yeah I guess there's that little bit that sticks out to the east that many people drive through when traveling between Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Ohio. But at most they might stop to visit a gas station or convenience store.
They are missing some great hiking and white water rafting. Getting to the Carolinas or VA from OH, MI, IN, Western PA or NY etc nearly requires travel through WV.
Delaware is in a similar situation. I wonder how many people included Delaware because of a trip on I-95 or a stop on Amtrak's Northeast Corridor rather than an actual visit to the state.
I don't know anyone besides vacationers from DC and Maryland and a couple of corporate lawyers who have actually visited Delaware.
I actually doubt that people visit for that reason. Most of those businesses registered there for tax reasons have no real office space; just a place for official mail to be delivered. I've dealt with dozens of Delaware incorporated businesses, and if I had to visit them, it was never to Delaware.
I'm originally from the NoVA area. The only local-ish beaches I've ever been to are Virginia Beach (probably 2-3x), Ocean City, Maryland (2-3x), Chincoteague (once), and Rehoboth Beach (once) which is in Delaware but the opposite end of the state. I can list multiple far-off states and at least seven different countries with beaches I've visited more often than the ones around here, which to me never really seemed worth going to.
You would be surprised how many people travel the Appalachian Trail. Even though only 4 miles goes through West Virginia, it does go through the state, plus 20 miles of the trail is along the West Virginia Virginia border.
I'm not very well traveled and I've been to 3 of these states. Granted one is a neighboring state and another is a neighbor of that one. I'm really surprised at how low Alaska is on this list.
Except Acadia... a place that a LOT of northeastern JetPunkers visit... while tell me how many JetPunkers live near Kansas? And what to even do there...
So less than 10% of "state map filler outers" have been to South Dakota? Bummer. Really owe it to yourselves to spend a bit of time at Mount Rushmore and the Black Hills. Seriously beautiful country, the Badlands are amazing, and some really cool caving as well.
It is extremely difficult for most of us to get to Mt. Rushmore. I believe the closest truly decent-sized airport is Minneapolis, which is an 8-hour drive away.
Me too. We go there almost every year. There is a lot of fun touristy stuff to do around the area and it's not very expensive. But we also only live about 4 hours away so that helps.
I went to South Dakota while on a road trip to Yellowstone. We got to see Mt. Rushmore and the Badlands. It was definitely worth then time spent there.
You need to be ok with spending several days to drive there and back. And then when you do get there, it isn't as spectacular as some would have you believe it is. The best part is the scenery surrounding the landmark.
Quite interesting to see alaska there, I would expect more tourism there since it has so much natural beauty. Also, I lived in Montana for 5 years, reccommended if you like national parks, beautiful state as well
I'm really skeptical about a couple of these. Maine, Rhode island and Delaware are tiny and/or really out of the way. I've always heard people say I saw all the New England states in a single day. Maybe it's a matter of perception. To me visited means that you walked outside for a couple of hours, but some may think as long as my car or train went through it or my plane landed there it counts while others might say visited only happens after spending a couple of days. One thing that might skew numbers is foreign travelers. You can fly into New York get a car and hit about 15 states in a week. For someone that might never come back to the country that sounds a lot more appealing than flying into Houston driving the same distance and not hitting another state.
Those state are also close to the most densely-populated area of the country, and they're small, which helps. Lots of people from Boston dip into the other New England states because they're easy to hit. Providence is a 45-minute train ride from Boston. When I lived in Boston, sometimes we'd take the train to Providence just to do something new. Ditto New Hampshire. You've got the skiing in Vermont. Leafpeeping in Maine. People from New York and New Jersey come up with ease too. That area is so tiny that you can drive from anywhere. Compare that to the states on this list, all of which are sparsely populated, enormous (i.e., it's unlikely you'll just pop into and out of one), and whose biggest cities are not really driving distance from any population centers. It's a much bigger commitment to get to them, so fewer people make the effort.
Leafpeeping is when people go to see the fall foliage when the leaves turn all sorts of colors. Maine has a high trees density so people go up to see the colors.
Seems pretty accurate. I've been to all but 10 states, and 7 of those are in this list.
@idontkn1: Maine, Rhode Island, and Delaware are all close to major metropolitan areas, so get a lot of visitors. Maine is the most out of the way, but it still isn't too far from Boston and has Acadia National Park, which is the 7th most visited national park in the country. Rhode Island is an hour or so from Boston, and you have to pass through Delaware to get from Baltimore/DC to Philadelphia/NYC, so almost anyone who lives in any of those cities passes through Delaware pretty regularly.
Genuine question, not trying to be rude. But for those of you who live in these states, why? These all fit the bill of states that if you can leave, you do. But surely that isn't everyone?
I'm from Pennsylvania, and other than the two major cities everybody I know just wants to leave. And PA certainly has more to do than North Dakota or Mississippi. Looking for some insight.
Some people prefer the attractions outside cities. Alaska, Idaho, and North Dakota in particular have strong economies, beautiful natural landscapes, and abundant recreation opportunities.
There are plenty of dive bars to get black out drunk at 8am in any town in north dakota if the population is over 10,000 (there are a few of them and I made a quiz about it), so there is that to do. You're not rude though, I left because, yes, I could and did. Many are flocking there because of jobs though which encouraged me to leave even more. There is much good there to be fair, but I like the travel lifestyle.
North Dakota represent! You suckers are missing out... on nothing. There is nothing worth seeing in my home state, look away, pass by, nothing to see there... The money spent on add campaigns for tourism is funny though. I've been traveling for work and seen advertisements about "legendary" or what have you and it cracks me up. Oof da.
when i typed in Rhode Island and saw no confirmation i nearly lost my mind when i typed in Delaware and the same thing "non" happened i questioned the reliability of Jet Punk and my entire understanding of Gods creation , i am now convinced this is part of a worldwide conspiracy led by Interpol ,against me , i am now going into deep incognito mode , please pray for me
Maine is pretty easily reachable from Boston and other population centers in the NE. On a work trip to Boston once, I spent my evening driving up to Kennebunk in Maine for dinner, then drove home. No problem.
