Both Venice and Genoa (there were some smaller cities lead by doges too) were lead by doges, so you should add something to show that the answer your looking for is Venice and Zadar is also a Christian city, sacked by the Fourth Crusade. In my opinion, you should correct your quiz.
Oh, so that's why Genoa worked when I was guessing random Italian cities. I was trying to work out what connected two cities on opposite sides of Italy.
Got 100%. Maybe you should accept the Sandwich Islands as a type-in. That's what Cook named the islands, before we reverted to using the indigenous name.
It does accept haudenosaunee. You have to spell it correctly which is always a problem for me, so I copied and pasted it. Someday, when people have taken the time to learn what indigenous groups actual names are, it will accept Haundenosaunee or 6 Nations but not Iroquois.
Nit picking, but Gutenberg invented the movable type for printing presses, as well as other innovations. Printing presses had used blocks of wood carved for each page prior to his contribution.
Easy, you're discovering it for your own cultural consciousness. There's no etymological or logical difficulty in the same thing being discovered multiple times.
The feats of exploration and discovery by the polynesians were truly incredible. If we knew who first discovered Hawaii I'm sure they'd be justly celebrated.
He discovered it because neither he nor anyone from his culture had known about it before.
Just like the ruins of ancient city of Pompeii were discovered when people who did it were obviously not the first people ever to have known about the city, because someone had built it and lived there before.
Or William Herschel would still have discovered Uranus even if there had already been intelligent species living there.
The act of discovering something is almost always relative to your own state of knowledge. It's about finding something out on your own rather than learning from someone else.
Look out the definitions of the word "to discover" in dictionaries. To do something as the first human being ever is not the only possible way to understand and use this word. And if it were, we could well never use it because it's almost always impossible to prove nobody has seen or thought about something before you.
Just because a word can be used this way doesnt mean there arent better or worse uses. In this case the use of the word promotes a European/Western first mentality that if things werent 'discovered' by them then they might as well not exist. If this site is meant to cater to everyone, it makes sense that for someone native to Hawaii it is not a 'discovery' like it is for someone from England. If the site wants neutral and factually correct language then it shouldn't use discover here.
A futher point is that this use of the word is historically ingrained with problematic histories of imperialism, violence, and colonialism - so people are understandably sensitive to it. It is easy to just change the wording to 'found' or 'stumbled upon' and simultaneously recognize that people had been there long before Cook 'discovered' it for only a fraction of the world.
Haudenosaunee should be accepted for Iroquois. It's what they call themselves. It's perhaps a Canadian/American thing, but in Canada this group refers to itself as 6 Nations or Haudenosaunee, not Iroquois.
Johannes Gutenberg did not invent the printing press in Europe. What Gutenberg did was:
- to introduce the movable-type technology in europe (which allowed more latitue with creating the printing text, and was a huge improvement on the diversity of texts to be printed)
- related to the above, Gutenberg also created new metal alloys for the formation of the mechanical types to be sued to form the letters. These were more durable and did not break when the pressed on the paper, also a considerable improvement.
Now it's Istanbul, not Constantinople
Been a long time gone, oh Constantinople
Why did Constantinople get the works?
That's nobody's business but the Turks
Is there a reason not to accept it's current name?
The feats of exploration and discovery by the polynesians were truly incredible. If we knew who first discovered Hawaii I'm sure they'd be justly celebrated.
Just like the ruins of ancient city of Pompeii were discovered when people who did it were obviously not the first people ever to have known about the city, because someone had built it and lived there before.
Or William Herschel would still have discovered Uranus even if there had already been intelligent species living there.
The act of discovering something is almost always relative to your own state of knowledge. It's about finding something out on your own rather than learning from someone else.
A futher point is that this use of the word is historically ingrained with problematic histories of imperialism, violence, and colonialism - so people are understandably sensitive to it. It is easy to just change the wording to 'found' or 'stumbled upon' and simultaneously recognize that people had been there long before Cook 'discovered' it for only a fraction of the world.
- to introduce the movable-type technology in europe (which allowed more latitue with creating the printing text, and was a huge improvement on the diversity of texts to be printed)
- related to the above, Gutenberg also created new metal alloys for the formation of the mechanical types to be sued to form the letters. These were more durable and did not break when the pressed on the paper, also a considerable improvement.