Can NIS (New Israeli Shekel) and ILS (the ISO code for Israel's currency) also be accepted for the question about currency? To be pedantic, a shekel is an ancient unit of weight, while the currency of Israel is one of the above.
I think this is just a play on "Israel" looking so much like "Is real." I remember a teacher showing us that in like third grade. I think she just thought it was funny. Or maybe she was pushing Zionism on us.
Well that’s kinda rude. Although I agree that Palestine’s current tactic is not working. I honestly believe that both groups have valid claims to the land and deserve to be countries in their own right. I just don’t know how we would go about that.
honestly yeah but i do think israel deserved to come back after years to take it back, palestine still hasa chance they just havent risen yet because most people just spam #freepalestine in the comments section on every thing that actually has comments instead of actually going to help serve for them and uprise for them, in my opinion palestinians doing that would just feel kind of stupid because saying #freepalestine once isnt going to make a difference, kind of the same with calling israel trash or isnotreal, isfake, etc because its stupid youre not doing anything to offend israels government or help palestine just become stronger on just one comment
It's the other way around - Palestine is Israeli land. It was the homeland of the Jews for over 1,000 years until a colonizing and conquering Roman emperor, Hadrian, threw them out and changed the land's name to Syria Palestina. He did this to effectively "de-Jewify" the place and tell the Jews "Don't ever come back!"
Well, now the Jews are back and have re-adopted the earlier name of the place before Roman colonization (and, of course, LONG before the Muslim Conquest of the 7th century).
Ah yes, the Mossad. That agency that shot Kennedy because he wanted to monitor the Dimona nuclear power plant if it produced nuclear weapons or not (it did and still does).
That would just invite a very hostile debate in the comments. QM seems content to let things proceed at a low simmer, but people aren't really welcome to get into very ugly politics. Which is for the best, I think.
Can I quote you on this next time someone in another comments section posts something like "we get it Kal. You hate Conservatives and Republicans. Give it a rest already!" open your mind and learn to think for yourself. And I've been commenting a lot less the past couple of months but might be hard for you to notice as there are comments on many quizzes going back to 2012.
Finally, there is nothing "progressive" about Pablo's comment above. Israel is by far the most progressive country in the Middle East. There's nothing progressive about wishing for it to be overrun by violent tribalists who are very much less progressive than the Israelis. It's just good ol' regular anti-semitism by a different name and of a slightly different flavor, filtered and distilled through various intermediaries starting with Husayni, al-Banna, Nasser and Arafat, working its way through Habash, Guevara, the UN and Newton, delivered to your doorstep by Chomsky, Foucault, Sarsour, et al.
If you want to see how a real progressive views these issues look up some books, videos, essays, TED Talks or whatever by any of the following... Sam Harris, Maajid Nawaz, Sarah Haider (not as well regarded as an intellectual but still good), Christopher Hitchens or Richard Dawkins (not true progressives in any sense but still very liberal), Reza Aslan (I wouldn't highly recommend his take, though still better than those I listed above), or Aayan Hirsi Ali (not very progressive, but again, better than those listed in the previous comment). Harris and Nawaz is a good starting point. They have a much better grasp of progressive values as they relate to the Muslim world than most self-described progressives do these days. And they don't engage in the casual and sinister racism of low expectations and cultural relativism - which is not progressive at all.
bro i said this a million times on a bunch of other comments, both are real places and also saying something to offend israel and help palestine just by saying #freepalestine wont do anything because palestine is still the same thing, if you actually want to help palestine serve for them and actually fight israel
What about the Fatimids, or the Rashiduns, or the Umayyads, or the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem? Surely they have perfectly valid claims to the land too?
Israel the country was established in 1948, but has been a kingdom since ancient times, you know, until the Ottomans conquered it, and then England secured it during the crusades and after WW1, before making it its own nation in '48
You missed a HUGE chunk of history there.... the original Kingdom of Israel broke apart into two successor states: Israel/Samaria and Judah. The northern kingdom was conquered by the Neo-Assyrians. Then both were conquered by the Neo-Babylonians. Then the Egyptians again. Then the Babylonians again. Then the Persians. Then Seleucia. Then the independent Jewish Hasmonean kingdom sprung up. Then the Romans. There was a short-lived Jewish kingdom that revolted against the Romans that was destroyed by Vespasian and Titus. After that the area stopped being called Judah and was renamed Palestine. Roman Empire broke into two so then it was the Byzantines. Then the Persians again. Then the Byzantines again. Then the Arab Rashiduns. Then the Umayyads. Then the Abbasids. Then the Mamluks, Fatimids, Seljuqs, Fatimids again, Christian Crusaders, Ayyubids, more Crusaders, more Ayyubids, Crusaders, Ayyubids, Mamluks again, and finally the Ottomans. and then the British.
This is somewhat comparable to relating the history of England as such:
there were many disunified indigenous tribes there until the Romans moved in, and then, you know, David Cameron put Brexit to a vote and so the UK withdrew from the Roman Empire.
Except in your case add an additional 500 years to the unexplained gap. :)
But this does put a nice spotlight on the huge and baffling blank spot most Westerners have in their heads when it comes to the history of this extremely important region...
