The Shakespeare question is odd, as it is in fact not clear whether he was the author. And even though it is just a meta question which asks for the "believe" of the majority of scholars: This may heavily depend on who counts as a scholar, right?
"On 22 April 2007, The New York Times published a survey of 265 American Shakespeare professors on the Shakespeare authorship question. To the question of whether there is good reason to question Shakespeare's authorship, 6 per cent answered "yes", and 11 percent "possibly". When asked their opinion of the topic, 61 per cent chose "A theory without convincing evidence" and 32 per cent chose "A waste of time and classroom distraction"."
I am willing to bet that the percentages would be even lower among UK scholars. Now it is certainly true and accepted that he did not write or contributed little to several plays (Henry VI, Titus Andronicus, Pericles), but that is a different question.
Thanks for adding a source to who scholars refers to! This answers the very specific question on the believe of the majority. And I am not arguing that the very topic is false. But it is a bit lame to persist in absolute truth for any side when you can not prove it. This is not like climate change where you have literally tons of scientific observations. Anyway. Case closed. ;-)
The German invasion of Greece in 1941 led Winston Churchill to curtail a successful campaign in North Africa in order to send troops to Greece. The German overran Greece anyway and captured Crete as well, with heavy losses to British troops and ships.
I too would not have know about the Nazis invading Greece had I not read a really interesting (and kinda sad) novel about the occupation and its long aftermath. For anyone interested, it’s called My Last Lament by James William Brown (Berkeley Books, 2017).
About the dinosaur question: humans actually are partly responsible. Birds are dinosaurs (not just descended from them, they technically ARE dinosaurs, check Wikipedia), and humans did bring some of them to extinction.
So this question made me wonder how technical/specific to be. Could it be worded differently? For example, by specifying it’s about non-avian dinosaurs.
You thought wrong. "Black powder" is just another term for gunpowder, and regardless of whatever improvements may have been made to it later, it was unequivocally invented in China first.
Seven percent of respondents thought that humans were partially responsible for the extinction of dinosaurs... let's all just take that in for a second.
I was hoping someone else would notice and be alarmed by that! Surely all 7% of those people weren’t talking about our wiping out, for instance, the dodos, but I do applaud those who took the question that literally. I am always reminding people that dinosaurs are not all extinct!
Nitpicking, but Vikings should be the first recorded Europeans to have sailed to the Americas. It's entirely possible, and even likely that at least one fishing ship had gone far astray beforehand. The Vikings are just the first to have survived AND returned AND told people about it.
For the French in Russia question, why? For diplomatic/ambassadorial reasons or because of emerging intellectual overlap and French scholars teaching in Russia?
French was the lingua franca of Europe until the latter half of the nineteenth century, thanks to France being the most powerful country back then. It's kind of like how most elites today are expected to know English for business, diplomacy, etc.
What's more interesting to me is the origin of the term 'lingua franca.' It means "Frankish language" in Italian, and was the name of a common pidgin for traders in the Mediterranean from the eleventh to nineteenth centuries. You might know the language as Sabir.
The lady in Mary Poppins did not sing, "Feed the dinosaurs, tuppence a bag." The question's pretty clear it's not about dodos and passenger pigeons, isn't it?
I am willing to bet that the percentages would be even lower among UK scholars. Now it is certainly true and accepted that he did not write or contributed little to several plays (Henry VI, Titus Andronicus, Pericles), but that is a different question.
So this question made me wonder how technical/specific to be. Could it be worded differently? For example, by specifying it’s about non-avian dinosaurs.
What's more interesting to me is the origin of the term 'lingua franca.' It means "Frankish language" in Italian, and was the name of a common pidgin for traders in the Mediterranean from the eleventh to nineteenth centuries. You might know the language as Sabir.