...and this quiz is about French Empire Geography. Two things wrong with this. 1. I can barely say that that question is geography. 2. This quiz is about the French Empire not France itself.
Although Egypt was not under French colonial rule when the canal was dug, it was most certainly dug as part of the wider French colonial project. Its construction threatened British control over the existing route to India via the cape. It certainly belongs here.
Plus the canal company was jointly owned by France and Britain from the 1870s to the 1950s when Nasser nationalised it, leading eventually to the last gasp of European colonialism with the Suez crisis.
There are many people of French descent in Louisiana. The term 'Cajun' refers only to some of them, primarily the descendants of those people expelled from Nova Scotia in the 18th century. New Orleanians of French descent would not call themselves Cajuns.
Times have changed. Unlike previous centuries, empires' treatment of people in their colonies are no longer terrible, and being a French citizen means a much better life than a citizen of another Suriname or Guyana.
Colonialism is kind of like that famous Borscht belt joke. "The food tastes terrible ... and such small portions". Colonialism was bad, and it ended too soon. Many countries that became independent after WWII would have been better off had they stayed colonies.
People of French overseas regions are generally inclined to stay French nowadays, because they tend to enjoy far better standards of living than their neighbors, even if, to be fair, it's generally lower than what is called Metropolitan France.
The contrast is particularly striking in French Guiana, as it borders Suriname, one of the poorer countries in South America, and Northern Brazil, the least developed part of the country.
This is not to say that the situation could not be improved, as shown by the massive strikes that took place in the region earlier this year, but the issues they're suffering are either way smaller than in other countries in the area, or could not be resolved in any way by independence, which would cut them a critical lot of subventions to Overseas Territories from Metropolitan France.
Going on strike at the drop of a hat is simply part of French culture, isn't it?
When I started my "year in France" for my degree, my responsable told me that there had been a teachers' strike every year that they had been having an English assistant, which as far as I remember was the previous 18 years. Sure enough they did have a strike a few months in. It had something to do with a mammoth, or something else equally impenetrable.
The people of French Guiana choose to remain a part of France because they, wisely, saw what happened on the neighboring former Guianas - (Surinam and Guyana) once they became independent.
Does it depend on how we define North America? I certainly wouldn't call Haiti (Saint-Domingue) North American, but quizzes on this site often do. In that case, I doubt that the value of North American furs matched the sugar coming out of the Caribbean. (But I really don't know.)
The JetPunk definition of North America is everything from Panama north and every independent country in the Caribbean. South America is just the landmass itself, from Colombia to Argentina.
Much of what is today Canada was owned by the French at one time, and Montreal was one of the most important cities in the fur trade. The entirety of the Northern part of North America was VERY rich in fur-bearing animals. The history of Canada and the fur trade is quite interesting. Give it a look :)
I'm pretty sure Vanuatu was never formally part of the French Empire, but was jointly administered by Britain and France, originally as a condominium and later as the New Hebrides
That is incorrect, it was a condominium but was never a colony of either France or the United Kingdom. One of the main reasons the country is one of the poorest in the Pacific today is that both European countries heavily exploited the islands but barely invested in creating infrastructure on the islands like roads, airports and port facilities. Most of the infrastructure which exists there today was created during WW2 when the Americans used Vanuatu as a staging area for their struggles with the Japanese in the Solomon Islands at Guadalcanal.
I had no idea what or where Saint Pierre and Miquelon was, but I figured I had enough time to brute force my way through as many countries of the world as I could to guess what's near it. Little did I know the very first country I guessed was the right answer!
Dangit. Went with Sint Maarten (or some attempt to spell it) and decided I wouldn’t get that one when it didn’t work. Saint Martin would’ve been a much easier guess to spell!
Given it's the least correctly answered question, maybe the wording about the primary export of France's North American colonies can be tweaked?
Presumably, Quizmaster used the term "colonies" to denote a past state. But without a given date (e.g. in the 18th century), I was left barking up various wrong trees, believing the question pertained to current French possessions in North America. Thus, I guessed "sugar", "rum", and fish etc. Had I understood the question was about New France, I would have got "fur" immediately.
The contrast is particularly striking in French Guiana, as it borders Suriname, one of the poorer countries in South America, and Northern Brazil, the least developed part of the country.
This is not to say that the situation could not be improved, as shown by the massive strikes that took place in the region earlier this year, but the issues they're suffering are either way smaller than in other countries in the area, or could not be resolved in any way by independence, which would cut them a critical lot of subventions to Overseas Territories from Metropolitan France.
When I started my "year in France" for my degree, my responsable told me that there had been a teachers' strike every year that they had been having an English assistant, which as far as I remember was the previous 18 years. Sure enough they did have a strike a few months in. It had something to do with a mammoth, or something else equally impenetrable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_America
Presumably, Quizmaster used the term "colonies" to denote a past state. But without a given date (e.g. in the 18th century), I was left barking up various wrong trees, believing the question pertained to current French possessions in North America. Thus, I guessed "sugar", "rum", and fish etc. Had I understood the question was about New France, I would have got "fur" immediately.
Anybody agree?