There is a fantastic graduation speech by Adrian Tan to a group of students in Singapore, in which he says "Singapore has the third-longest life expectancy, behind only Monaco and Japan, and ahead of Iceland and San Marino. Do you know what these countries all have in common? Our football teams are hopeless. Fans are unlikely to be thrown in draining fits during a game. They are more likely to lulled into a gentle and restful nap." And that is the only reason I know the top five countries in this category.
Well I'm not as sexist as European football fans, so I watched them play. My grandmother and I saw their upset victory over the American team in the World Cup final. One of the only football games I've ever sat through in my life.
Our team isn't really "crap" though. Americans just dismiss anything we aren't the best at. The U.S. men's team consistently makes the World Cup, and has advanced to the knockout round several times in recent memory. Certainly, we're not close to competing with the likes of Germany, Brazil, Spain, Argentina, Italy, etc., but our team isn't terrible. We're a second-tier team.
And our women's team is probably the best in the world.
probably? probably?? The US women's soccer team is the most dominant football squad in the history of the game, period. Just since 1996, they've won FOUR Olympic gold medals and one silver. No men's football team has managed to do that and they've been playing men's football at the Olympics since 1900. Let that sink in. They've managed to get more medals in less than 20 years than ANY men's team has gotten in 120. They've also won the World Cup three times since the first Women's World Cup in 1991, and have NEVER not finished in the top 3. Again, something that no men's team has ever done.
And, considering that soccer is like the 20th most popular sport in the USA and nobody gives a crap, the men's team is outstanding. I mean in 2009 they beat Spain, the No. 1 team in the world. In 1998 they beat Brazil, also ranked No. 1 in the world. In 2010 their draw against England allowed them to win their group. They're not terrible. But they should be. Which makes them remarkable.
The reply button doesn't work for the post 2 down from here which seems to suggest that the US mens team punches above it's weight. Here are some figures:-
The number of participants in outdoor "soccer" in the US: 12 million.
The entire population of Belgium: 11 million
The entire population of Netherlands: 17 million.
Hence the suggestion that few play "soccer" in the US is not correct. There are more people playing it in the US than the entire population of the country ranked number 1 in the world.
most of those 12 million people playing it in the US are 5-8 year old girls, though. If someone in the US has any athletic talent at all, they tend to play something else. It's a relevant point.
I know the U.S. has a different lifestyle and all, but it is a shame we can't seem to get on the list with all the modern medicines we have. Also, as a side note, I wonder where Finland ranks. I don't think it would be that far away because Sweden and Norway are on here.
Have you checked the price of those modern medicines? I am on two tier-three drugs for an auto-immune disorder which cost me $241 out-of-pocket each until I reach my yearly deductible - after that they cost $64 per prescription. It's not easy for retirees and others who are on those modern drugs. (That's after paying the monthly charges of $134 for required Medicare Part B, $188 for required supplemental insurance, and $33 for the drug plan.) If it weren't for modern medical science I wouldn't be alive today, so I'm grateful for that, but it is expensive just to stay alive in America. What angers me is that those same drugs can be purchased in other countries for much less.
Those modern medicines cost obscene amounts, which is why so many more people die early than they should; they simply can't afford the high prices of medicine from greedy companies.
There is a very high correlation between life expectancy and GDP per capita. Although, @kalbahamut, you'll be disappointed to know that life expectancy correlates slightly more strongly with PPP GDP than with nominal GDP.
Why would I be disappointed? I'm absolutely not wrong about the fact that it is incredibly silly to measure a whole nation's overall GDP in terms of PPP... but PPP DOES make sense used in other ways, for example, in measuring the ability of people within a country to obtain healthcare.... THEN it actually makes a lot of sense to look at PPP per capita.
I never asserted PPP was useless or meaningless. It has its uses. For measuring things like poverty, or minimum wages, which of course correlates to the ability of people to purchase healthcare or basic necessities like shelter and baseline nutrition. It is misused when trying to apply it to the total size of a country's economy, though.
That's really not why the world wants Israel to stop cramming the natives of the country into an embargoed pocket of poverty. Quit using the knee jerk defense.
Those countries don't eat very good food probably lol
Also notice that most of these countries are next to the sea. A fish based diet should help apparently. Notice how Spain and Italy rank so high compared to the rest of Europe even tho their income isn't on top.
Comparison with the 20 most wealthy countries (by median wealth and assuming high wealth for Monaco, San Marino, and Andorra): Belgium, UK, and Austria are missing and instead Sweden, Israel, and Norway (just the 21st most wealthy country -wtf?!) are on the list. In short, the wealthier the older.
I wonder if Monaco’s average is skewed by the number of non-native residents? It would be interesting to see how they calculate the average and whether or not the result is weighted to take into account factors which may not be as relevant to other countries. My first question would be: how many of them are born, or die, in Monaco itself? Or would they have to discount all of the ‘foreign’ residents that do either, and just base the data on native births and deaths? Is Monaco even big enough to have a maternity ward? :-D
After the first couple, the differences between these countries becomes pretty trivial, and this trend continues on down the list past the 20th spot...
You're probably one of the very few in the world that don't know we have a top ranked universal healthcare system. I could get my leg bitten off by a croc and wouldn't have to pay a cent at the hospital. It's a marvellous system.
Interesting that Southern European states France, Italy, Spain make the list, while economically stronger Northern European states like Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, Sweden don't.
please fix the quiz, israel is not a country. it's the zionist entity that's living in PALESTINE. Ironically they're "living long" but shortening new borns' lives in Palestine everyday for the past 75 years.
I missed Italy, France and Spain. I got everything else, but somehow managed to miss three of the biggest countries in Europe. I think the dementia’s setting in.
And our women's team is probably the best in the world.
And, considering that soccer is like the 20th most popular sport in the USA and nobody gives a crap, the men's team is outstanding. I mean in 2009 they beat Spain, the No. 1 team in the world. In 1998 they beat Brazil, also ranked No. 1 in the world. In 2010 their draw against England allowed them to win their group. They're not terrible. But they should be. Which makes them remarkable.
The number of participants in outdoor "soccer" in the US: 12 million.
The entire population of Belgium: 11 million
The entire population of Netherlands: 17 million.
Hence the suggestion that few play "soccer" in the US is not correct. There are more people playing it in the US than the entire population of the country ranked number 1 in the world.
Also, in most cases micronations rank high because the old people from other nations go there to live
Also notice that most of these countries are next to the sea. A fish based diet should help apparently. Notice how Spain and Italy rank so high compared to the rest of Europe even tho their income isn't on top.
Please include other spellings from Liechtenstein as many people could get that wrong
Edit and of course, no siesta's!
First of all look at USA crime
healthcare is not free
Monaco is very rich country
"Try to the 20 countries with the highest life expectancies at birth." I assume you meant "Try to guess the [...]"?