That question is probably too hard, I apologize. Most people would only think of the Six-Day War and Yom Kippur War. But Israel was also invaded by several Arab nations on the day after they declared independence in 1948. Lebanon sent a small force of 436 soldiers to join the fray.
The Shakespeare question is odd, as it is in fact not clear whether he was the author. And even though it is just a meta question which asks for the "believe" of the majority of scholars: This may heavily depend on who counts as a scholar, right?
"On 22 April 2007, The New York Times published a survey of 265 American Shakespeare professors on the Shakespeare authorship question. To the question of whether there is good reason to question Shakespeare's authorship, 6 per cent answered "yes", and 11 percent "possibly". When asked their opinion of the topic, 61 per cent chose "A theory without convincing evidence" and 32 per cent chose "A waste of time and classroom distraction"."
I am willing to bet that the percentages would be even lower among UK scholars. Now it is certainly true and accepted that he did not write or contributed little to several plays (Henry VI, Titus Andronicus, Pericles), but that is a different question.
Thanks for adding a source to who scholars refers to! This answers the very specific question on the believe of the majority. And I am not arguing that the very topic is false. But it is a bit lame to persist in absolute truth for any side when you can not prove it. This is not like climate change where you have literally tons of scientific observations. Anyway. Case closed. ;-)
I was confused by the Chinese WWII question. I wasn't sure if it was supposed to include the cino-japanese war in WWII, because technically it's not the same, but also technically it is part of it... ? Sooo now I'm also wodering if I'm remembering right, did they also take part in fighting in the bigger conflict ?
It doesn't matter. They fought in China which was part of the Pacific Theater. Consider this: would you say that Russia didn't "really" fight in WWII because they didn't fight in China?
That was one of the many China at the time. If anything, that was the least ligament of all since it was basically a Japanese puppet. I think most mentions of "China" focusing on WWII mean the Republic of China
The Chinese fought (without much success) against Japan from 1941-1945. The Flying Tigers fought as part of the Nationalist China Air Force. China was a participant in the Cairo Conference in 1943. The first B-29 raids against Japan were launched from air bases in China.
The German invasion of Greece in 1941 led Winston Churchill to curtail a successful campaign in North Africa in order to send troops to Greece. The German overran Greece anyway and captured Crete as well, with heavy losses to British troops and ships.
I too would not have know about the Nazis invading Greece had I not read a really interesting (and kinda sad) novel about the occupation and its long aftermath. For anyone interested, it’s called My Last Lament by James William Brown (Berkeley Books, 2017).
About the dinosaur question: humans actually are partly responsible. Birds are dinosaurs (not just descended from them, they technically ARE dinosaurs, check Wikipedia), and humans did bring some of them to extinction.
So this question made me wonder how technical/specific to be. Could it be worded differently? For example, by specifying it’s about non-avian dinosaurs.
Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948. On May 15, Britain gave up their mandate of Palestine and withdrew. At that point Israel was a de facto sovereign state. They were immediately invaded by the Arab League which sought to destroy the new state and drive the Jews into the sea, but the Arab League failed. JetPunk places reality higher than UN recognition, which is why they recognize the sovereignty of Kosovo and Taiwan but not of Palestine. International recognition is only one component of sovereignty, and it's possible to be recognized with or without the UN.
it's amazing how opaque the blind spots are for people who want to believe a certain narrative. Like those who want to believe that Israel is always the antagonist act like the country didn't exist until after the '48 armistice or maybe only after the Arab League invaders started losing territory. Or when people talk about there being no terrorist attacks on US soil during the Bush presidency... who only start counting *after* 9/11. Or those that like to say that there have been more casualties from "white terrorism" than Islamic in the US, they also conveniently start counting from the same date.
My definitions are most often the ones found in the dictionary. The first one for country found on google is "a nation with its own government, occupying a particular territory." Nothing in there about UN recognition. If you don't recognize that Israel existed as a country until 1949 that makes you even more extreme than the people I was alluding to in my previous comment.
The Israeli government was formed March 8 1949, according to the Israeli government itself: https://www.knesset.gov.il/govt/eng/GovtByNumber_eng.asp?govt=1
The question about the Inca written language infused me because I wasn't sure what counted as being written. Maybe trying to find a way to reword the question to clarify it would be useful.
They invaded Greek Macedonia, which was and still is part of Greece, from the north. Greece was invaded also in the south by Italy and in the east by Bulgaria.
That was the Italians. The Germans occupied a few small areas - several islands and part of the north - until they took everything over in 1943. Says Wikipedia!
Seven percent of respondents thought that humans were partially responsible for the extinction of dinosaurs... let's all just take that in for a second.
I was hoping someone else would notice and be alarmed by that! Surely all 7% of those people weren’t talking about our wiping out, for instance, the dodos, but I do applaud those who took the question that literally. I am always reminding people that dinosaurs are not all extinct!
I don't know what Flat-Earthers believe about humanity's role in the extinction of the dinosaurs, as Flat-Earth theory doesn't apply, but I do know what Biblical creationists believe about it. Biblical creationism would say that some dinosaurs survived the biblical flood, but died out afterwards, maybe due to hunting. Modern evolutionist answers are considered to be correct for general quizzes, however.
The Inca did have a writing system, but they did not have an alphabet. A writing system does not have to be phonetic to qualify, or be restricted to paper/clay. Their system is called Quipu (sometimes also transliterated as Khipu), and uses a scheme of knotted strings; it is still in use today. While it was commonly used for accounting, new research has revealed that it was also used to write letters and community constitutions. It would be excellent and appreciated if you could amend the clue or replace the question entirely. (Even if you replace "writing system" with "alphabet," it still may help perpetuate misunderstandings of Indigenous knowledge-keeping and transmission.)
I know about Quipu (useful Scrabble word by the way!) but I don't like it as a writing system. It's a system of coding information, but as far as I know it wasn't used to produce sentences or other grammatical structures.
That said, I can see how it might be debatable, so I changed the question to one that is not.
The occupying Greece question is a little hard to answer. As the question words it, it states that the Nazis "occupied" Greece. The control of occupation shifted much, with Italy maintaining control of most of the islands that were captured and the coast of the mainland, while Germany only really administered small chunks further inland
So yes, the Nazis occupied Greece in WWII. Maybe not all of it, but enough for it to be considered an occupation.
And as a note for the quiz creator, I'd probably reword it to "invaded Greece" since that more accurately represents what happened
Nitpicking, but Vikings should be the first recorded Europeans to have sailed to the Americas. It's entirely possible, and even likely that at least one fishing ship had gone far astray beforehand. The Vikings are just the first to have survived AND returned AND told people about it.
We've only found Viking remains, and the Americas are not especially dangerous. The fishing boat idea is nice and all, but the present answer is correct for now.
For the French in Russia question, why? For diplomatic/ambassadorial reasons or because of emerging intellectual overlap and French scholars teaching in Russia?
I am willing to bet that the percentages would be even lower among UK scholars. Now it is certainly true and accepted that he did not write or contributed little to several plays (Henry VI, Titus Andronicus, Pericles), but that is a different question.
So this question made me wonder how technical/specific to be. Could it be worded differently? For example, by specifying it’s about non-avian dinosaurs.
That said, I can see how it might be debatable, so I changed the question to one that is not.
So yes, the Nazis occupied Greece in WWII. Maybe not all of it, but enough for it to be considered an occupation.
And as a note for the quiz creator, I'd probably reword it to "invaded Greece" since that more accurately represents what happened