Highest grossing results are always skewed, because the cost of movie tickets is constantly increasing. One day, maybe someone will figure out revenue in terms of how many movie tickets were sold. Highest amount of tickets sold seems like a better indicator.
I think, adjusting for inflation, Gone with the Wind is the best-selling first-run movie of all-time, followed by the original Star Wars movie. Rocky Horror has sold a ton too, but people don't generally count that one because it relies on the ticket sales of the midnight screenings that have been playing regularly around the country for several decades.
hunt for red October only made 200 million world wide and seeing as this is a list for juts USA and the lowest on the list made 192 million in US alone its safe to say hunt for red October doesn't belong on this list
The Matrix was a pretty huge surprise cult hit, but it only made $174 million in the US. It made twice as much money overseas and also cleaned up in DVD sales. The Matrix Reloaded made significantly more but that didn't come out until 2003.
Reservoir Dogs was unknown when it came out. It only gained a following after Pulp Fiction. Jackie Brown is great, but it is not the kind of movie that makes a lot of money. It's slow and very talk-y. Even the violence isn't really violent (especially by Tarantino standards). A couple of people get shot off-screen. The lovebirds don't end up together. Doesn't check any of the boxes (being great is not any indication of making money, from what I've gathered). Pulp Fiction is a classic, but it's got too much personality to attract audiences as wide as the movies on the list (most of which quality as "high concept" -- they attract all different kinds of people from all walks of life).
yeah. Didn't stop Ben from working with Michael Bay again so his commentary track doesn't save him any more than Bill Murray for making A Tale of Two Kitties.
Sometimes they're in it just for the paycheck. Jeremy Irons made Dungeons & Dragons, after all. For that matter, Rob Pattinson has been extremely disdainful of the Twilight movies, and he ended up having to make five of those.
When Michael Caine was asked about his role in "Jaws: The Revenge," he said: "I have never seen it, but by all accounts it is terrible. However, I have seen the house that it built, and it is terrific."
A lot of movies on this list require suspension of disbelief. I've seen the aftermath of a few tornadoes and I can guarantee you don't go through a storm like that and emerge without a cut, but I still enjoyed Twister. I'm usually able to enjoy a show in spite of an implausible premise but I know everyone doesn't choose to. (Like my husband, an RN who ruins every medical show I try to watch, telling me how incorrect everything is they are doing.) I don't understand why movies like Toy Story with talking toys, or a robot from the future are plausible, but movies like Armageddon with men landing on a comet aren't. I just mentally block out the silly parts and enjoy the rest. Or are people complaining about the acting? Whatever, I enjoyed most of these.
I can suspend disbelief just fine as long as the movie is mostly internally consistent. If it takes place in the real world, though, and characters in the film are just making idiotic inexplicable decisions, then it's distracting. I mean I'm sure you understand this, too, Ander. Imagine if Woody showed up in the 3rd act of Armageddon. You would just say "oh, okay" or you'd be thinking, "what the hell?"
On top of that, bad acting, dumb + illogical + insulting script, awful direction, poor cinematography, cheesy + juvenile jokes, and so on. A far-fetched premise doesn't make a movie stupid if the story asks you to suspend disbelief about one or two things and then is otherwise consistent, that's fine... that's called fantasy. Michael Bay movies are not fantasy. They're just stupid.
It's rare for certain genres of film to make huge box office (comedies, romantic comedies, horror, "found footage," and sports movies, for example), but these types of films are also generally very cheap to produce, making them profitable enough to make more of them.
Highest Grossing Films by Genre
and by "fun little" I mean ambitious and perhaps overlong. But still good, imo
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/97423/top-ten-highest-grossing-films-adjusted-for-inflation
On top of that, bad acting, dumb + illogical + insulting script, awful direction, poor cinematography, cheesy + juvenile jokes, and so on. A far-fetched premise doesn't make a movie stupid if the story asks you to suspend disbelief about one or two things and then is otherwise consistent, that's fine... that's called fantasy. Michael Bay movies are not fantasy. They're just stupid.
But I'm surprised things like Ace Ventura didn't make the cut