Jokes aside, it's too bad that states like Montana and Alaska are on here. Neither of them get a lot of publicity, but I've heard both places are beautiful and they've both been on my bucket list. I'm guessing remoteness is probably a factor working against them though.
Only two states I haven't been to are the top two on this list. The only circumstance I can envision for visiting the top one would be to go to the national park there - I'm into the national parks and have visited over 40 of them. The second on the list is on my bucket list for a lot of reasons so someday soon . . .
As far as doing a country one is concerned, as some folks have suggested, I would guess that very few folks here except for the intrepid travelers like kalba have been to more than a few dozen of them, so there would be 170-180 countries that tie for the top position in terms of fewest visits. W/r to the converse, I believe there is a "Most Visited Countries by Jetpunkers" quiz already.
To some of the comments... the quiz does not say that people are going there as tourists or to specifically visit the state - it's based on how people filled out the map on their profile.
I, for instance, have driven coast-to-coast, and some of the states I've listed that I have "been to" were only as long as it took to drive through to my actual destination.
For instance, Oklahoma... I've been to Oklahoma maybe a total of 2 hours, driving the 1 hour diagonal through the panhandle on 2 different road trips.
I've been to all 50 states - have any other quizzers done that? Dan, since you can access the states-visited info for everyone, are you able to do a graph of the % of quizzers who have visited each number of states? Finally, do the percentages in this quiz include those who haven't visited any states at all?
1) Yes, it is virtually certain that other users have been to all 50 states, although 50 is very impressive for a non-American. I've been to 46 personally.
2) The % who've been to 50 will certainly be inflated by people who enter all 50 states as a gag.
3) Yes, the percentages in this quiz include those who haven't visited any states at all.
Maybe the reverse - maybe residents of blue states have little tolerance for visiting red states. Or maybe who cares since maybe a lot of us visit quiz sites to get away from the same old, same old tired red state/blue state political crap.
It's actually fairly non-partisan I think, an example of correlation not causation. Sparsely populated, rural states like the ones on this list tend to be Republican. Accessing many of these places can be inconvenient, as they don't have major cities with direct flights. This is compounded by the fact that these states aren't very close to other very populous states, which makes it also makes it difficult to drive to them. You can contrast this with West Virginia and Kentucky, which are also rural but are also close to larger population centers like Pennsylvania and Illinois, making them somewhat more frequent stopping points on car trips.
TL;DR: I think it relates to demographics and geography, not policy. (Also, for the record, I think there's plenty to still see/do in many of these states, it's just a matter of inconvenience.)
When a correlation exists you need to figure out whether:
1) A causes B
2) B causes A
3) C causes both A in B
In this case, the answer is clearly C. Rural areas tend to vote Republican and are also less likely to have major tourist attractions and large airports.
This surprised me a bit as well. I guessed Hawaii pretty early in this quiz just due to the sheer distance and cost involved in getting there, plus no one is driving through Hawaii to get to another state. In hindsight, it checks out that geography nerds like to travel!
My guess would be Yellowstone and Grand Teton are very big draws from a parks perspective, along with Jackson Hole being a well known outdoors paradise.
I've been to Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Mississippi. Drove through them for the most part, but Arkansas was pretty nice toward the west. Mississippi sucks, and Oklahoma I just drove through I-40 the whole way, but Oklahoma City looked pretty nice.
I just guessed states which (a) aren't very populated and are surrounded by not very populated states and (b) those I haven't really heard of anyone going to out of choice (ones which don't have very famous landmarks or cities)
I don't know anyone besides vacationers from DC and Maryland and a couple of corporate lawyers who have actually visited Delaware.
@idontkn1: Maine, Rhode Island, and Delaware are all close to major metropolitan areas, so get a lot of visitors. Maine is the most out of the way, but it still isn't too far from Boston and has Acadia National Park, which is the 7th most visited national park in the country. Rhode Island is an hour or so from Boston, and you have to pass through Delaware to get from Baltimore/DC to Philadelphia/NYC, so almost anyone who lives in any of those cities passes through Delaware pretty regularly.
I'm from Pennsylvania, and other than the two major cities everybody I know just wants to leave. And PA certainly has more to do than North Dakota or Mississippi. Looking for some insight.
Jokes aside, it's too bad that states like Montana and Alaska are on here. Neither of them get a lot of publicity, but I've heard both places are beautiful and they've both been on my bucket list. I'm guessing remoteness is probably a factor working against them though.
I, for instance, have driven coast-to-coast, and some of the states I've listed that I have "been to" were only as long as it took to drive through to my actual destination.
For instance, Oklahoma... I've been to Oklahoma maybe a total of 2 hours, driving the 1 hour diagonal through the panhandle on 2 different road trips.
1) Yes, it is virtually certain that other users have been to all 50 states, although 50 is very impressive for a non-American. I've been to 46 personally.
2) The % who've been to 50 will certainly be inflated by people who enter all 50 states as a gag.
3) Yes, the percentages in this quiz include those who haven't visited any states at all.
TL;DR: I think it relates to demographics and geography, not policy. (Also, for the record, I think there's plenty to still see/do in many of these states, it's just a matter of inconvenience.)
1) A causes B
2) B causes A
3) C causes both A in B
In this case, the answer is clearly C. Rural areas tend to vote Republican and are also less likely to have major tourist attractions and large airports.
No..
*Rolleyes*
it's just naming all the states until you get it right
i was frustrated