Doubly landlocked means it is landlocked by countries that are also landlocked. It says Uzbekistan counts, but Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan both touch the Caspian. Lichtenstein, on the other hand, is surrounded by Switzerland and Austria, which touch no major bodies of water.
Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan aren't doubly landlocked because they both border countries (Russia, Iran) that are not landlocked. Frankly, I find the concept of "doubly landlocked" to be an exercise in triviality - it makes no difference, practically speaking, whether your country is singly or doubly landlocked. It's not like you get a free pass to use neighboring countries' ports 5 times a year - this isn't a board game.
Being double-landlocked is of some importance re: trading via water shipping routes. Goods coming by way of ship need to go through two countries to get to the destination.
Doubly Landlocked is important. In order for a person or company to ship something large, for instance, overseas, they would have to pay import and export fees in two countries before arriving at a third destination.It's a good reason why warm water (or non-freezing) ports are highly valued.
The concept of "double landlocked" is much less trivial information than a lot of other information on jetpunk. It challenges and exercises your geography knowledge and has implications for double taxes/tariffs.
Now, those quizzes on jetpunk about which sports team wins the league cup each year from 1900 to 2017... That is truly useless and trivial information that has zero intrinsic value.
Getting upset about double landlockedness seems misplaced in comparison.
How many top-selling hits have you had? Give the man some respect (which is what George Michael did!). Watch the recent documentary on Wham, and you'll see that he was no a nobody.
I can't believe the Aussies chose the lame as you-know-what emu as one of its national symbols! How can you be home to such an awesome animal as the platypus and not choose it?!
Ever been eye to eye with an emu. We lost a war to them. They are kick ass characters. And the males incubate and care for the chicks. I can get behind that.
False: Softwoods and hardwoods are only applied to trees that are used for their timber. A tree is usually considered one of the two, but it is not a definitive classification, but a relative scale.
Those are types of plants, not types of trees. All plants are either angiosperms or gymnosperms. Deciduous and evergreen apply only to trees and not bushes or shrubs or grasses or ferns.
you can argue bushes and other herbaceous plants can be evergreen and deciduous as well, like the broadleaved evergreen genus: Euonymus, the common holly genus: Ilex, amongst others. None of which are trees and all of which receive the classification of evergreen.
This is incorrect. Angiosperms and Gymnosperms only make up a small part of all plants, though they do include, among others, all trees. However, there are lots of basal plants outside these two taxa, for example all mosses and ferns.
There are three recent species of elephants: African bush elephant, African forest elephant, and Asian elephant. You could however change the word “species” in the question to “genera” and have a correct question without changing the answers. The African elephants form the genus Loxodonta, while the Asian elephant is the only extant member of the genus Elephas.
Stout is a type of ale. Most beer styles fall under ale (IPA, pale ale, bitter, brown ale, hefeweizen, most porters...) or lager (pilsner, helles, dunkel, schwarzbier...) depending on the yeast used.
Each pair needs to be taken together, too. If someone said "name a type of beer", I'd probably take it to mean "style" and "stout" seems reasonable (or other more general or more specific styles). But if there's only two, it's obvious that stout isn't one of them, because one of stout's peer entities clearly can't comprise all (or almost all) beer.
And even if you could find a few edge cases (wild or unusual yeasts?) that are arguable, "ale" and "lager" are clearly the best answer if not unarguably correct for every case.
What defines the "most influential ancient Chinese philosopher"? Confucious is probably a given, certainly the most well known, but the others would be open for debate. Sun Tzu for instance.
If only Americans ever called it soccer, that would still be over 4% of the planet... and I'm pretty sure they call it fútbol in Spain, as they rarely feel the need to translate themselves into English.
The High Holidays are the 10 days starting on Rosh haShana and ending on Yom Kippur. They're "high" because they're a time of repentance and awe, for spiritual "elevation" rather than wild partying.
Please change your clue about the Chinese philosophers to make it read more like your clues for Islam, the Communist Manifesto, Judaism, etc. "Most influential" is subjective, whereas those other clues aren't.
I mean... is it though? Like there is a limit to the subjectivity of that. For instance, I might claim to be a Chinese philosopher, but no one would realistically claim I was the most influential one... so who else is there?
I find it strange that the backing singers of Wham! are barely even mentioned on their Wikipedia page (Dee C. Lee, Shirlie Holliman, and later Helen DeMacque)
Now, those quizzes on jetpunk about which sports team wins the league cup each year from 1900 to 2017... That is truly useless and trivial information that has zero intrinsic value.
Getting upset about double landlockedness seems misplaced in comparison.
And even if you could find a few edge cases (wild or unusual yeasts?) that are arguable, "ale" and "lager" are clearly the best answer if not unarguably correct for every case.
But does anyone else find the spelling issue very frustrating?
Was refused Rosh Hashanah because I left the H off the end, but 'Tut' is accepted in every quiz that features Tutankhamun.
I mean, you could be about to write 'Tut and car moon' and you get a point but nothing for Rosh Hashana.
Just asking.
But other than everything you said, sure.
Those are the original names, so you should add them as correct. Not just the English variants.
They are original in most other languages.