Great quiz, just one correction: Asperger's is not a "less severe version of autism". It is a disability on the autism spectrum, meaning it is one of many forms of autism. And whether or not it is less severe than other forms of autism depends very much on which form we're comparing it to. Asperger's is extremely less severe than, say, very severe autism in which a person can't communicate effectively and is wheelchair bound, but it is less severe than a form of autism in which a person has complete control over their emotions and can communicate very effectively. If I were Quizmaster I'd change the phrasing a little. Maybe something like: "A common mild form of autism" or "A condition on the autism spectrum that affects emotional control".
Agree. Things have changed and Asperger's is now one of the Autism Spectrum Disorders. The disorder is on the high end of the spectrum and is usually less severe, but it can be classified as severe or mild. (One of our granddaughters is a high-functioning autistic whose symptoms are considered less severe, but she would not have been diagnosed with Asperger's.) I knew what you meant, but people should know about the changes.
I was going to say this. I third the request for change.
Talk to some people with autism and their families and friends, ask them how they'd like it described since they have to live with it.
As a friend of some people with autism I find them all individual and difficult to classify as mild or severe, one just learns their boundaries and limits, which are a little less generic than 'neurotypical' friends but just as liable to quirky and interesting. Actually I find it really useful having a diversity of friends for figuring myself out as to how I treat people.
I've thought it over, and the clue is staying. As you say, Asperger's is a part of the spectrum, and occupies the less severe end of the spectrum. I think people are trying to find a way to be offended by this, perhaps because people will self-diagnose or say that other people have Asperger's just because they are socially awkward.
I was medically diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome in when I was just four years old (just to clarify that I'm not self-diagnosing). I agree that the wording of the clue is incorrect - not "offensive", as you put it, but medically incorrect. Asperger's is an autism spectrum disorder and so to say it is a less severe version of ASD is wrong, regardless of how severe the condition is. I would compare it to saying "skin cancer is a less severe form of cancer", as skin cancer is less severe than some other cancers, but its still cancer.
Also I thought the term "Aspergers" was now disfavored because it came out that Dr. Asperger worked for the Nazis or something? Clinicians just refer to it as autism spectrum disorder?
Ask most autistic adults, myself included, and we will tell you that it's offensive as well as being incorrect. Aspergers is not used as a diagnosis anymore (DSM 5) - we're just autistic. You are not more or less autistic. It's like asking if whole wheat or sourdough is more bread.
. The spectrum that people like to cite is not a straight line.
And the reason that Asperger's, as well as the wording of this question, is offensive is that Dr Aperger was an ableist who thought some autistics were better than others, and he divided us by how useful we could be, and how difficult we were for our caregivers. There's historical evidence that he turned over that less useful half to Nazi eugenics programs. “Unfortunately, in the majority of cases the positive aspects of autism do not outweigh the negative ones.” That quote sums him up pretty well. He's not welcome in our community.
Agreed with the above. The clue was inaccurate before the DSM change, and it's even more inaccurate now. Asperger's is no longer a diagnosis. It is not part of the spectrum. It does not exist - and as noted is named after an awful human. I can understand not knowing this info when you made the quiz but your stubborn refusal to listen to everyone commenting is not a good look.
I don't think anyone in these replies is looking for a reason to be offended. Nothing in the wording of these comments suggests that to me. It is inaccurate, and arguably offensive (for me it was at least), as numerous commenters have already stated. And as someone who is autistic, I second the request of the commenters for you to modify this description of Asperger's.
Not only that, but I can say for myself that I know I wasn't looking for a reason to be offended. I was genuinely insulted and hurt by it.
Yeah it's not a great question. The DSM-5 and now also the ICD-11 removed Asperger's because there were not enough clinical differences between it and autism to warrant the distinction.
The other thing is that the autism spectrum is not a line with more or less severe on either end. Rather, it's a collection of traits that every autistic individual will experience at varying intensity. (Think a colour wheel rather than a ruler).
