Not including a brief pass through southern Ontario, Paris was the first destination of the first trip I ever took overseas. I was with a large group of other American travellers (extended family members). In addition to having awful opinions about where the group should visit next, and taking for-fricking-ever to mobilize and get moving, many in the group couldn't stop complaining about what I saw as completely trivial nonsense like dog poop on the sidewalks, crowds of tourists at the popular sites, and random Parisians being rude to them. After a couple days of this I decided I'd had enough, abandoned the group, and went off on my own. Never made the mistake of traveling in a large group again. And I absolutely loved the city - feel sorry for anyone who gets there and only sees the negative.
Ironic that they complained about tourists at famous sites, while being tourists at those very sites. The rude Frenchman stereotype is very funny indeed, and the dog poo - hilarious. Why should the Parisians pick up after their dogs anymore or less than the British or Americans. You may have had a bad few days but I think a great TV Show episodes could be made out of this.
yeah, actually, James, though I don't mind it so much myself.. most Americans these days really do pick up their own dog poop. You might see them walking around with a little plastic bag after their dog. But it depends on the place.. in some places in the US the dogs will just poop in the grass and leave it.
In Paris when I was there it seemed like the common procedure was for the people walking their dogs to let them poop on the sidewalk wherever they wanted, and then periodically shopkeepers would come out with hoses to wash the poo into the gutters... seemed like a fine system to me. And I agree tourists complaining about tourists is ridiculous.
I've never seen the word 'equip' used in that way. He equipped his car with seat belts, she chose to equip her car with stereo speakers, they wanted to equip their kitchen with...
About half of these I've never seen here before (got them all anyway). I seem to see the ones repeatedly. Is that an algorithm thing or just random chance?
Gotta be honest, the fact seat belt was not accpeted without the S is ridiculous. I can't count the times i've typed in an answer and it was accepted before even finishing the answer and I end up typing in for the next answer without even realizing. I then go to the next question without even looking and end up wasting time having to delete everything. On a timed quiz, this is simply unacceptable. If it's standard practice to do this, then seal belt in the singular should have been accepted.
Can you add "seat belt" for "seat belts"? The plural seems unnecessary and guessing "seat belt" then seeing the answer was just your answer but plural is quite frustrating.
I thought it would be funny if a Japanese tavern trained pandas to serve food, and I got another question right!
I also enjoyed daydreaming about all the things that kelp is not: it's not a sport, it's not a weapon, it's not a vehicle, it's not a dog, it's not a theory, it's not a diaper.........
The one for Paris Syndrome is really funny for some reasons
In Paris when I was there it seemed like the common procedure was for the people walking their dogs to let them poop on the sidewalk wherever they wanted, and then periodically shopkeepers would come out with hoses to wash the poo into the gutters... seemed like a fine system to me. And I agree tourists complaining about tourists is ridiculous.
I also enjoyed daydreaming about all the things that kelp is not: it's not a sport, it's not a weapon, it's not a vehicle, it's not a dog, it's not a theory, it's not a diaper.........