The two countries were West Germany and East Germany beforehand, so how could either be "annexed" into the other? The Germans describe it as unification.
Technically, the GDR ("East Germany") dissolved in five countries, who then joined the FRG ("West Germany"). It's really a little bit wierd to read it as an annexation.
Yeah, that seems like a bit of a stretch to me too. Bonn is not the capital of a Greater West Germany today. The two became one. I suppose one could argue that the political system of the west was maintained after unification, but that still seems to be stretching the definition.
The confusion about this topic likely stems from the fact that the two countries are colloquially known as "West" and "East" Germany internationally. Technically though, they were the Federal Republic and the Democratic Republic. Modern-day Germany retains the name Federal Republic, its Basic Law, and its political system. In the minds of Germans, it was a unification because the people were unified. But to quote Wikipedia: "The post-1990 united Germany is not a successor state, but an enlarged continuation of the former West Germany."
If we're going by the dictionary definition of "annex" (and if we're using the word, I don't see why we wouldn't), it means "to add (territory) to one's own territory by appropriation" (appropriation: the action of taking something for one's own use, typically without the owner's permission). I therefore don't see how "annex" fits here, since: (1) W. Germany did not *acquire* E. Germany "for its own use", as W. Germany ceased upon unification to exist, and the new country officially became just "Germany"; (2) The "without the the owner's permission" obviously does not apply, as the E. German parliament agreed wholeheartedly and participated fully. (3) It was completed via treaty. (I know some actual annexations had treaties were forced to be signed, but this one was obviously not done under duress).
It was annexation in the sense that they didn't form a new country together. The Federal Republic of Germany, previously commonly known as West Germany, continued to exist in enlarged form with the same name, laws, constitution, EU membership etc, which were gradually applied also in the eastern part.
I knew East Germany was unified with the West in 1990, but I wouldn't call it an 'annexation'. Also, 'West Germany' ceased to exist after the reunification.
Yes and no. In English, West Germany ceased to exist. In German, West Germany was the Federal Republic of Germany, or in German the Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Once East Germany became part of West Germany, the unified Germany was still the Federal Republic of Germany (Bundesrepublik Deutschland). The name in German stayed the same but the English shorthand changed.
Australia signed the Australia Act in 1986 and Canada singed the Canada Act in 1982 which basically is a treaty that syas the Britain can longer rule them. If you look on their wikepedia page you can find something on the acts.
That's more of a legal issue and not strictly an independence issue as stated in the question. Australia considered themselves independent when they adopted the Statute of Westminster in 1942 (backdated to 1931) which allowed legislative independence. The 1986 Australia Act merely prevented the UK from legislating on behalf of Australia (which they could only do at Australia's request anyway) and severed all ties between the two nations at a legal level (British precedent was for instance no longer binding). But to claim that Australia (or indeed Canada) was not independent until this point would be wrong since they were very much no longer a part of Britain. I guess the issue is whether the question is asking for complete independence or just independence. I would argue Australia and New Zealand still had some ties to Britain until 1986 but were 'independent' a lot earlier
According to this Wikipedia page, the last country to gain independence from the UK was Brunei, followed by St. Kitts and Nevis, Antigua and Barbuda, Belize and by Vanuatu before you can get to Zimbabwe.
Gadafi (sp?) was executed in Libya during the Arab Spring rebellions since Saddam Hussein was executed in Iraq.
Though I guess it wasn't technically an execution because he was never put up for trial. He was hunted down and killed by a mob. Not sure if that is considered an execution or not.
My first instinct, on seeing the instructions, was this quiz should be the yellow box format....having done it I can see why it is not. Tough. Nice one, well done.
Last country to be annexed is Western Sahara. They were annexed before they even got a chance to vote for their freedom. It is still illegally annexed by Morocco, and Morocco is profiting from resources that belong to the Sahrawis.
Can you accept Germany for East Germany? I know they are not the same thing but I suppose a lot of people (like me) tried Germany for the last annexed one and thought it wasn't DDR
Wow the percentages for syria and germany are extremely low, ridiculously so for germany.
great quiz btw more things on here that you "should" know (though I did badly) than on some other quizzes. (And sometimes things you learn at school, like the name if the brother of the nephew of a lieutenant in some war somewhere)
Needs an update for the Winter Olympics question. Barbados also might count for the "get rid of their monarchy" question (though it's not really *their* monarchy)
Yes, I think Barbados should be there too! The monarch, despite being British, was the Queen of Barbados as well, simultaneously holding the title of the Queen of the UK and 14 other nations.
Commonwealth realms are all independent nations and their monarchies are really *theirs*. No one calls Elizabeth II the Queen of the United Kingdom in Australia or New Zealand. She just happens to hold all these titles despite those countries being independent.
In short, the monarch is the same person, but hold legally distinct and separate titles in 15 different countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_annexation
Though I guess it wasn't technically an execution because he was never put up for trial. He was hunted down and killed by a mob. Not sure if that is considered an execution or not.
great quiz btw more things on here that you "should" know (though I did badly) than on some other quizzes. (And sometimes things you learn at school, like the name if the brother of the nephew of a lieutenant in some war somewhere)
Commonwealth realms are all independent nations and their monarchies are really *theirs*. No one calls Elizabeth II the Queen of the United Kingdom in Australia or New Zealand. She just happens to hold all these titles despite those countries being independent.
In short, the monarch is the same person, but hold legally distinct and separate titles in 15 different countries.