To describe severity of autism, describe the level of support required
For example: level 1 ASD with low support needs.
Another thing is that the autism community at large has been wanting to move away from using the term Aspergers, partly cause it's no longer a diagnostic term (just like manic depression and multiple personality disorder are no longer used), and because they don’t want a defining diagnosis to be named after a Nazi
For a site that recognizes the self determination of many groups, Im a bit surprised it won't do the same for autistic folks
that would have to be manic depressive then ( which it accepts) . Being just manic is something else. ( People with too much coffee can be like that...)
I agree with the other person about the wording of the Asperger's question needing to be changed. It's not a less severe version, that's just incorrect, it's on the spectrum. I'm sure it's one of the first things people would guess
agreed a disease is something that causes something. This is caused by something (ok ofcourse it cause stuff too, heartproblems sore knees, whatever, but I think you get what I mean. A disease is something genetic, or something you "catch" and in the second case there often is a cure for it ( or something to alleviate the symptoms atleast)
This isn't correct. A disease is constituted by its symptoms, not by the pathogen or other thing that causes it. I'm not sure if this is supposed to relate to the previous comment but obesity is both a disease and a medical condition.
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever: I always thought 'Lyme Disease' and 'Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever' were essentially the same thing. People from different places have different terms.
There are many tick diseases that are similar but not caused by the the same bacteria. Some may be more prevalent in certain regions than others. Lyme often has a characteristic circular or "bulls-eye" rash. The RMSF rash causes spots on the body, thus the name. I had a maculopapular rash on my wrists and ankles when I had erlichiosis. Treatments are not the same since each bacteria responds better to certain antibiotics than others.
Fun quiz. However, I think you should accept periodontal disease for inflammation of the gums. Also, I do not hear the word epilepsy anymore. I believe the preferred term is seizure disorder.
Gout can actually strike in a lot of places, not just the big toe (although that is the most common location). The high levels of uric acid cause it to crystallize around joints, tendons, or nearby tissues. The reason people get it in their big toe is because it's a form of arthritis and our toes take a lot of abuse. It can also show up in ankles, knees, the middle of the foot (where I've gotten it), or other locations.
So could you rephrase the description as something more like "Disease of kings, caused by high uric acid, causes painful swelling, often in the big toe?"
I don’t wanna be *that* person, but teeeechnically, the scoliosis one should say it’s an abnormal, lateral curvature of the spine. Kyphosis and lordosis are also labeled as abnormal because the spine does naturally have curves.
But I guess it’s not too big of a deal, since scoliosis is the first thing people think of when it comes to spine curves.
I was going to say much the same as you. Kyphosis is the one I think of first though because I have it :D And you can also have an abnormal lordotic curve too. But yeah, question should definitely specify abnormal curvature and either add the other answers or specify the direction.
While it might tip some people off as to what you're looking for, rabies doesn't actually cause you to be afraid of water. That's silly. They called it hydrophobia thinking that it did, because rabid dogs would not drink water, but I think that's just because their throats or mouths were so swollen that drinking became painful, same reason they start foaming at the mouth.
Borreliosis is a more generic, broader term for tick-borne diseases that includes but is not limited to Lyme disease. Based on the description in the quiz, I think it ought to stick to Lyme disease only.
Scoliosis is only the term for a spine with a sideways curve. You should also accept kyphosis, which is a spine with a curve to the front/back: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyphosis
That means lordosis must be accepted as well. I think that since scoliosis is the most commonly known term, that's what the quiz is referring to as the answer.
Asperger's is not a recognized condition anymore. Asperger was a NAZI party member who came up with the diagnosis to separate "productive" from "unproductive" autistic people and work out who should be killed. It's offensive and demeaning, please remove.
Just a small nitpick, but not all forms of Leukemia lead to an increase in WBCs; some can plummet the count through the ground too! The body works in some very strange ways.
