Based on my short cladistical analysis, Panthera tigris (Tiger) is more ancient than Panthera leo (Lion). This is due to lions being more steps away from the base of Panthera than tigers
True, but the Qaran isn't, so most people won't be able to compare the dates. Meanwhile whilst Dickens isn't as well studied as Shakespeare there have been enough adaptations of his books (Oliver, Christmas Carol etc.) that most people will know he's Victorian.
I'm not convinced they would, the average person on the street knows next to nothing about Islam. In 2019 Pew research surveyed 11,000 Americans and gave a multiple choice question asking what religion Ramadan came from - only 60% got it right.
I think that, past a certain point, it's hard for people to contextualize the past. Most people have encountered at least a little Shakespeare and Dickens, even if only through parody or reference, and can probably tell just by looking at the speech and costuming that Shakespeare is much older than Dickens. (Consider the standard interpretations of Romeo & Juliet and A Christmas Carol, for example). The Bible and Quran are so old that most people can't meaningfully distinguish based on context clues which is older. They're both more a thousand years old. Most people can't discern between the fashion and language of 100 AD vs. 700 AD.
It makes sense. Insects are capable of existing without flowers, but most flowers can't function without insects. Flowers couldn't evolve if there were no insects already present.
But there are heaps of flowers that function without insects - all grasses flower, for example, but very few (if any?) of them are pollinated by insects. Likewise as far as I'm aware trees are much more often pollinated by wind than by insects. So how did plants reproduce before flowers were around? Did everything have rhizomes or what? I suppose I could just look it up rather than blathering on here...
...Turns out Wikipedia, or at least what I can make out through its incorrigibly opaque style, thinks it was about a mixture of spores and self-pollination. So there we are.
I liked all of them except for the Armstrong/Davis question. They were born 25 years apart and died 20 years apart. You need to specifically know jazz history to know who came first among people who were alive at the same time.
right... because the authors of the Old Testament clearly knew a lot about radiation, ionized plasma and ancient cosmology and that's probably what they were referring to. Makes sense to bring this up in a conversation about the order that things appeared on planet Earth, too.
That's a bit like rubbishing stone-age man's knowledge of gravity because he hadn't read Einstein. The fact that they didn't understand it in a modern scientific sense doesn't imply that they couldn't say anything correct about it.
The more rational observation to make about this particular issue is that it's remarkable the writers of Genesis somehow had this insight that was far ahead of its time - that light is something that exists apart from the heavenly bodies and artificial sources.
(Obviously there is much to be said against that, but it at least makes more sense than insisting no-one knows anything who can't describe it in terms of physics)
Easy - Quantum Mechanics. Sliced bread (in a package) wasn't invented until the late 1920's. Einstein wrote his four famous papers in 1905, which formed the foundation for general relativity, Brownian motion, quantum mechanics, and mass-energy equivalence. By 1924, quantum mechanics had been pretty well formalized into the set of ideas we still use to define it today (although, like any branch of science, it's grown quite a bit since then).
Brain Surgery. The first successful removal of a tumor from the brain was in 1887, and the first liquid fueled rocket was made by Robert Goddard in 1926.
"Very popular to some people" is a contradiction. Actually, the movie is a bit of a niche cult semi-classic for more or less recent generations. If that sounds very specific, it's cause it is. The movie is not really popular at all, except apparently here in Jetpunk, as I've seen it in quizzes more times than it merits.
I also had a flashback from that movie. On my part it is because we were taught in school in Finland, that the machine that flies is "aeroplane" (in Finnish it is lentokone, literally flying machine). When I was a child, word "Airplane" (with capital letter) was always connected to that movie, and I wondered, how it is written (and I of course thought that it is logical with word "air" as part of it). It was long before I learned about spelling differences in British and American English.
The photo is related to the first question. According to Google/ Wikipedia, it's from the Three Barons Renaissance Fair in Anchorage. File here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lady_at_Three_Barons_Renaissance_Fair_Anchorage_(IMG_7768a).jpg
Good questions! Quite shocked only 40% got the insect flower question right though!
The 8% that thought the middle ages were very recent was a bit surprising too. Did they think the middle ages went right up to wwII. Or did they think the rennaissance was shortly after the year 0? (to keep religion out of this, but I am sure someone will bring it right back in ;) )
Not really. There's no reason to specify that you mean Louis Armstrong came before Miles Davis from a natality perspective or that the Middle Ages came before the Renaissance from a historical perspective. There's no "perspective" in which flowering plants appeared before insects. From a temporal perspective, from which the word "before" takes its meaning.
...Turns out Wikipedia, or at least what I can make out through its incorrigibly opaque style, thinks it was about a mixture of spores and self-pollination. So there we are.
The more rational observation to make about this particular issue is that it's remarkable the writers of Genesis somehow had this insight that was far ahead of its time - that light is something that exists apart from the heavenly bodies and artificial sources.
(Obviously there is much to be said against that, but it at least makes more sense than insisting no-one knows anything who can't describe it in terms of physics)
(actually this will make it easier to remember for me)
and almost existed before insects but we're 50 million years away.
PS. Woman's photo on front page, in which question is she connected to?
The 8% that thought the middle ages were very recent was a bit surprising too. Did they think the middle ages went right up to wwII. Or did they think the rennaissance was shortly after the year 0? (to keep religion out of this, but I am sure someone will bring it right back in ;) )