Major kudos to the Bears, Packers, Chiefs, Bengals and Lions for not selling out. Only a matter of time before we see Viagra Stadium or Preparation-H Field. *sigh*
William Clay Ford purchased controlling interest in the Lions in 1963. The Ford family has held that controlling interest ever since. The field does bear the name of a long-time owner of the club, so I cut the Lions slack on that.
The Steelers used to play in Three Rivers Stadium. No rivers paid the Steelers any money for the use of that name. Unless the Steelers decided to name their stadium "Heinz Field" out of the goodness of their hearts and a sense of community promotion, they sold out to a company that happens to be in close proximity to the stadium. An example of the Steelers not selling out would be "Rooney Stadium" or "Knoll Field", for example.
Ford Field is named for the company, not the family. "The naming rights were purchased by the Ford Motor Company at $40 million over 20 years" - Wikipedia. And if you look at it from above, it has a giant Ford logo painted on it.
What really sort of amazes me is how many foreign owned companies have their names on US stadiums and Mercedes has two - both in the South. How did that happen? And Nisson is on the stadium in Nashville - I guess they were ready for some football. Imagine if Northrop-Grumman was suddenly slapped on the side of Wembley Stadium or Camp Nou was renamed Lockheed Martin. It stings the national pride and team loyalty just a bit.
Not sure how long those teams will hold out. Ford Field is named for the company, although the Ford family does own the team. The Packers, Bears, and Chiefs play in stadiums built over 40 years ago. When they need money for a new stadium, corporate sponsorship will look pretty appealing. It is promising though that they are all family enterprises. The Bengals, Chiefs, and Bears have all been in the same respective families since their inceptions, so there's a stronger sense of tradition, and the teams are not owned by corporate raiders. The Packers have no private ownership. They are the only publicly-owned team in the four major sports. The Bengals play in the only stadium built in the new millennium that does not have corporate sponsorship. Their owner, Mike Brown, named the stadium after his father, the founder and first coach of the team. That's awesome, but I wouldn't expect other owners to follow suit.
Correction, for Pittsburgh, that would be "Noll Field". As in Chuck Noll. The Knoll I knew was George Knoll, my elderly, WWI vet/neighbor across the street who I would visit & play rummy with & drink black coffee with to keep him company when I was a kid.
Although it certainly looks sleazy to have the name of a company on your stadium, I'm all for it if it reduces the taxpayer dollars spent. Stadiums are ridiculously expensive and would demolish city budgets if they're not subsidized by big corporations.
Now, I know that corporate named stadiums still use plenty of public money, but every bit helps...
There's absolutely no reason to spend a single taxpayer dollar for a multi-billion dollar franchise to enrich themselves further. If it's not profitable, don't build it. That's such a basic fundamental of business.
I dont know where you got that. Lincoln Financial Field has been the name of the new place since it opened, and the previous place was Veterans Stadium. Before that was Franklin Field, and before that... well, if you go that far back, youre too old.
The worst example of corporate naming I've ever seen is the National Car Rental Center, which was the name of the Florida Panthers' arena from 1998-2002, and which sounds not so much like an arena but more like, well, the place you'd go if you needed to rent a car.
Now its State Farm Stadium. Not much better. Given the commercials that run during NFL games nowadays, I would say we are overdue for a Cialis stadium.
The point of the quiz is to know the CURRENT names. If you don't know them, learn them. If you don't want to learn them then you're not going to get a good score.
I was set to jump on the bandwagon here and complain about all the corporate naming of stadiums until I realized that my beloved baseball Cardinals play in Busch Stadium in St. Louis, and I can't imagine seeing them in a stadium with any other name. I have to wonder if fans complained in 1954 when it was changed from Sportsmans Park to Busch Stadium. At least Anheuser-Busch has a long history in the city.
There are degrees to it. A stadium with a name that is both a person's name and the name of a company (Busch, Ford, etc.) sounds a little better to our ears than one that is more blatantly corporate (EverBank, StubHub, etc.)
Ander, that's not exactly the same thing. Busch Stadium, at least in name, has been around longer than we have. You're right about the history connection. I can't even begin to imagine the Cards playing anywhere else. Now, if they try to change the name to Inbev or whatever the new corporate name is I'll start making protest signs. Wanna help?
Can you accept "Factory of Sadness" for the Browns? That seems like the more appropriate answer to me.
Also, I'm mainly posting this as a joke, but for the record, Wikipedia does automatically redirect from "factory of sadness" to the article on the Browns' stadium.
Otherwise known as Random Clunky Business Names That You Don't Remember Because They Have No Bearing On Team History And The List Of Names Changes Every Time You Blink Anyways So We Just Call Them By The Team Name.
Suggestion to QM: Accept Colosseum and Mile High for Denver and Oakland. If the commentators say "we're in Mile High stadium," or "Welcome to the Colosseum," then they should be accepted
BTW I hate the PATS just an example
The Steelers used to play in Three Rivers Stadium. No rivers paid the Steelers any money for the use of that name. Unless the Steelers decided to name their stadium "Heinz Field" out of the goodness of their hearts and a sense of community promotion, they sold out to a company that happens to be in close proximity to the stadium. An example of the Steelers not selling out would be "Rooney Stadium" or "Knoll Field", for example.
Now, I know that corporate named stadiums still use plenty of public money, but every bit helps...
Also, I'm mainly posting this as a joke, but for the record, Wikipedia does automatically redirect from "factory of sadness" to the article on the Browns' stadium.
Uhh, the Raiders have certainly not been playing in Oakland continuously since 1966