The Anglo-Saxon period of English history is very rarely taught in English schools. We only get exposed to the end of it when we learn about the Battle of Hastings. It's a shame really, as the nation of England was founded during that period, and most other countries around the world learn about how their country came about (it's also a fascinating and interesting period in its own right).
Uh, no. Whilst Normandy was technically in France, it was not French. The Normans and the French hated each other. (I distinctly remember learning this in my Medieval History A Level class, as I was playing William at the time!)
Modern nations aren't really analogous to how medieval kingdoms existed. Normandy in William's day was part of France in the sense that the Duke of Normandy was a feudal vassal of the King of France, and the Normans spoke French and had adopted Catholicism, but medieval duchies were vastly more independent than modern sub-national regions tend to be. The phenomenon of centralised nations based (more or less) around a single ethnic group is very modern, and even then not as absolute as most people think of it.
Actually TinkyFitchFeeley does have a point about Normans not being French. For example if a person of a certain culture and language comes under rule by a foreign country of a different culture and language, whether by war or migration does that make them in this case French?
For the Normans they originally came from Vikings who migrated in the region, but by the 11th century they spoke a dialect of Old French called "Norman French", the Norman culture adopted the French culture and mannerisms.
This question is very relevent today and it depends on your point of view, personally im not sure but I think it is up to the person/group of people of that culture or language to decide for themselves.
Although according to Keegan's account of the battle, the English victory had more to do with (1) French hubris, (2) a muddy field, (3) the English foot soldiers who waded in to the melee and used clubs of all sorts to kill the French knights who were unable to maneuver. Nothing like the myth.
The effectiveness of the English longbows were certainly no myth (if that was what you were referring to). As they could penetrate chainmail with relative ease and could definitely take down a horse armed with mail. Also, these men using the longbows have been hunting with the bow and arrow their whole lives and were extremely strong to be able to draw at least 81 pounds consistently for the entirety of the battle. The english bowmen who thought in Agincourt were definitely trained in melee fighting and could of carry daggers, one handed swords, axes and/or clubs, although not all bowmen could afford a sword. One last thing is that the archers did kill knights with melee weapons, such as the ones i previously stated, and it was the archers who deployed wooden stakes to deter the advancing cavalry which impaled and detered the horses charging, all the archers had to do is find a chink in the armour and pierce it (armpits, crotch, throat and eye slits), dont forget the Mordhau technique.
That term anti-Semitism gets to me. Racism is racism everywhere. There isn't a special kind of racism just against Jewish people. If Jewish people suffer racism or perpetrate it, its just as bad as if it happens to anyone else. Why use a term that promotes exceptionalism?
Some folks consider "Jew" to be an ethnic category--for them, the word "racism" would be sufficient. Some people consider "Jew" to be a national category--for them, the term "anti-Zionist" would be sufficient, though for others this is highly controversial. Some people consider "Jew" to be a religious category. We don't have a general word for anti-religious bigotry, let alone one for bigotry specifically against the practitioners of Judaism, who have been persecuted longer and more consistently than any other faith.
For people who do not want to commit to one specific category for the fairly unusual label "Jew," anti-Semitism is a useful construct.
Most people who are opposed to Jewish "exceptionalism" are also opposed to Jews. Tell me, MDW, do the terms "racism," "colorism," "classism," "sexism," "homophobia," "trans-phobia," etc, get to you because you could get across the essential point with the word "bigotry," with only exceptionalist details being lost?
Please accept 'Azincourt' for the battle of Agincourt because it's the french name of this battle and also the actual french and english name of the city it took place in. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azincourt
Maybe it should be accepted given how international the user-base of Jetpunk is, but you should understand that's simply not the name of the battle in English. From the Wikipedia article, the first two sentences are "Azincourt is a commune in the Pas-de-Calais department in Northern France.The Battle of Agincourt took place nearby".
Considering that there aren't questions on the 400 years of the medieval period that occurred in England before 1066, I say it's justified. Also, I'd say the Battle of Hastings was probably the most important event in medieval English history.
I learnt that during the Battle of Agincourt, the French would chop off the first and middle fingers of captured English archers. In response, the remaining archers would defiantly stick up these fingers in the air at the French - an obscene gesture still used by Brits to this day
Why is Heart written as Coeur but Lion not as Leone for Richard's nickname? We are mixing French and English? Did they do that with his nickname at the time?
Well it is a quizz about Medieval English History and it has multiple questions about the Normans and French and only has 22 questions to cover the entirety of Medieval English History which is easier said then done, so I'm not entirely sure where your coming from.
For the Normans they originally came from Vikings who migrated in the region, but by the 11th century they spoke a dialect of Old French called "Norman French", the Norman culture adopted the French culture and mannerisms.
This question is very relevent today and it depends on your point of view, personally im not sure but I think it is up to the person/group of people of that culture or language to decide for themselves.
For people who do not want to commit to one specific category for the fairly unusual label "Jew," anti-Semitism is a useful construct.
Most people who are opposed to Jewish "exceptionalism" are also opposed to Jews. Tell me, MDW, do the terms "racism," "colorism," "classism," "sexism," "homophobia," "trans-phobia," etc, get to you because you could get across the essential point with the word "bigotry," with only exceptionalist details being lost?
(longbows did relatively little damage to plate armour)