Why are the average ages so old? It's not the baby boom. In fact, modern birth figures are just as high as the baby boom. It's the fact that modern children have more diverse names. This year's top name would have been 8th in 1970.
Edit 2024: This is no longer strictly true. The birth rate has fallen off a cliff.
The names diversified due to a larger amount of people from other countries and ethinicities as well. Only Maria is a spanish name here, I believe than now names such as Isabella are way more common due to the Mexicans. Add to that names like LaBarbara that virtually did not exist some years ago and to the custom of naming diferent names other than the grandparents and you have your diversity.
Girls' names tend to have a greater variety than boys' names. You are more likely to meet a girl who has an uncommon first name than a boy who has an uncommon first name.
Okay, wait. There is no Megan, Kaitlyn, Sophia, Mia, Grace, Ella, Ava, Annie, Olivia, Sydney or Alice, Yet there is Brenda, Debra and SHIRLEY? Outrageous.
Either because it is the oldest age, and the Quizmaster was expressing surprise that it was such a high number, or the average age was actually 68 factorial.
I always think I'm going to do better on these quizzes, but these Most Common Girls' Names ones are HARD! Boys' I can do, but Dios mio there are just so many female names and I can never think of them all!!
Not sure why but I also do way better on the male version of this quiz. My personal best on the female version of the quiz is 33 out of 50, but I just took the male version after taking this one and got all but one answer correct. Weird.
Wow, both my name and a variant of my name are on this list... and a variant of my middle name. It doesn't usually top the charts, so it must be one of those that is consistently used but not overly popular xD
It's not racist, it's stereotypical. They are largely different words kal, as I thought you'd be aware.
How Karen specifically got chosen is probably due to Reddit or other social media platform, but it essentially only applies to conservative mothers in the United States due to their proclivity to "speak to the manager." More specifically, it applies to women who are baby boomers/generation x which are generations that have been proven to expect to be handed things unfairly because they "deserve the respect" or because they feel superior to the workforce which is oftentimes in much younger generations than them. This could also be an age gap thing as opposed to a generational one.
It would be racist to assume all white women are, or only white women can be, "Karens" for example. It is not, however, racist to denigrate a person based on their haircut, and/or overall personality, especially when the examples go beyond picture evidence into videos of genuinely disrespectful behavior
Ah yes, every racist term explicitly contains a race within it. Everyone knows that. Ergo... every racial slur you can probably think of but I'm not going to type... none of them are actually racist! Brilliant.
I'm not sure "Karen" is racist, but I don't think it's outrageous to suggest that it is. Some accusations of racism against other races are far more tenuous than what Kal is proposing. I think many accusations of racism are unfounded, but get taken seriously anyway. If you set the "Karen" thing among those many, many overstated accusations, it's not out of place. It certainly has a racial component to it.
We definitely live in a time when racism is over identified. But, simultaneously, we live in a time when racism is increasingly prevalent, obvious, out in the open... somewhat ironically those who tend to over-identify it in some places also are the ones who openly, proudly, unashamedly engage in it in other places. They might tell you that their racism isn't racism because racism is a system of oppression and the people they are racist against they've decided are not among the oppressed. But it's clearly racism. And even though these types also often claim to be against the racism they identify in others, they don't seem to understand that racism of any kind makes racism of all other kinds worse.
I didn't do great. Its tough for people under like 20 because the names are so old fashioned. I tried aunts names, teachers names and the really popular ones. It didn't get me very far...
Consider Sam for Samantha and Peggy for Margaret (the latter won't cut off users who write the full name)? You already have Chris for Christine / Christina.
Edit 2024: This is no longer strictly true. The birth rate has fallen off a cliff.
My uncle married 3 different women all named Karen.
How Karen specifically got chosen is probably due to Reddit or other social media platform, but it essentially only applies to conservative mothers in the United States due to their proclivity to "speak to the manager." More specifically, it applies to women who are baby boomers/generation x which are generations that have been proven to expect to be handed things unfairly because they "deserve the respect" or because they feel superior to the workforce which is oftentimes in much younger generations than them. This could also be an age gap thing as opposed to a generational one.
It would be racist to assume all white women are, or only white women can be, "Karens" for example. It is not, however, racist to denigrate a person based on their haircut, and/or overall personality, especially when the examples go beyond picture evidence into videos of genuinely disrespectful behavior
I've been married 5 times, each time to a woman named Brenda.
It's a hell of a coincidence, and as my mother, Brenda, used to say...
Sam for samantha
Lauran, lauryn for lauren
Jess for jessica
Racheal for Rachel
Oh, well...