Thank you for this quiz. Might I suggest you include Golgotha and Gagulta as acceptable answers to the question regarding the hill upon which Jesus was crucified?
Golgotha gets a lot more Google hits than Golgatha. If you accept the latter, maybe you should accept the former. (Plus, that's the way it's spelled in the KJV.)
Struggled with Golgotah as well, which is what I've always heard it called in my language, until I remembered seing "calvary" used in another quiz a few days ago. Wasn't able to figure out "aramaic" though, even after trying every variation of what "arraméen" might be like in English that I could think of..
Again confusion between the definition of apostle and disciple. Disciples are followers, which the 12 were during Jesus' time of ministry. They became apostles when Jesus died and they went from being followers to leaders spreading the message. Judas was never an apostle, he was dead before anyone became an apostle.
Could you change the wording of the final meal a bit? I realise I was being dim but I thought it was asking for what they ate so was trying bread and wine and figured that must have been the menu for some other meal when it wasn't accepted
QM Throwing Shade..."more obvious." Like dude...it was obvious already...sigh...here's DaVinci to make it MORE obvious. I'm sure not the intent, but still funny.
Any chance you could remove "pilat" as an answer option? I cannot find Pilate's name spelt that way in any language, and it'll save people like me looking up at my next answer seeing it appear as "ethorns" and not be accepted ("ethorns" unfortunately isn't a type-in for "thorns")
More accurate title would be myth-of-jesus, since this is based on the New Testament and not the historical Jesus, assuming that there even was one of the latter. Easy five points regardless.
Correct if I am wrong but is there not historical proof that Jesus existed? Not that he was God but that he was a person. Outside of the Lazarus question and perhaps the Sermon of the Mount there is not much on here in way of religious beliefs. Not a big deal, I just do not see the problem with calling this Life of Jesus.
okay I will correct you because you are wrong. There is actually *zero* proof that Jesus was a real person. I'm not saying that he was not. My personal opinion is that he probably was. But that doesn't change the fact that there definitely is no proof. And they've looked. A lot. Archaeology as a discipline essentially was invented by Christians going to Palestine looking for artifacts to validate their faith.
While there are many scholars who have spent lifetimes studying/writing about the historicity of Jesus, they've had very little to work with. The "historical Jesus" that they've constructed is all speculative. The story of Jesus as written about in the Bible, a religious document, is internally inconsistent and in some cases it has not been corroborated by independent 3rd party sources; in other cases it has been proven false. We're all very familiar with this story, but since its historicity has not been established it's more accurate to call the story a myth.
Okay I apologize, I was under the impression that non biblical roman sources that showed his existence. I don't want to get into personal religious beliefs, but I want to let you know that I am not a right wing religious radical, that believes that the bible has to be taken as a historical source. I was just wrong in this instance, thanks for the information.
kalbahamut:...in other cases it has been proven false.
What are these other cases where the Bible has been proven to be false? I've yet to find a single instance where this has actually been so. And no, the Bible does not say that the creative days of Genesis were only 24 hours in length apiece. Creationists wrongly conclude that, not the Bible.
Don: there are hundreds of examples, and yes the account of the creation of the Universe in Genesis is obviously false but I wasn't even thinking about that I was thinking of the story of Jesus found in the NT. One example of a historically inaccurate detail of that story is the description of the census being taken that prompted Joseph and Mary to travel to Bethlehem. No such census ever took place, not as described. For something a little more fanciful, what about Matthew 27:52 talking about "many" zombies coming to life and roaming about Jerusalem where they were seen by many people. And yet there is not a single extra-Biblical account of this event. You would think that something like that would make an impression! Matthew and Luke both talk about a darkness covering the entire Earth at the time of the crucifixion... in addition to being impossible this was also not recorded anywhere by anyone. Not in Israel. Not in Rome. Not in China. I could go on.
packersfan: the most commonly cited early Roman sources that mention Jesus are writings by Pliny, Tacitus, Suetonius, and Josephus. The youngest of these men was born in 37 AD, the oldest in 69 AD. Jesus is said to have been executed around 33 AD. So none of these men could have been contemporaries of Jesus. If they wrote about him at all, it was decades after his alleged crucifixion.
In the case of Josephus, the earliest and probably most cited reference, often given as the "best proof" of a historical Jesus, it has been pretty well established by now that the passage being referenced is a forgery added to Josephus' work after the fact.
The other three references come later. All are brief. There is some dispute over whether or not the Pliny reference is really referring to Jesus or not. They mention the persecution of Christians in passing.
All three of the more credible references mention Jesus or Christ only as he relates to Christians in the Empire. These passages provide evidence that there were Christians. They do not provide evidence that there was a Christ.
It would be very much the equivalent of me writing down "I traveled to Mecca where I met many Muslims. These Muslims read from the holy book Qu'ran which was dictated by the prophet Muhammad, whom they venerate." - I could write that. It's true. But it's not evidence for there being a historical Muhammad in the 7th century. It's only evidence for there being Muslims today.
The existence of Christians in the Roman Empire by the 1st century is pretty well established. By the 2nd century it's extensively documented. But outside of the Bible the existence of Jesus is not recorded in any surviving text from the time he was alive.
@Don, not only is the length of time in Genesis wrong, but the order is wrong too. It says that plants were created before the sun! How they managed to photosynthesise is never mentioned... This example is only one of countless places where the Bible gets it wrong. Noah's ark never happened. Exodus almost certainly never happened (although it is logically possible for some of the things it says to be true). @kalbahamut's example is correct too. Two of the Gospels contradict each other here. One says there was a census where they had to go to Bethlehem from Nazareth (a census did happen around that time, but after Herod died which makes the subsequent persecution by Herod impossible. And they wouldn't have had to go to Bethlehem). Another says that Mary and Joseph lived in Bethlehem and only moved to Nazareth after Jesus was born. They can't both be true.
