speakers in German Lorraine, but also that it's quite far from being "nobody there spoke French".
To add to Nerd0921's reponse, the people speaking a Germanic language doesn't mean they were part of a Germany which didn't exist back then nor that they wanted to be part of it after its creation. Mostly-catholic Alsatians weren't fond of being ruled by protestant Prussians with who they shared very little culture.
You can't really find polls of the Alsatians' views in the 19th century, but for what it's worth, my great-grandparents and people I knew from that time (who spoke Alsatian as a first language) clearly preferred France to Germany, at least as the lesser of two evils.
Which is why I would like to suggest "Moselle" to be accepted as an alternate answer for Lorraine. Alsace-Moselle is an alternate name known for Alsace-Lorraine and is something which I believe will be much more familiar for quite a few Europeans (albeit from the Francophone parts).
Plus, it was the legal name of the region post-1920. Though undeniably due to some nationalistic causes, it would be odd to not accept the legally referred-to name of the region
Well I thought of Saar/Sarre/Saarland and having typed in a whole load of alternative spellings, it turned out to be wrong anyway, although I am not sure why.
Technically, India and Nepal aren't the only Hindu majority countries. Mauritius is also a Hindu-majority country with Hindu population over 50%, mainly due to the importation of Indian laborers during the British Rule.
Also, I live in India and know that many regional languages of India such as Bengali, Tamil, Punjabi, etc are also recognized as official languages. Although English and Hindi are mainly used for government use, I suggest that it would be better to specify.
I agree that Turkey should be considered to be in Europe, but given that its in Asia, Cyprus might as well join it.
But honestly, it's silly to go from the Urals down (somewhere?) to the Caspian then jog all the way across the Caucuses and around all of Turkey just because suddenly now we "need" the Bosporus to be able to figure out where the border is, like we needed it to figure out how much of Kazakhstan is in Europe.....
Capitals are not geographical features. The North Atlantic Shelf goes through Iceland and Reykjavik is on the North America side so following geographic reasoning it doesn't qualify either. Politically the two islands are generally regarded as European.
I think questions like "Most populous cities in Spain starting with B" and "Tallest mountains in Africa" are bad questions for this type of quiz, because these are not natural groups of two. You could have the same questions in a groups of three quiz, a groups of four quiz, and so on.
The problem with accepting the names of places in "their" language (e.g. München for Munich) is that it almost assuredly means treating different places differently. For example, it makes sense to accept München for Munich but it gets dicier if in order to accept Chelyabinsk for a quiz the quiz creator either has to know Челябинск or risk being unfair and favoring German places over Russian ones. See?
Personally, I think it's mostly harmless either way, but it's not completely neutral to sometimes accept native-language names for a place and not other times.
I don't think you can just casually extend that line to count non-Latin scripts. And it also has to do with how actively you would expect speakers of that language to be taking the quiz in English, especially on a site that offers other language options.
In the case of German names in particular, it makes a lot of sense because the consistency of using the German names versus the French names when speaking English varies substantially by where that English is being spoken, and many German speakers also speak English, so both factors push in that direction.
I know that the topic was mentioned in previous comments, but if the question reads "European capitals" Nicosia definitely qualifies. Cyprus is part of the European Union, is also part of all Europe-related quizzes here, and is further from Reykjavik than Athens.
If you refer to "Capitals on the European continent" there might be an argument, but then it gets even more complicated.
I was laughing a lot to the comparison with Greenland, but this I leave to the one who wrote the comment.
Lots of people are arguing about Nicosia being further on the Europe question (although it being in Asia) But no one is arguing how Portland is approx. 8000km from Honolulu whilst Augusta is just 7500. Am I missing something?
Thanks - a fun quiz. I have two quibbles: Firstly the two African capitals are not "above" 35 North, they are North of it. Above would place them in the air. Secondly, on the same argument that places Cyprus in Asia, not Europe, surely Trinidad is in South America? And therefore, Port of Spain is not in North America.
I'm not sure what you think the argument for Cyprus "not being in Europe" is, but no. If Turkey were in Europe and Syria was Asian, that comparison might hold some weight. As is, it's closer to arguing about which continent Rhodes is supposed to be in.
