They're only off by 2%. I imagine people who don't follow baseball can recall the Red Sox easily enough, as they are one of the signature teams, and get a ton of media coverage. The White Sox, despite a long history, have become an afterthought. They've been mediocre or terrible for a decade, and they are totally eclipsed by the Cubs in the Chicago market. I think that's enough to explain a 2% difference.
I was thinking the same thing: Dream, Sky, Sun, Fever, Liberty, Lynx, Mercury, Storm.... I guessed several of those in case there were colleges using those names.
Seems to me they should be included in this as they are pro sport. But whats the cutoff - the soccer team in Atlanta has reached critical mass, its popular. In Philly, the box lacrosse games were decently attended.
Waiting for them to decide on their new team name before I update all the quizzes. But it would be very meta if they changed their name to simply "Football Team".
The people offended by the past name I doubt spend any time watching football. They have to spend the majority of their time being offended or it would never have become an issue. I'm sure they could find a way to be offended by the name Football Team, as well. Perhaps on behalf of all international soccer fans who don't watch? (since they're being offended on behalf of other people in this case, too, polls of indigenous Americans find that the majority either have no problem with the Redskins name or find it positive)
FWIW I really, really hope the Washington Football Team keeps their name as that. I actually think it's good branding, in a somewhat ironic way. But at the very least it can't be worse than the Browns name/logo.
Berlin Thunder, Rhein Fire, Frankfurt Galaxy.............
Dr. Fellow Canadian, I presume?
Avalanche - Snowflake
Kraken - Tentacle
Mammoth - Tusk
Wild - Animal
Heat - Degree (see above)
Magic - Magician
Thunder - Clap, Peal or Rumble
Jazz - Musician
Red and White Sox - Obviously . . .