Yes it does matter -- they should change the names of these conferences. It was extremely foolish and short-sighted to have given conferences names such as Big 10 or Big 12 in the first place. This would have been like originally naming the US "United 13 States of America" -- ignorant enough to think the number of states (or, in this case number of teams in conferences) would never change.
Is "Fighting" really necessary for Illinois' nickname when "Golden" is not necessary for Minnesota's? I kept thinking I had misspelled a 6-letter word -- granted, putting all those I's and L's together can look confusing -- until I went back and put "Fighting" in front.
From 1971 thru 1987 Illinois' side helmet decals featured a single word: "ILLINI". If they refer to themselves simply as the "ILLINI", then I think that is a compelling reason to accept just "Illini" as a correct answer.
As an Illinois alum, I would support the shortened version on the quiz. There is a limit - Nittany is absolutely necessary as part of Penn State, for example. And I can see how a Minnesota alum might support the shortened form of the team name. But - using the example of how the team refers to itself - at Northwestern, they say (all the time) "Go Cats" and the team of course is the Wildcats. I don't think my son (recent NU alum) would agree with just using "Cats" for the school. Oh, and before I forget, "What's a Hoosier?" :) Sorry IU alums, I had to do that.
MSU and OSU should be accepted for Mich. St. and Ohio St.
UMAA, UMTC, UIUC, UMD/UMCP, UNL should also be accepted for Michigan (Ann Arbor), Minnesota (Twin Cities), Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), Maryland (College Park), and Nebraska (Lincoln)
UIUC is a pretty specific usage for the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Just "Illinois" could technically refer to any of the three campuses - Chicago and Sangamon (Springfield) are also home to separate campuses, albeit with independent sports (in the case of UIC - UofI Chicago - I don't think UIS actually has a sports program, at least Division I level).
Not to mention Michigan handed you guys a whooping in Ann Arbor 49-10. The B1G conference is messed up with PSU, UM, MSU, and OSU all in the same division with Wisconsin being the only good team in the other division. Maybe we should go back to the Leaders/legends for the divisions rather than east/west so we can actually avoid those three or four way ties in the east division.
This should be labeled as a Big Ten Sports quiz, as any other usage would include the University of Chicago, which de-emphasized athletics and left the Big Ten many years ago in sports but remains in academics. Also, when you have the chance always use B1G when writing Big Ten!
I think different people (myself included) would appreciate some more context along with the question or instructions, as not everyone knows what big10 means. I could've gotten some answers right with a few extra words in the instructions or title.
Agreed. What happened to the Pac 12 was a disgrace.
Also, with the new licensing and transfer rules I wonder what incentive there is for small schools to compete.
In the past, maybe a school like Indiana could get lucky with a few recruits and make a run. Now a powerhouse like Ohio State can just poach their best players and say "come to Ohio State and you'll make 5x as much on jersey sales".
What incentive do the smaller schools have to just get trampled every year?
They had 14 schools and somehow the first alphabetically is an "I". They add 4 new schools and the average name moves skews even further to "Z". Nice symmetrical conference you have there.
MSU and OSU should be accepted for Mich. St. and Ohio St.
UMAA, UMTC, UIUC, UMD/UMCP, UNL should also be accepted for Michigan (Ann Arbor), Minnesota (Twin Cities), Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), Maryland (College Park), and Nebraska (Lincoln)
Only Americans, and American knowledge, matter
the rest of us can just suck it up -_-
Even worse when UCLA and USC are in
Also, with the new licensing and transfer rules I wonder what incentive there is for small schools to compete.
In the past, maybe a school like Indiana could get lucky with a few recruits and make a run. Now a powerhouse like Ohio State can just poach their best players and say "come to Ohio State and you'll make 5x as much on jersey sales".
What incentive do the smaller schools have to just get trampled every year?
- sincerely an Oregon State student and fan