There are neo-Roman polytheism believers around so it's not inconceivable that they'd have a temple somewhere. But certainly not continuously since 600 BC.
It is probably a case of people thinking the statement is so outrageous, it must be true. Personally, I haven't really looked at the statement properly. I just read Jupiter and temple, and thought, sure, why not? Just like there will surely be statues of Jupiter displayed around Rome somewhere.
Are you conflating "Italian" with "Italic"? This is just history 101. Furthermore, this quiz is about Italy, the country, so I think that was context enough. Was Julius Caesar Italian?
This quiz is not about the geographical area, the peninsula et cetera. It is clearly about the country, and is part of the country series of True or False quizzes. So your "it depends how you define Italian" calls your bluff. And it's still an anachronism when used for popes.
I can't believe there was a guy named Guccio Gucci. And his entire name was "Guccio Giovanbattista Giacinto Dario Maria Gucci." That's so stereotypically Italian-sounding that it feels like it should be fake.
Immediately when I read that question, I doubted that could possibly be a real name. Then I remembered Galileo Galilei and wondered if it could be possible. In the end, I second-guessed myself, got it wrong, and felt like an idiot.
This is the first one I ever got every question right, first try! True or false so not great, but still happy! Who would have thought. I guessed on a few. Also, Guccio Gucci?! Too wild
Italy still has fewer people than it did during the peak of the Roman Empire
I feel like this question should be worded "Present day Italy has fewer people than the Roman Empire did at its peak". The "than it did" in the original questions made me wonder if it was referring to the number of people living within what would be present day Italy or the total number of people across the entirety of Rome's empire.
A search cites ~60-70 million as the estimated high end of the Roman Empire's population, and Italy's present day population at ~60 million. Best guess, that would make the answer "true". I strongly suspect it'd be "false" if limited to Italy's present day borders.
Wow, just wow.
The Pantheon is such a temple but perhaps only from about 300 BC?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/italic
I feel like this question should be worded "Present day Italy has fewer people than the Roman Empire did at its peak". The "than it did" in the original questions made me wonder if it was referring to the number of people living within what would be present day Italy or the total number of people across the entirety of Rome's empire.
A search cites ~60-70 million as the estimated high end of the Roman Empire's population, and Italy's present day population at ~60 million. Best guess, that would make the answer "true". I strongly suspect it'd be "false" if limited to Italy's present day borders.