Leukemia causes a decrease in white blood cells and a reduction in platelets. Does not cause an increase in white blood cells. AML is the most severe. Leukemia: One of the most serious illnesses that causes a decrease in white blood cell count is leukemia. https://health.onehowto.com/article/what-causes-a-decrease-in-white-blood-cells-212.html#:~:text=Leukemia%3A%20One%20of%20the%20most%20serious%20illnesses%20that,impacts%20the%20production%20of%20these%20blood%20cells.%20HIV%2FAIDS.
As someone with what was formerly called aspergers, I am not offended by the question. I think a question where the answer is autism would be better though, since aspergers has been superceded by ASD
hi, I understand it's a pretty recent change, but Aspergers isn't a condition anymore, the term is not used anymore and is instead just called autism.
And I don't expect you to check the history of every terms definition, but if you keep Aspergers you might want to change the description.
The term Asperger comes from Hans Asperger, a nazi who would decide wether or not autistic children got to live or if they would be murdered. The children who were deemed "useful" got diagnosed with Asperger, as it was a "milder version of autism"
I understand that this was not your intention but I would be very happy to see it changed
I tried rheumatism for the arthritis thing. Not sure if it is a very different thing or not a medical condition at all? With a lot of the other things I knew exactly what it is but couldn't remember the English name :D
Asperger's is not a DSM or ICD recognized condition anymore and was created by the Nazis to separate "productive" from "unproductive" Autistic folks in order to determine who should be killed. This question should really be removed.
Talk to some people with autism and their families and friends, ask them how they'd like it described since they have to live with it.
As a friend of some people with autism I find them all individual and difficult to classify as mild or severe, one just learns their boundaries and limits, which are a little less generic than 'neurotypical' friends but just as liable to quirky and interesting. Actually I find it really useful having a diversity of friends for figuring myself out as to how I treat people.
Ask most autistic adults, myself included, and we will tell you that it's offensive as well as being incorrect. Aspergers is not used as a diagnosis anymore (DSM 5) - we're just autistic. You are not more or less autistic. It's like asking if whole wheat or sourdough is more bread.
. The spectrum that people like to cite is not a straight line.
And the reason that Asperger's, as well as the wording of this question, is offensive is that Dr Aperger was an ableist who thought some autistics were better than others, and he divided us by how useful we could be, and how difficult we were for our caregivers. There's historical evidence that he turned over that less useful half to Nazi eugenics programs. “Unfortunately, in the majority of cases the positive aspects of autism do not outweigh the negative ones.” That quote sums him up pretty well. He's not welcome in our community.
Love the bread analogy from helenap13!
Not only that, but I can say for myself that I know I wasn't looking for a reason to be offended. I was genuinely insulted and hurt by it.
The other thing is that the autism spectrum is not a line with more or less severe on either end. Rather, it's a collection of traits that every autistic individual will experience at varying intensity. (Think a colour wheel rather than a ruler).
To describe severity of autism, describe the level of support required
For example: level 1 ASD with low support needs.
Another thing is that the autism community at large has been wanting to move away from using the term Aspergers, partly cause it's no longer a diagnostic term (just like manic depression and multiple personality disorder are no longer used), and because they don’t want a defining diagnosis to be named after a Nazi
For a site that recognizes the self determination of many groups, Im a bit surprised it won't do the same for autistic folks
So could you rephrase the description as something more like "Disease of kings, caused by high uric acid, causes painful swelling, often in the big toe?"
But I guess it’s not too big of a deal, since scoliosis is the first thing people think of when it comes to spine curves.
I tried that, plus morbidly obese plus morbid obesity and still didn't get the cheese
jaundice, rabies, lyme disease, and I rarely read or talk about diseases in english...
Plus I always fail to spell "smallpox", I always think it has to be "smallpocks"...
And I don't expect you to check the history of every terms definition, but if you keep Aspergers you might want to change the description.
The term Asperger comes from Hans Asperger, a nazi who would decide wether or not autistic children got to live or if they would be murdered. The children who were deemed "useful" got diagnosed with Asperger, as it was a "milder version of autism"
I understand that this was not your intention but I would be very happy to see it changed