Mesopotamia was never really a Roman province. First the Parthians then the Sassanid Persians were powerful rivals of the Romans that held that territory quite firmly. Trajan and Septimius Severus managed to conquer it but each time only briefly. Thus, I don't think it's a good idea to consider Baghdad and Kuwait City here.
While I accept your decision, I have to kindly disagree. Sure, it wasn't part of the empire for long, but it was part of the empire.
Anyhow, nice quiz. Are those metropolitan numbers? I thought about typing Tel Aviv, Brussels and Frankfurt but though they surely are smaller than 2.5 million
I knew I was missing a city in Turkey (duh, the capital), and I could not for the LIFE of me remember the capital of Jordan. I didn't realize the Romans had founded Cologne, though. Those pesky border towns.
Yes, a lot of "oldest cities" titles have to do with semantics and definitions being used. The list I was referencing excludes Colchester because, even though it was settled shortly before Roman Londinium and Bath, it is thought to have been abandoned at some point between the 6th and 11th centuries. London and Aquae Sulis (Bath), on the other hand, have probably* been continuously inhabited since the Romans established a city center in each in 43 AD.
* there is some debate as to whether London was entirely or only mostly abandoned after the withdrawal of the Romans in the 5th century.
I'm pretty sure the actual founding date and founder(s) of London are unknown, its first mention being in the Magna Carta, where it was given all the powers it had had since...the past. Ambiguous. But first people to start continuous occupation does not mean founders.
We know exactly when the Roman city of Londinium was founded. It was 43 AD, same year as the Roman conquest of England. There is evidence of human settlements in the London area dating back to the Bronze Age, though.
I think it's generally accepted that the city of London was abandoned as a functioning urban centre some time after the Romans left. Saxon London was further West, along what's now The Strand because that's where they were able to pull their boats onto a beach of sorts - hence the name.
Amsterdam (even with urban area) doesn't get near the population of the lowest on this quiz (same for Rotterdam/The Hague). And the Romans didn't even get north of the Rhine, so they never got the area where Amsterdam is now
ya, only a little bit, it only became the capitol of the Empire when Constantine became emperor, and after the split of the empire, the Roman (western half) fell in around 500 CE, whereas the Constantinople (western half) became known as the Byzantine Empire (which was still the Roman Empire) until Constantinople fell almost 1000 YEARS LATER in 1453.
Maybe they were called away before finishing the quiz, or maybe they thought they'd already typed it. That happens to me a lot - I'll think of two answers, type one, then move on before typing the other but I think I typed it. Then sometimes we just don't see the obvious. If you ask a number of people, "Who is buried in Grant's tomb," a few will scratch their heads and say they can't remember or don't know.
Actually Budapest is not completely a correct answer, as the Danube was the border of the Roman empire, the Pannonia province contained only the Transdanubia part of the current territory of Hungary.
And unfortunately Pest, the main part of Budapest is on the other site of the river...
I was also under that impression. It might have something to do with different ways of measuring city sizes or it could be that millions of former residents of Aleppo are now dead or living in Turkey, Jordan, Greece, Germany and so on.
I know approximately where the top border goes on the european continent, but totally forgot about the uk and africa... I kept typing in the biggest cities I could think of below the line (limes) in europe.. (which obviously didnt make the cut because of the uk and africa cities..)
That accounts for nearly all of my 12 misses.. All but tel aviv, amman and izmir (but the last though I would never have gotten, couldnt even tell you where they were, had to look it up..)
I am having a problem with spelling, or what people may consider correct spelling. What are the approved spellings to be found? (iIn this case ismir and smyrna did not work for me). But this kind of thing happens all over the place. Beijing/Peking, Calcutta/Kolkata and so on. As a Dutch speaker, I am happy with Brugge rather than Bruges, Ieper rather than Ypres. Kortrijk rather than Courtrai. So who decides?
Probably a person speaking English, since the quizzes are in English, unless specifically stated otherwise. I live in Czechia, and most of city names are obviously different in Czech (for example: Rome=Řím, Paris=Paříž, Belgrade=Bělehrad, etc.). But I would have to be insane to complain that those are not accepted in English quizzes.
As a Dutch person, Rotterdam/the Hague should not be on this list. These two cities together have a population of 1.1 million. The given number of 3.28 million is almost the entire province. If you keep it you should do it in the same way as the Ruhr.
Even with urban area population, Rotterdam and The Hague combined wouldn't even get near that number, I think the whole province doesn't even have 3,28 million inhabitants
Anyhow, nice quiz. Are those metropolitan numbers? I thought about typing Tel Aviv, Brussels and Frankfurt but though they surely are smaller than 2.5 million
* there is some debate as to whether London was entirely or only mostly abandoned after the withdrawal of the Romans in the 5th century.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Limes1.png
And unfortunately Pest, the main part of Budapest is on the other site of the river...
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0006%3Aentry%3Daquincum
That accounts for nearly all of my 12 misses.. All but tel aviv, amman and izmir (but the last though I would never have gotten, couldnt even tell you where they were, had to look it up..)