God actually created light before he created the sun, so that's the answer to your comment about the order of the days of creation. Yes, I know that you probably won't accept that answer, and now think that I am a crazy person. By the world's standards, I am. As for what you said about Noah's ark and the Exodus, please substantiate your claims. Also, the gospels do not contradict each other - there were actually several different Herods during Bible times. And no, the Bible never says that Mary and Joseph lived in Bethlehem before Jesus was born. It only says that Bethlehem was Joseph's home town.
encom it's encouraging to know that you at least recognize how you look to an objective person. I know you probably think "the world's" standards are somehow guided by Satan or something, but, still, at least you are aware at some level.
This goes for everyone here (though I wanted to comment here specifically for my own reasons) please respect what other people believe. That goes for the Christians, Atheists, and whomever else may be here. Though mostly this has been between Christians and Atheists. Just no passive aggressive typing as it is mostly annoying to read on both sides. I won't say what side I personally have chosen, but I do enjoy reading what both sides have to say without you all just silently jabbing at each other. Thank you for reading and have a great rest of your day.
Respecting people doesn't mean you have to respect everything they believe. And I'm sure, even people who repeat this tired meme, know that at some level, and can easily think of beliefs that others could hold that they would not respect and would have no problem coming out and saying were wrong or even abominable. Pretending that you don't feel this way when you do is much more disrespectful than being honest with people.
right. and that's fine. All I said was that the title of the quiz could be more accurate. The content of the quiz is fine as is, given the instructions.
Please accept "Pascha" as an alternative answer for "Easter." Eastern Orthodox Christians most commonly refer to the day of Christ's resurrection as Pascha.
I believe there are parts of the Bible where Jesus speaks in Hebrew, so I struggled with the language clue... Guessed Hebrew, Latin, Arabic and even English.
I enjoyed this quiz. Thank you. I love all the Bible quizzes on here.
I thought of a relevant Bible verse for a quiz about the life of Jesus and indeed about our trying to remember things about Him: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever." (Hebrews 13:8)
Ha ha! Kalbahamut is triggered! It's now official! Our strategy of just insulting him for not being a Christian has worked! Why bother having a calm, rational discussion over the existence of God and/or Jesus and think to ourselves that maybe not everything we've been told is true, when we can just hurl insults at people who've made us angry and try to make them get angry? That's the way to win! Works every time!
You're letting him live rent-free in your head. Plus, he's correct. All religions are human creations. That being said, if it makes you feel a little less insecure about the big, scary universe, have at it.
Please could you tell me though, what defines a 'holiday' in the US? Palm Sunday is described as a holiday in this particular quiz and Guy Fawkes night was, in another quiz. In the UK we would probably refer to these as celebrations or festivals, as a holiday for us usually means much of the population gets a day off work.
huh? I've never been a fan of Norm, so I don't know if the context would help this joke make any more sense than it does here, but out of context... wha?? Atheists believe in no gods. When they respond to theists, then the conversation becomes about specific gods. Maybe he should have said the problem with theists is that when they talk to anyone with beliefs different from their own they always have to make everything about themselves and their own specific beliefs? ...that would make sense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_Iscariot#Role_as_an_apostle
While there are many scholars who have spent lifetimes studying/writing about the historicity of Jesus, they've had very little to work with. The "historical Jesus" that they've constructed is all speculative. The story of Jesus as written about in the Bible, a religious document, is internally inconsistent and in some cases it has not been corroborated by independent 3rd party sources; in other cases it has been proven false. We're all very familiar with this story, but since its historicity has not been established it's more accurate to call the story a myth.
What are these other cases where the Bible has been proven to be false? I've yet to find a single instance where this has actually been so. And no, the Bible does not say that the creative days of Genesis were only 24 hours in length apiece. Creationists wrongly conclude that, not the Bible.
In the case of Josephus, the earliest and probably most cited reference, often given as the "best proof" of a historical Jesus, it has been pretty well established by now that the passage being referenced is a forgery added to Josephus' work after the fact.
The other three references come later. All are brief. There is some dispute over whether or not the Pliny reference is really referring to Jesus or not. They mention the persecution of Christians in passing.
It would be very much the equivalent of me writing down "I traveled to Mecca where I met many Muslims. These Muslims read from the holy book Qu'ran which was dictated by the prophet Muhammad, whom they venerate." - I could write that. It's true. But it's not evidence for there being a historical Muhammad in the 7th century. It's only evidence for there being Muslims today.
The existence of Christians in the Roman Empire by the 1st century is pretty well established. By the 2nd century it's extensively documented. But outside of the Bible the existence of Jesus is not recorded in any surviving text from the time he was alive.
I left a single comment. People responded to it. I responded back.
I thought of a relevant Bible verse for a quiz about the life of Jesus and indeed about our trying to remember things about Him: "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever." (Hebrews 13:8)
Wait a minute...
Please could you tell me though, what defines a 'holiday' in the US? Palm Sunday is described as a holiday in this particular quiz and Guy Fawkes night was, in another quiz. In the UK we would probably refer to these as celebrations or festivals, as a holiday for us usually means much of the population gets a day off work.
Cheers!
You scored 22/22 = 100%
22% of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is 17
Your high score is 22
Your fastest time is 1:29
First time, easy