Only one I missed was Netherlands/Zeeland. I always thought it was named for the island of Zealand in Denmark. couldn't undertsand why it wouldn't take it. lol
PS 'The terms Oceania or Australasia are sometimes substituted for Australia to denote a region encompassing the Australian continent" -Wikipedia.
Holland might historically be the term for what is now the provinces of North and South Holland, but I'd say it's pretty much accepted to use it as a synonym for the Netherlands. It is, anyway, in the Netherlands itself - hence a football song like 'Hup Holland Hup' and words like 'oerhollands', meaning something that is very Dutch. There are TV shows called 'Holland's got talent' and 'The Voice of Holland'. This use of 'Holland' for the Netherlands is not wrongful in my opinion, since the pars pro toto is a completely accepted figure of speech.
Thanks for saying this tourwoorden. A lot of foreigners think that we as Dutch people are offended when people say Holland when they mean the entire country. But in fact, we dont really care and as you say, we use it ourselves as well in songs for example. I know its a bit late, but I just wanted to say this.
Hmmm....I lived in the Netherlands for a few years and met more than a few people from places like Groningen who found the habit of referring to the whole country as 'Holland' quite irritating!
Holland is only the name for 2 provinces (Noord (North) Holland and Zuid (South) Holland, which include Amsterdam and Rotterdam). Zeeland is another province. The name of the country is 'the Netherlands'.
holland.com still goes to the Dutch government website for the Netherlands. I know it's not strictly accurate, but it's so ubiquitous that I can't see how it can be abandoned yet. In Peru in Spanish the country is usually called 'Holanda', for example.
It's certainly not like referring to the UK as just England.
Why is Holland not a country?? I have a Dutch friend, and she always says she comes from Holland, I've never heard her say "I'm from the Netherlands". I thought it was just a different way of saying it. I'm English, but I could also say I'm British or I'm from the Uk. I know these terms pertain to slightly different ares, but they're all acceptable ways of ways of saying basically the same thing. Only people who are massive sticklers for political correctness seem to get their knickers in a twist!
I'd say it's slightly condescending of the Dutch to say they are from "Holland" (unless they are from one of the two provinces; north or south holland). The Dutch tend to believe that if you say "The Netherlands" no American will have any idea what they are talking about.
@someone2018 that's the dumbest thing I've heard. Australia is the actual name of the country, Holland isn't. Calling the Netherlands Holland is almost like calling the US Carolina or Dakota.
Not every distinction of meaning involves political correctness. This is just a misunderstanding over how two terms relate to the same country. If you're going to get yourself into a lather over terms being used correctly or incorrectly, you should probably check to be sure you're using your own terms correctly.
You'd be totally ok when someone refers to you as coming from England. Now imagine you were Scottish, living in Scotland and someone says you're from England... Same thing, many people in the Netherlands don't care, because it is well knowm "Holland" is more common to use in many places and most actually do live in either North or South Holland. Doesn't make it right, though
holland isnt a country but everybody has been using it so long that they think it is. So if you say you are from teh netherlands most people dont have a clue what you are talking about.( though it seems to get slightly better) So instead of sticking up for ourselves, we give in and use the term other were wrongly using.. dont want to stick our necks out..
(Im not sure I would call it condesscending but definately annoying, I guess it would be calling someone that is from scotland an englishman, it is just wrong so it doesnt feel nice)
About 30 years ago, I was told by a Dutch person (she is in her 60s now) that people from the Netherlands often told Americans they are from “Holland” because too many had looked at them blankly when they said “The Netherlands” – but apparently could comprehend and mentally identify “Holland”. So yeah, it was basically dumbing things down for us Yanks.
I had issues with term Netherlands when I moved to UK from Poland since in Polish it's "Holandia". All countries in English and Polish are guessable if heard or read but Netherlands is just that annoying monstrosity lol.
If she's from Holland, she can say "I'm from Holland". But if someone asks "In which country were you born", she can't say Holland, as it's not a country.
A very good quiz! But Kaliningrad, strictly speaking, isn't the part of Russia in question, but only the biggest town there. The area should be identified as Kaliningrad Oblast, potentially as East Prussia (admittedly, this historical region is bigger than the current oblast).
I'm sorry, but accepting "Holland" for The Netherlands is like accepting "England" for the UK.
Just because ignorant foreigners (and many English people too) don't know the difference and persist in calling it as such, doesn't make it correct, and accepting such terms only encourages their ignorance.
This may help fix the problems with Greenland/Australia and Holland/Netherlands. Based on the National Geographic Bee in 2016/2017, Holland is not acceptable for the Netherlands. Also, Australia is considered the continent and Oceania is the region (with Oceania not being acceptable for the continent of Australia; the questions always follow the same pattern in the fact that they are always looking for the continent rather than the region).
It's quite simple really. Australia (the landmass, not the country) is the largest landmass in the continent of Oceania, and therefore qualifies as the continental landmass. All the other landmasses in the continent, being smaller, qualify as islands. Some of these islands happen to belong to the country of Australia. Greenland is not the largest landmass in the North American continent so qualifies as an island.
Because England, being a delineated area of land, is a valid bit of geography. The Saint is in the category as well, as he seems to follow the laws of border control.
I find the St George thing problematic. It's the right answer but, given that there's no good evidence that he ever existed, it's high time that we Brits chose a new patron saint. I propose St Alban, the first British martyr, who definitely existed and, after whom the Roman capital of Britain was renamed. Does jetpunk have the power to change this?
"We Brits"? What would the patron saint of England have to do with Welsh, Scottish or Irish people? I hope you're not conflating England with the rest of the UK.
It is a common misconception that the Oktoberfest is something which exists outside of Munich. There is only one Oktoberfest, all others are just knock-offs. The Oktoberfest is not a festivity which has specific relevance to the German-speaking world. It is historically anchored only in Munich. The reason why it has recently become a more widespread phenomenon can be attributed to its use in getting large numbers of drunkards to drink overpriced beer in unreasonable amounts, thus being an important economic factor for cities.
Quizmaster probably worded the question the way he did because otherwise someone would complain that he went to an "Oktoberfest" in Wakefield, Kansas. As you say there are knockoffs but if they carry the name Oktoberfest, well, they are an Oktoberfest. By the way we have one in my little city in western Germany, too, and the Lederhosen and Dirndls are just as exotic for us as they are for Americans.
PS 'The terms Oceania or Australasia are sometimes substituted for Australia to denote a region encompassing the Australian continent" -Wikipedia.
It's certainly not like referring to the UK as just England.
(Im not sure I would call it condesscending but definately annoying, I guess it would be calling someone that is from scotland an englishman, it is just wrong so it doesnt feel nice)
Just because ignorant foreigners (and many English people too) don't know the difference and persist in calling it as such, doesn't make it correct, and accepting such terms only encourages their ignorance.