Regarding the first question, while in the Americas it's generally accepted that Mexico is North (sometimes Central) America, almost each European country I have been to says it's actually South America.
I don't think the answer should be changed, I just find it curious.
Are you thinking of Latin America, rather than South America? Those terms have different meanings, but something might have been lost in translation perhaps.
I don't know who you've talked to but I'm European and I consider it to be in North America. Or Latin America, as blizzrd suggested, but that's not the question.
Geographical speaking, Mexico straddles between North and Central America, since the natural borders of Central America are the Isthmus of Tehuantepec (with North) and of Panama (with South).
Mexicans will tell you we're a North American country, because culturally, economically and population-wise, the majority are west of Tehuantepec (thus in North America), including the country's capital, the main native culture, the other two main cities (plus the other considered "global").
However, since the US stance is that everything south of the Grande isn't North America, and the US culture has spreaded throughout the world, the rest of the world sees Mexico as Central/South America.
Sincerely though, I believe the best school of thought with North/South America is the Jet Punk style, otherwise known as the CONCACAF/CONMEBOL divide (with the clear exceptions of the Guyanas).
I've never heard anyone in the US say Mexico is part of South America. I certainly learned in school that it's part of North America, as did everyone else I know.
In the US, people tend to consider the Americas as two continents, in which case, Central America, including Mexico, is clearly a sub-region of North America.
In much of the rest of the world, America is considered as one continent, which allows for a looser definition of the sub-regions. In this context, Mexico is often grouped by cultural proximity with other nations into Central America, which is considered distinct from North America (ie. USA and Canada) and South America.
Both positions have their merit.
However, I've never heard a good argument for Mexico being in South America...
I've never heard of the North American-South American divide being the US-Mexico border. I've heard it as the Colombia-Panama border, the Panama Canal, and the Darien Gap, but never at the US's southern border.
what? each european country you have been to? let me guess, you haven't ever been to europe? haha. I really can't believe this, there might be one weird country (still don't think so, rather you have talked to 1 confused person) but definitely not "generally accepted in all of europe"
I have never heard of Mexico being seen as south-america anywhere. Though I am sure there is atleast one person that (could) think that, since people think the weirdest things, I am sure there is atleast one person that thinks australia is in Europe too. But generally accepted?? no
Maybe you are mixing things up and are confused with central america, however you mentioned this yourself already so this kind of rules that out.
I do remember we were specifically taught some countries were Middle-America, can't remember if it was treated as a continent though, but it was emphasized enough to make it feel weird to call Mexico North-America though. But we would never call South-America, it is above Panama, so how could it be?
Maybe the fact that both North as Northern America could be translated with the same word in my language (Noord) did not help. Mexico+Northern-America=North-America. Northern America is basically North-America above Mexico (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_America). And that might be the view of what North-America is for some Europeans.
But Mexico is no more in South-America than Paraguay is in North-America
I read "narcocorrido" and thought it's so obvious it's related to drugs it must be a tricky question and marked false.. forgot people taking quizz don't necessarily speak Spanish or Portuguese.
I mean, I don't speak Spanish or Portuguese, but I assumed that "narco" was probably related to narcotics. Kind of wild that that's a music genre, though.
Considering that outlaw songs (song praising an outlaw life or an specific outlaw guy) are a thing in other places... Narcocorridos are just sung in Spanish, and specifically about Mexican outlaws.
It doesn't take away that it's a bad music genre, though.
Fun fact: the emperor who was installed was the little brother of Franz Joseph, the long-ruling emperor of Austria Hungary. Because the Mexican people executed this emperor, he was no longer alive to become heir to the throne. That's why Franz Ferdinand became heir to the throne! It's Mexico's fault that World War I happened!
Nah, it's definitely Mexico's fault. And since the resolution of WW I was pretty much the cause of WW II, Mexico's to blame for that one too. And the Cold War. You could go so far as to say Mexico is even worse than Belgium.
I don't think the answer should be changed, I just find it curious.
Mexicans will tell you we're a North American country, because culturally, economically and population-wise, the majority are west of Tehuantepec (thus in North America), including the country's capital, the main native culture, the other two main cities (plus the other considered "global").
However, since the US stance is that everything south of the Grande isn't North America, and the US culture has spreaded throughout the world, the rest of the world sees Mexico as Central/South America.
Sincerely though, I believe the best school of thought with North/South America is the Jet Punk style, otherwise known as the CONCACAF/CONMEBOL divide (with the clear exceptions of the Guyanas).
In the US, people tend to consider the Americas as two continents, in which case, Central America, including Mexico, is clearly a sub-region of North America.
In much of the rest of the world, America is considered as one continent, which allows for a looser definition of the sub-regions. In this context, Mexico is often grouped by cultural proximity with other nations into Central America, which is considered distinct from North America (ie. USA and Canada) and South America.
Both positions have their merit.
However, I've never heard a good argument for Mexico being in South America...
I have never heard of Mexico being seen as south-america anywhere. Though I am sure there is atleast one person that (could) think that, since people think the weirdest things, I am sure there is atleast one person that thinks australia is in Europe too. But generally accepted?? no
Maybe you are mixing things up and are confused with central america, however you mentioned this yourself already so this kind of rules that out.
Maybe the fact that both North as Northern America could be translated with the same word in my language (Noord) did not help. Mexico+Northern-America=North-America. Northern America is basically North-America above Mexico (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_America). And that might be the view of what North-America is for some Europeans.
But Mexico is no more in South-America than Paraguay is in North-America
It doesn't take away that it's a bad music genre, though.
I see that "volcanos" is a valid spelling in the dictionary. Looks wrong though, doesn't it.