Israel has always been in some kind of conflict, From being conquered by Egypt, to Battling the Philistines, to getting conquered by Babylon, to having many people fleeing and moving to Persia, to being conquered BY the Persians, to being conquered by the Greeks, to being conquered by the Romans, to being conquered by the Byzantine Empire, by being conquered by Islamic people "from the east", to being conquered by the Ottomans, to being a British colony, to becoming a free country, to literally fighting everyone around them, (Six days and Yom Kippur), to now having a little De Facto state on their back, named the West Bank, or Palestine
it would make sense from a logistical, security, and diplomatic standpoint. Though it would cost a lot of money for something that is really kind of masturbatory and pointless. It should not have been moved from Tel Aviv in the first place. That's the sort of thing only an ignorant orange-tinted fool would think was a good idea. But since it's there already... y'know... whatever.
He has said that Israel has a right to exist and defend itself. Which they do. Not much of a defense of Israel, but it will get painted as such by those hypocrites and religious bigots who feel Israel does not have a right to exist. US policy since the Kennedy administration has been generally favorable and supportive toward Israel, though usually quite even handed when compared to policy toward Jordan, Egypt, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc. And Biden is a mainstream center-left Democrat who has been in politics since 1972. Wouldn't expect any radical changes in direction coming from him.
and I don't expect Biden or any similarly centrist and pragmatic US president in the future to move the embassy again, either. Moving it in the first place was stupid, unnecessary, expensive, and contrary to US interests. It invited controversy and criticism for zero gain. But... once the embassy is located somewhere... nobody really cares anymore. It disappears from political relevance. Moving it again would invite more criticism and controversy, incur more expense, and net the US a similarly negligible or non-existent level of benefit. Moving it in either direction is just pandering to one group of people or the other. And while Biden certainly is not above pandering, I really don't think he will in this case as his pragmatism usually wins out over his impulse to pander.
bro i said this a million times on a bunch of other comments, both are real places and also saying something to offend israel and help palestine just by saying #freepalestine wont do anything because palestine is still the same thing, if you actually want to help palestine serve for them and actually fight israel
I LITERALLY COPIED AND PASTED THIS FOR ANOTHER GUY WHO DOESNT UNDERSTNAD THIS IS MY SECOND TIME SAYING IT WHAT THE HECK, IT WAS ALSO ON THIS QUIZ
Should accept "NIS" (New Israeli Shekel) for the currency, it is the name of Israel's currency and the acronym is used both officially and colloquially.
I’m sure these comments will be incredibly peaceful and people wont be yelling their opinions so loud that quizmaster will have to lock comments on a quiz site.
Can you guys just stop putting your political views in this quiz? JetPunk is supposed to be a quiz website, not a website where people talk and argue about politics. If you want to put your views on JetPunk, find a different site like Reddit. JetPunk is not the place for this kind of stuff.
"The capital of Israel according to Israel", that's just childish.
We're gonna do that for all the countries now? The capital of France according to France is Paris. The capital of Costa Rica according to Costa Rica is San Jose.
The sheer cognitive dissonance required to believe a geography-centred website can isolate itself from any political discourse or discussion is laughable, especially when said discourse involves the first livestreamed genocide.
Anyone who can say with conviction that this country "deserves to exist" is either completely disillusioned and has been conditioned by decades of propaganda, which they desperately need to unpack, or is simply evil and soulless. If you oppose colonialism in any way, shape or form, then open your eyes to the clear reality going on in front of you. Genocide is indefensible, and this is undoubtedly a genocide. Relying on the declarations of countries that have perpetuated this 77-year ethnic cleansing demonstrates a lack of empathy and ability to think for oneself. Zionists have no claim to this land. No country has a "right to exist." People have a right to exist, and the Zionist entity has proven its motivations are directly at odds with that.
yet NONE of muslim countries helped Palestine i any way. Muslim countries block borders, do not let Palestinians in and don't send any help in any form. Yet people are complaining, the people who are either citizens of these countries or have a strong ties. What YOU have done to prevent this? Nothing right? Then stop complainig or take action into your own hand. Islamic solidarity is a myth simple as that. Same people hate each other and yet expect someting to be done...
Medi-terra = Middle Earth (then just add the -nean!)
This is also why the dogs TERRiers were named, as they dig a lot!
Well, now the Jews are back and have re-adopted the earlier name of the place before Roman colonization (and, of course, LONG before the Muslim Conquest of the 7th century).
This isn't Reddit.
Finally, there is nothing "progressive" about Pablo's comment above. Israel is by far the most progressive country in the Middle East. There's nothing progressive about wishing for it to be overrun by violent tribalists who are very much less progressive than the Israelis. It's just good ol' regular anti-semitism by a different name and of a slightly different flavor, filtered and distilled through various intermediaries starting with Husayni, al-Banna, Nasser and Arafat, working its way through Habash, Guevara, the UN and Newton, delivered to your doorstep by Chomsky, Foucault, Sarsour, et al.
Also: We don't read!!
The second statement here seems fairly redundant.
YSFI
there were many disunified indigenous tribes there until the Romans moved in, and then, you know, David Cameron put Brexit to a vote and so the UK withdrew from the Roman Empire.
Except in your case add an additional 500 years to the unexplained gap. :)
But this does put a nice spotlight on the huge and baffling blank spot most Westerners have in their heads when it comes to the history of this extremely important region...
I LITERALLY COPIED AND PASTED THIS FOR ANOTHER GUY WHO DOESNT UNDERSTNAD THIS IS MY SECOND TIME SAYING IT WHAT THE HECK, IT WAS ALSO ON THIS QUIZ
Both Israel and Palestine are countries...
"The capital of Israel according to Israel", that's just childish.
We're gonna do that for all the countries now? The capital of France according to France is Paris. The capital of Costa Rica according to Costa Rica is San Jose.