It's admittedly hard to do for twosomes, but I hate how many times this quiz uses superlatives (or pseudo-superlatives, like the first question). Questions like "Spanish archipelagos", "Official languages of India", and "Countries whose currency is called the Ruble" are great. Questions like "Cities with the most gambling revenue" are not. You can fudge it a bit by using the pseudo-superlatives and by picking superlatives where there is a massive gap between 2 and 3, but when half of the quiz is fudging it (or worse), it doesn't feel very much like a "groups of two" quiz, but just a "you need to type two answers" one.
Just my 2 cents, but I'd love to see 4 or 5 of these questions replaced with ones that actually refer to a pair of things that are the only things in that category, not the "most" of that category. 25% of the quiz feels like it's enough times to use the superlative "trick".
Lorraine is a wrong answer as only Moselle departement (1 out of the 4 departements making Lorraine region) was taken by Germany in 1871.
So France did not gain BACK (also important) Lorraine region but only Moselle departement in addition to Alsace region.
To be precised it was almost all of Moselle and half of Meurthe at the time that were taken by Germany. With the remaining territories in France becoming the actual Meurthe et Moselle departement and the annexed German part becoming the actual Moselle departement.
Also after WWI, France did gain Saarland region from Germany which should be a correct answer according to the way your question is written.
I would suggest to change "Regions" by "French territories" and use "Alsace" and "Moselle" as correct answers.
Though 20 of them (thus excluding Hindi and English) are regional ones.
About Lorraine, just one third in the North known as Moselle was annexed by Germany. Most of Lorraine remained French
2. What you said - the region being absolute majority German would apply for Alsace but not really for Lorraine.
You'll recognize a clear presence of German speakers in German Lorraine, but also that it's quite far from being "nobody there spoke French".
https://external-preview.redd.it/nM7eIiy5u_TdWgdBZ844ifbJ6bRx63ZdvR_rB9dvZUs.jpg?auto=webp&s=15695dbe35078cd1fdca8050c60118ab700217e2
You can't really find polls of the Alsatians' views in the 19th century, but for what it's worth, my great-grandparents and people I knew from that time (who spoke Alsatian as a first language) clearly preferred France to Germany, at least as the lesser of two evils.
Et malgré vous nous resterons Français ;
Vous avez pu germaniser la plaine,
Mais notre cœur, vous ne l'aurez jamais."
("You won't have Alsace and Lorraine,
And despite your will, we will stay French
You could have germanized the plain
But our hearts, you will never have them")
Plus, it was the legal name of the region post-1920. Though undeniably due to some nationalistic causes, it would be odd to not accept the legally referred-to name of the region
Also, I live in India and know that many regional languages of India such as Bengali, Tamil, Punjabi, etc are also recognized as official languages. Although English and Hindi are mainly used for government use, I suggest that it would be better to specify.
Also Turkey is European country and Ankara is more farther then Athens.
But honestly, it's silly to go from the Urals down (somewhere?) to the Caspian then jog all the way across the Caucuses and around all of Turkey just because suddenly now we "need" the Bosporus to be able to figure out where the border is, like we needed it to figure out how much of Kazakhstan is in Europe.....
Personally, I think it's mostly harmless either way, but it's not completely neutral to sometimes accept native-language names for a place and not other times.
In the case of German names in particular, it makes a lot of sense because the consistency of using the German names versus the French names when speaking English varies substantially by where that English is being spoken, and many German speakers also speak English, so both factors push in that direction.
If you refer to "Capitals on the European continent" there might be an argument, but then it gets even more complicated.
I was laughing a lot to the comparison with Greenland, but this I leave to the one who wrote the comment.
Just my 2 cents, but I'd love to see 4 or 5 of these questions replaced with ones that actually refer to a pair of things that are the only things in that category, not the "most" of that category. 25% of the quiz feels like it's enough times to use the superlative "trick".
So France did not gain BACK (also important) Lorraine region but only Moselle departement in addition to Alsace region.
To be precised it was almost all of Moselle and half of Meurthe at the time that were taken by Germany. With the remaining territories in France becoming the actual Meurthe et Moselle departement and the annexed German part becoming the actual Moselle departement.
Also after WWI, France did gain Saarland region from Germany which should be a correct answer according to the way your question is written.
I would suggest to change "Regions" by "French territories" and use "Alsace" and "Moselle" as correct answers.