To me, "landing" means touching down with the full landing gear, and ideally getting off the helicopter, stand outside and (optionally) have your celebration drink there before heading back. But here, it looks to me like the landing involved just touching the summit with the front of one of the runners. Not sure if I would recognize that as successful landing.
I think all they care about is whether they can accomplish what they want/need to do. Here's a Chinook hovering with just the tail touching the ground, allowing for transfer of personnel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN-mki1fHkM
"2010, a stripped-down AS350 B3 rescued three Spanish alpinists, one at a time, from the slopes of Annapurna I at 6,900 m (22,640 ft); this set a new record for the highest such rescue. The record was increased to 7,800 m (25,590 ft), during the rescue of Sudarshan Gautam between Camps III & IV in Everest's Yellow Band on the morning of 20 May 2013"
You're not going to get a nice helipad-sized area every time.
I thought it was more interesting seeing the approach to the Everest landing. I thought they had to use the updraft adjacent to the mountain to climb.
But apparently, the Sikorsky CH54 (the familiar "Skycrane"), has the record for highest level-flight at 36,120ft. https://winair.ca/blog/ultimate-guide-helicopter-world-records-infographic/
Parents who are really, really into Esperanto raise their kids to speak it as a first language by speaking Esperanto at home to the exclusion of other languages.
No but I have heard of an attempt with Klingon. I can't found the citation. http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/08/a-man-once-tried-to-raise-his-son-as-a-native-speaker-in-klingon/
There used to be a small country called Neutral Moresnet where Esperanto was official and a quarter of the people spoke it. It's not unlikely that at least one person raised their kid in Esperanto (and another language).
You could also be raised as bi- or tri-lingual if you are taught two or more languages at the same time. Say you have a Hungarian father and a Russian mother who don't really speak each other's language but can speak Esperanto to each other. You could be raised to speak Hungarian, Russian, and Esperanto at the same time. I have a couple friends who were raised speaking Slovenian or Serbian at home, English in public, and either Italian or German since they got Italian and/or Austrian TV and radio stations.
I agree. There is nation is which one can speak natively Esperanto with other nationals. If I live in the Germany and my Spanish parents teach me Spanish from birth, I am still not a native speaker, as I am not a native of Spain.
Yeah. What if that did happen? How many hundreds (or even thousands) of people would be required to keep quiet about it (not least the family of whatever poor sod croaked)? Too many, I’d venture…
Good quiz idea QM - pretty original. It's got me thinking about a practical way to get one's private jet/seaplane from the South to North pole in under 24 hours; it should be possible, I guess? (I got that one wrong.)
It's actually quite likely that Amelia Earhart's body was found, but those who found it didn't correctly identify her remains and discarded them, preventing DNA analysis. Washington Post article
I interpreted the crocodile one as killing being different from eating? Same way that usually pythons and anacondas kill people but then don't really eat them cause they can't.
I think it might be harder to find an accurate stat of who's been actually eaten instead of fatally injured, but it would make more sense imo.
Not really, that part of them is eaten, the person is not. If someone's toe was bitten off and eaten by a shark and they lived, you wouldn't say that person was "eaten by shark".
If someone tells you they've eaten a cake, they should mean an entire cake, not just a single slice.
I got South Pole to North pole correct because I thought that the distance was the circumference of the Earth rather than half of it. The Earth's circumference is 24901 miles, so I thought it would require a speed of 1038 mph.
But the distance from the North Pole to the South Pole is only half that, about 12450 miles. So it would entail an average speed of about 519 mph, which is doable. You'd probably need to refuel in the middle; but a Boeing 777 would only need 1 refueling which takes 1 hour, so you still have 23 hours and need to average 540 mph for the rest, which is doable.
In fact, someone has traveled from the North Pole to South Pole in less than 1 day, but they just didn't set foot. https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/speed-record-circumnavigate-intl-scli/index.html
But could you land and take-off from the North and South Poles in a 777, helicopter definitely, but then the speed would be a problem. At our current level in technology the only thing able to do this is probably a VTOL airplane with several in flight refuels.
Amelia Earhart's body almost certainly *has* been found, actually: https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/south-pacific/102113562/bones-discovered-on-a-pacific-island-belong-to-amelia-earhart-a-new-forensic-analysis-shows
Surely to speak a language 'as a native' one would have to be born in a nation that has said language as an intrisic part of its culture.No country holds espiranto in such regard.
