Fine quiz, and hope this isn't annoying, but... while many of these could be considered loosely based on a true story and that's fine, Hollywood does that all the time, some others I don't think really count even by that definition. Most notably 8 Mile, which, although it borrows a couple elements of the story from Eminem's life it is in no way meant to be a true story. It's pure fiction, maybe inspired somewhat by a true story.
and then there's Titanic, which although set against the backdrop of a meticulously recreated true event in history, is also the story of a couple that are totally 100% fictional. The main story of Titanic and the two main characters are not in any way based on a true story, it's just that they happened to be living in the real world at a specific time and place. This would be like saying Anchorman is based on a true story because there really was a city called San Diego in the 1970s. I think The Hurt Locker might also fall into this category.
Actually Anchorman's not even a good example since the events of that movie actually are supposed to tell the true story of something that happened in history- the integration of female news anchors in network affiliate newscasts. That actually happened. On the other hand there's no evidence at all that first class girls on the Titanic were slumming around in steerage with penniless artists. hmmm... okay a better example would be saying that The Wedding Singer was based on a true story because the 80s really happened. Even though all the main characters in the movie never existed (aside from Billy Idol) and were not inspired by anybody who ever existed. But the historical backdrop of the story was accurate. Still, it's the setting of the story. Not the actual story.
I've never seen 8 Mile so I can't discuss that one, but The Hurt Locker was based on reports of a journalist who was actually embedded with a bomb squad in Iraq. While the characters were fictional, I think they were based on people who really exist. Titanic, as you said, was not based on any known persons but because the setting was crucial to the story, for me it fit the caveat of fiction based on a true event. The Wedding Singer was not based on real people or any real event. A time period is not an event and is too broad. To make it fit the caveat, it would have to have been about a real or fictional singer from a real wedding, such as a person who sang at the wedding of Charles and Di.
Okay what about Forrest Gump. Is that a true story? There are plenty of real events in that movie. The integration at the University of Alabama. The Vietnam War. The assassination of several different leaders. And so on and so on. Does that make it a true story? I think just because the backdrop of Titanic is so incredibly dramatic people start to think that the story of the film IS the backdrop of the film, but I would simply disagree. The story of Titanic is the love story between Jack and Rose, and this is not in any way based on a true story.
Didn't know about The Hurt Locker. You might be right.
I think that's different. Braveheart takes a lot of liberties and has many inaccuracies, but William Wallace and Edward the Longshanks were real people and the story being told is supposed to be a reflection of true events. Similarly, 300... obviously there were not goat men and cleaver-armed demon executioners in the Persian army, and Xerxes wasn't a 10 foot tall fetishist ladyboy, but the events in the film, though presented in a highly stylized fashion, are actually based on history. Even some of the corniest lines of dialogue that most people assume is pure comic book invention are actually lifted straight from the accounts by Herodotus.
that's because 300 was based on the graphic novel an not te actual event if you want a film based more so on the event wath The 300 Spartans which was made in the 50s or 60s
I agree with others that Titanic shouldn't be on here. I saw the qualification the quizmaster added above, but all based-on-a-true-story films are in some sense fictionalized. What gets me with Titanic is that the two major plot points (the heart necklace and the Jack/Rose fiasco) are made-up, so it literally can't be based on a true "story." The backdrop of the film is based on actual events, but the film itself is not.
for instance, the battle which he won in the film and gets knighted for..... Wallace had already been executed by the time the battle even took place..... and he sure as hell never slept with the princess let alone got her pregnant
The History Buffs channel on YouTube pointed out that the princess at the time was in France and only about 8 years old at the time so Wallace would have had to have been a teleporting pedophile.
THANK YOU for the additional info! I hate when people cry about how this or that is totally unreal and the movie doesn't deserve to be titled as "based on a true story". Even if there's just an event that actually happened but all the people are fictional you can use that phrase.
A better clue than Titanic would be A Night to Remember. That was actually a pretty accurate depiction of the sinking. Other movies that were largely true to events include Gettysburg and Tora Tora Tora.
I can't remember the difference between Dangerous Minds and The Substitute besides one has Tom Berenger and the other has Michelle Pfeiffer who, apparently, played a Marine too?
and then there's Titanic, which although set against the backdrop of a meticulously recreated true event in history, is also the story of a couple that are totally 100% fictional. The main story of Titanic and the two main characters are not in any way based on a true story, it's just that they happened to be living in the real world at a specific time and place. This would be like saying Anchorman is based on a true story because there really was a city called San Diego in the 1970s. I think The Hurt Locker might also fall into this category.
Didn't know about The Hurt Locker. You might be right.
for instance, the battle which he won in the film and gets knighted for..... Wallace had already been executed by the time the battle even took place..... and he sure as hell never slept with the princess let alone got her pregnant
It's like saying Rise of the Planet of the Apes is based on a true story because drugs have indeed been tested on chimps before.
Adding the backdrop of some factual event to a fictional tale does not in any way make the tale 'based on a true story'