Prior to Paul VI (1963–1978), popes almost never left Italy. Paul VI was the first to leave Italy since 1809, and was the first to travel in an airplane.
Well that's good to know, because if any popes prior to 1809 travelled by airplane, then either the Wright Brothers are time travelers or DaVinci was WAY better than we knew.
Ouch. One look at his "plane" and you can see why it wasn't going to work.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cl%C3%A9ment_Ader
"Using a circular track at Satory, Ader carried out taxiing trials on 12 October 1897 and two days later attempted a flight. After a short run the machine was caught by a gust of wind, slewed off the track, and came to a stop. After this the French army withdrew its funding, but kept the results secret. The commission released in November 1910 the official reports on Ader's attempted flights, stating that they were unsuccessful."
If you can't see the difference between an airplane flying figure eights and a bat-shaped glider that can't even get off the ground, then I don't know.
Pfff, those are just the official reports. It flew like a dream but the authorities changed the records to make it look like a total failure when the batwing patent was bought out by Wayne Enterprises and further development was taken underground.
I suppose that Ierland's "fault" is having a much lower number of population that most countries that make the list. As I see it, the surprise it's not that Ireland is not there. The surprise is that Malta is.
Nah official visits. JPII in 1990 and 2001, Benedict in 2010 and Francis last year. It's close, very Catholic and St Paul personally brought Christianity there.
There are a few. But I think they probably went to these places because they are the location of several of the most important Christian holy sites in the world.
Also I have no idea how many trips there were before 1809, as they were rare according to the comment QM made above, but Jordan was overwhelmingly Christian prior to 634 AD, Israel was prior to 637 AD (and was again at various points since then), and the Ottomans didn't capture Constantinople (Turkey) until 1453. By 634 AD they were already on Pope #80, and by the fall of Constantinople there had been hundreds. And prior to the East-West Christian schism of 1054, all of these Christians were united under the church of Rome. Maybe some small number of these early popes would have decided to travel to the Imperial capital or to the Holy Land?
Curious and intrigued by this possibility I did a bit of poking around. Found out some interesting facts.
1. Apparently the very first modern official papal visit in history, by Paul VI, took place in 1964 and was to Israel. He went both to establish diplomatic ties with the newish country and visit the holy sites there.
2. Popes traveled to Constantinople in 523, 547, 680, and 710. Another was abducted and sent there for trial in 653. Not sure if that counts as a papal visit or not.
3. The visit to Constantinople in 523 by Pope John I was the first time a pope traveled outside of Rome willingly.
4. Pope Liberius (352-366) was exiled to a city in Thrace, very near to Turkey, though currently the city is within the territory of Greece.
5. Urban II (1088-1099) was the first pope to travel extensively outside of Rome, though the farthest he got was France. Later he'd call for the 1st Crusade. Maybe looking to open up new travel opportunities?
6. Paul VI was also the first pope to ever leave Europe, according to what I found. If accurate, I guess this means that...
7. the older popes that visited Constantinople must not have crossed the Bosporus. and
8. All papal visits to Israel took place after 1964.
9. Pope John Paul II traveled more miles than all of his papal predecessors combined, and currently is still the most-traveled pope in history.
10. If all of the above is true and counted in the stats for this quiz then it appears my speculation was true and popes have not actually visited Turkey since its Islamification? Either that or the quiz may undercount the number of visits there. Or... those visits aren't counted as going to Turkey since Turkey did not exist at the time, and Constantinople was the capital of the Roman Empire.
The first 500 years of popes were real homebodies.
(joke)... the truth is that travel, especially international travel, is for the most part something only modern humans do with anything approaching regularity; unless your occupation was that of a trader or sailor you generally stayed put and that seems to have been the rule for popes, as well.
The papal visits to Constantinople I could dig up all took place before the east/west schism. At that time the Church was still unified and they were really just the bishops of their respective cities. But the imperial capital had been moved to Constantinople.
If you're wondering why Poland was visited so many times and all these surprising countries appear, it's because of Pope John Paul II. He visited 123 countries during his papacy, and visited Poland 9 times, France 8, the US 7, and 5 in Mexico and Spain.
I'm surprised to see that the top countries only have 11 visits each. The pope doesn't travel as often as I would've guessed (at least when it comes to "official business" trips).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cl%C3%A9ment_Ader
"Using a circular track at Satory, Ader carried out taxiing trials on 12 October 1897 and two days later attempted a flight. After a short run the machine was caught by a gust of wind, slewed off the track, and came to a stop. After this the French army withdrew its funding, but kept the results secret. The commission released in November 1910 the official reports on Ader's attempted flights, stating that they were unsuccessful."
This illusion was shattered for good when the Wright Brothers visited France in 1908, flying figure eights above Le Mans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wright_brothers#Public_showing
If you can't see the difference between an airplane flying figure eights and a bat-shaped glider that can't even get off the ground, then I don't know.
Why
I'm thinking that's the response you were looking for.
Maybe I'll compile a list for Wikipedia when I have time.
India is planned for 4th visit next year.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/local/2015-papal-visit/pope-visits/
Last time I checked, there were very, very few catholics in these countries, unless these visits were for political purposes?
1. Apparently the very first modern official papal visit in history, by Paul VI, took place in 1964 and was to Israel. He went both to establish diplomatic ties with the newish country and visit the holy sites there.
2. Popes traveled to Constantinople in 523, 547, 680, and 710. Another was abducted and sent there for trial in 653. Not sure if that counts as a papal visit or not.
3. The visit to Constantinople in 523 by Pope John I was the first time a pope traveled outside of Rome willingly.
4. Pope Liberius (352-366) was exiled to a city in Thrace, very near to Turkey, though currently the city is within the territory of Greece.
5. Urban II (1088-1099) was the first pope to travel extensively outside of Rome, though the farthest he got was France. Later he'd call for the 1st Crusade. Maybe looking to open up new travel opportunities?
7. the older popes that visited Constantinople must not have crossed the Bosporus. and
8. All papal visits to Israel took place after 1964.
9. Pope John Paul II traveled more miles than all of his papal predecessors combined, and currently is still the most-traveled pope in history.
10. If all of the above is true and counted in the stats for this quiz then it appears my speculation was true and popes have not actually visited Turkey since its Islamification? Either that or the quiz may undercount the number of visits there. Or... those visits aren't counted as going to Turkey since Turkey did not exist at the time, and Constantinople was the capital of the Roman Empire.
(joke)... the truth is that travel, especially international travel, is for the most part something only modern humans do with anything approaching regularity; unless your occupation was that of a trader or sailor you generally stayed put and that seems to have been the rule for popes, as well.