If we used that logic, we'd probably go back to proto Indo-European for every answer. The language given is meant to be the language in which it became a name. So, for example, the name William was formed by combining two words in Old High German. But those words, like all words, derive from earlier languages. The answer is Old High German.
Only reason I didn't guess Aramaic was that I didn't really know what it was called in English. Or the Irish because it didn't show up with "Gaelic", so I figured I'd already guessed that language.
That was the only one I had missing. I had already guessed Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, and some other variations. Doesn't take too long to run down a list of all possibilities and I was getting frustrated so opened up the comments and found the answer.
It would be interesting to see a more modern version of this quiz (most popular names from last 10 years, perhaps). I imagine there'd be at least 1 Arabic and a lot more Spanish.
Weird quiz. Germanic is one category (lumped in with Old High German and Proto-Germanic, which have quite a few centuries separating them), whilst (Old) English, which is a Germanic language, has its own category. The historical linguist in me finds this all rather a mess.
Weird divisions are made. Not placing english with the germanic languages for instance, or old norse for that matter. And not having scottish gaeilic showing up for celtic ( or gaeilic I believe, but that was just before the time ran out so I could ve been too late).
If you are gonna use divisions and subdivions all at the same time (different levels of the "familylanguage-tree"). You should atleast make it clear in the the description. Because if you have guessed one language family, naturally you think you are done with that one and do not need to name the languages that are contained in that specific group individually.
It is like using different rules all at once. (Like in an animal quiz, for some answers accepting mammal, or fish, while for others requiring the exact subspecies) From your previous comment I get you choose where a name first showed up. But it makes for a very inconsistent quiz. And I think most people will run into this problem.
Love the idea though. Am curious what the names are. (But I guess they are left out to avoid endless discussion about the origins? There a so many variations of names that it can get messy)
Stupid me.
Quizmaster took the 50 most popular mens PLUS the 50 most popular womens names.
If you are gonna use divisions and subdivions all at the same time (different levels of the "familylanguage-tree"). You should atleast make it clear in the the description. Because if you have guessed one language family, naturally you think you are done with that one and do not need to name the languages that are contained in that specific group individually.
It is like using different rules all at once. (Like in an animal quiz, for some answers accepting mammal, or fish, while for others requiring the exact subspecies) From your previous comment I get you choose where a name first showed up. But it makes for a very inconsistent quiz. And I think most people will run into this problem.
0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34, etc.