Don't impressionists paint with small dots of color as well? I learned that pointilism and impressionism were the same thing. Except that pointilism was what the French called it.
No, no, in French, we say "impressionnisme" for the artistic movement of Monet, Pissarro and Renoir. Pointillism is a variant consisting in using small dots rather than dashes, to create color effects (similarly to color printing). It was theorized by Seurat, Signac is another example.
same finalist and quarter finalist, several times... (even with weird spelling I was pretty sure wasnt correct, but I didnt get why the right spelling wasnt accepted...)
I don't think the capitalist answer is correct. A capitalist is a wealthy person who invests money for profit. Actually one of the major preoccupations of capitalists is to create monopolies and trade cartels, thereby reducing competition and increasing profit.
Thank you for correcting that, tschutzer. I can't believe how many people don't know what capitalism really is. They hate capitalism, but the truth is that most societies have never seen it--or at least, they don't currently see it.
Could you enlighten us as to what capitalism "really is"? A lot of people also hate socialism, but it seems to me that most societies have never seen what it "really is."
I agree with tschutzer that monopoly creation is a side-effect, rather than a part of the definition. But I wouldn't agree that Ozchris's comment is "politically motivated". People of all political hues can see for themselves that trying to create monopolies is a common behavior of capitalists, especially those who are solely motivated by profit, regardless of the harm that motivation can cause.
The Webster Definition of capitalism is, "an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market."
Your definition is the left-wing view of capitalism. It is used by democrat lawmakers to villainize wealthy private owners of successful companies.
ctleng: your definition of capitalism is the "Webster Definition", as you say. In my Chambers, the definition of "capitalist" is simply "one who derives income and power from capital". Therefore I agree with Ozchris that a capitalist is not necessarily one who believes in free markets, and I also don't see that what he said is necessarily Left-wing. It seems to me that it may be ctleng who has a biased view.
Seriously though, the issue here is merely semantics. A capitalist is either a person who invests capital into a economic system, OR a person who believes in the socioeconomic system of free market capitalism (not mutually exclusive, of course). It’s like how you could say a communist who lives on a commune doesn’t necessarily have to believe in communism. Yeah, it’s an archaic use, but it’s the best analogy I could think of…
FadKrashmor, it's interesting how you added the word "power" into your definition. That is obviously how you see capitalism.
I agree that some capitalists are motivated by power, but that isn't the definition of a capitalist. The real issue here is the notion that we can each have our own definition of a word based on our own beliefs. When that happens, words lose their meaning and value in communication altogether. How can any of us understand words spoken if we keep changing the meaning to suit our own beliefs?
Capitalism is an economy in which the means of production are privately owned, in contrast to socialism, where they are owned by the state. A free market economy is one were the state does not interfere with the market. Obviously, capitalism is a necessary condition for a free market (the former is needed for the latter), but that does not mean that it is a sufficient condition (the former always leads to the latter).
A capitalist is someone who promotes capitalism (and may or may not also promote free markets) or someone who engages in capitalism, i.e. owns some means of production and uses them to generate profit. A capitalist does not necessarily believe in free markets.
Fascists like Hitler and Mussolini, and many other non-socialist dictators, were capitalists, but did not promote free markets. They allowed the means of production to stay in private hands, but of course those of their cronies. The nazis were no socialists (despite the name) but certainly also no free marketeers.
It's a bad definition. I've never met anyone serious who "believes" in free markets, not in any sense of the term. Everybody knows that free markets don't exist and have never existed, and that they wouldn't work. The disagreement between capitalists and socialists is on the degree of regulation, and who it should benefit.
I agree, your comment is measured compared to some of the others regarding the capitalist clue. I also don't understand what 'belief' has to do with it and the overemphasis on personal beliefs seems to be a by-product of the Protestantism that shaped American 'free-market' capitalism. In a sense, all Americans are capitalists regardless of whether or not we believe in the system.
I would think that chauvinist would be an acceptable answer for someone who hates women. Even though it can be hate to other groups, 96% of the time (that's the exact percentage trust me) it's used it's in a gender related cannotation.
A male chauvinist is one who views women as inferior. If they use the term chauvinist by itself they are using a shortcut. Chauvinism, could, for example, apply to Europeans who believe they are more cultured, civilized, sophisticated, educated, intelligent, etc. than others.
Indeed, once more from my dictionary: chauvinism; "...an absurdly extravagant pride in one's country, with corresponding contempt for foreign nations..". Now where have you seen that kind of thing?
Wow, I think that's the first time I have ever seen chauvinism used to exclusively describe political beliefs. What dictionary are you using? Kalbahamut's answer is correct.
Hates women could also be a sexist...though not as specific as misogynist, based on the wording of the question it is not technically incorrect. I am not sure how you could alter the question to avoid that, so I would suggest adding sexist as an acceptable answer.
It is possible to be sexist without being misogynistic. Sexism just means some form of prejudice or discrimination relating to sex or gender. Accepting it would be like accepting "artist" for pointillist.
I think it should be "styles hair" for stylist. I don't think a hair stylist necessarily cuts hair as much as they, well, style it. As in doing plaits/braids or curls or waves, perhaps temporary colour or intricate hair art. I think if it's someone who cuts hair it's a hairdresser or barber. I think not all hair stylists are qualified to cut hair, but many hair dressers or barbers are can both cut the hair and then style it after. But stylist is not necessarily the same thing as a barber or hairdresser. Also "stylist" is very general in itself, it doesn't have to be hair. A stylist could also be someone who picks out fashionable clothes/fashionable looks in general. So "hair stylist" would be more specific
Agreed with above, capitalist is not necessarily a good match for a person who believes in a free market. A capitalist is just somebody who invests capital.
The Webster definition I included which mentions the words "free market" are not in the context of a capitalist, but rather capitalism. What I said above is exactly the same thing you just said here in your comment.
[hat tip to Brian O'Nolan, aka Flann O'Brien aka Myles na gCopaleen, an Irish novelist and humorist of the last century]
Your definition is the left-wing view of capitalism. It is used by democrat lawmakers to villainize wealthy private owners of successful companies.
I agree that some capitalists are motivated by power, but that isn't the definition of a capitalist. The real issue here is the notion that we can each have our own definition of a word based on our own beliefs. When that happens, words lose their meaning and value in communication altogether. How can any of us understand words spoken if we keep changing the meaning to suit our own beliefs?
A capitalist is someone who promotes capitalism (and may or may not also promote free markets) or someone who engages in capitalism, i.e. owns some means of production and uses them to generate profit. A capitalist does not necessarily believe in free markets.
Fascists like Hitler and Mussolini, and many other non-socialist dictators, were capitalists, but did not promote free markets. They allowed the means of production to stay in private hands, but of course those of their cronies. The nazis were no socialists (despite the name) but certainly also no free marketeers.
Certainly the title on enough bar manuals.