He also drank milk and ate sugar and who knows what he ate when he wasn't being watched. Frankly, the question and the assertion are bullshit, no matter how many "essentially"s or "solid" qualifiers are added. Fasting "records" are stupid, and history is rife with hoaxes of people who have subsisted on "very little"--every single one of them was eating during the period of fasting, including Barbieri.
The guy lost an amount of weight commiserate with his time spent fasting. Surely the hoaxes you are referring to don't refer to a morbidly obese person losing hundreds of pounds.
I guess it depends what the daily caloric expenditure is of a 400lb man? (I think for normal people it's @1800-2200)
And how many calories is required to lose a pound of weight. (And how much fat vs muscle he lost)
Seems like the math could be:
382days * 2100cal/day deficit = 802,200cal
or 382days * 2600cal/day deficit = 993,200cal
total weight actually lost = 285lb, or 285lb*3500cal/lb= 997,500cal actually lost
If I follow that right, it seems like the numbers only add up if he was truly fasting. Not sure I am though. (and I don't care to look up conflicting numbers)
That’s not true, in fact, after 3 weeks is when you would actually start suffering, I think (Depending on how much body fat you have though). I’m assuming the guy was like sumo sized, and after a while of not having food, your body will actually start eating its own fat. (That’s why fat exists!)
While it was only about 0.02 seconds, Avdeyev technically time travelled into the past. He was a guy in space for about 2 years and time travelled, though I guess the definition depends on what you define time travelling. I would definitely say this scenario meets the given requirements.
But are they more than just stories?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXNXSvnCtKA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Delsalle
"2010, a stripped-down AS350 B3 rescued three Spanish alpinists, one at a time, from the slopes of Annapurna I at 6,900 m (22,640 ft); this set a new record for the highest such rescue. The record was increased to 7,800 m (25,590 ft), during the rescue of Sudarshan Gautam between Camps III & IV in Everest's Yellow Band on the morning of 20 May 2013"
You're not going to get a nice helipad-sized area every time.
I thought it was more interesting seeing the approach to the Everest landing. I thought they had to use the updraft adjacent to the mountain to climb.
But apparently, the Sikorsky CH54 (the familiar "Skycrane"), has the record for highest level-flight at 36,120ft. https://winair.ca/blog/ultimate-guide-helicopter-world-records-infographic/
No but I have heard of an attempt with Klingon. I can't found the citation. http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/08/a-man-once-tried-to-raise-his-son-as-a-native-speaker-in-klingon/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_jYOubJmfM
It's not like babies come with a predetermined language setting a birth that just kicks in depending on longitude and latitude.
"settings determined, executing default"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_of_Castelnau
I think it might be harder to find an accurate stat of who's been actually eaten instead of fatally injured, but it would make more sense imo.
If someone tells you they've eaten a cake, they should mean an entire cake, not just a single slice.
Same with a python in Indonesia, it ate an elderly lady. They killed the snake and found the woman inside.
I was wrong
But the distance from the North Pole to the South Pole is only half that, about 12450 miles. So it would entail an average speed of about 519 mph, which is doable. You'd probably need to refuel in the middle; but a Boeing 777 would only need 1 refueling which takes 1 hour, so you still have 23 hours and need to average 540 mph for the rest, which is doable.
In fact, someone has traveled from the North Pole to South Pole in less than 1 day, but they just didn't set foot. https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/speed-record-circumnavigate-intl-scli/index.html
So of course I changed all the Yesses to Noes thinking that this might be a trick quiz and.... I lost myself 4 correct answers yaaay
The guy lost an amount of weight commiserate with his time spent fasting. Surely the hoaxes you are referring to don't refer to a morbidly obese person losing hundreds of pounds.
And how many calories is required to lose a pound of weight. (And how much fat vs muscle he lost)
Seems like the math could be:
382days * 2100cal/day deficit = 802,200cal
or 382days * 2600cal/day deficit = 993,200cal
total weight actually lost = 285lb, or 285lb*3500cal/lb= 997,500cal actually lost
If I follow that right, it seems like the numbers only add up if he was truly fasting. Not sure I am though. (and I don't care to look up conflicting numbers)
It doesn't matter how heavy you are to start with. You will still die in about 3 weeks or so.