The spelling isnt always how you pronounce it, so people who know its Pittsburgh but doesnt know it has a "h" at the end will be confused and ultimately have less fun doing the quiz, because they failed since the english language likes to pronounce things differently to how its spelled
I disagree, this isn't a spelling quiz. If you know Pittsburgh has a team and you slightly misspell it you have still demonstrated that you know the answer.
haha! i was down to one left and couldn't figure it out. with three seconds to go i typed in cincinnati real quick and got it with one second left. i live in cincinnati
Green Bay was the only one I didn't get, even though I'm in NFL follower. I was going round the states in my head and only considered Milwaukee; easy to miss Washington if you're doing that, of course.
The Bay Area doesn't include Sacramento. Nobody, when they talk about the Bay Area, thinks of Sacramento. It's halfway to Nevada, that'd be like calling Bakersfield part of Los Angeles.
As I live near Sacramento. We don't like to be associated with the Bay Area. We like just being Sacramento. Not San Jose, San Francisco, Oakland, etc. Since Sacramento doesn't even touch the San Francisco Bay and we are about a 2 hour drive away.
Also the Angels are in Anaheim. But we're only 25 miles from LA. Which reminds me, I have a great idea for an NFL team: the Los Angeles Chargers of San Diego.
I could have sworn the Texas Rangers play our of Arlington, but when I put that in it says it is a wrong answer. It is either missing, or is associated with another option on the list but neither happens when entered.
I've tried learning these the past couple of weeks and managed to get them all on other quizzes. So uhm.. why isn't Oakland here? From Oakland AS. The one you get when you try to guess "Astros" on a quiz.
Its a little deceiving having San Diego and Vancouver out of order...I was trying to think of another San________ metro area with a team and missed Vancouver because of it...
Not until the Raiders actually move to Vegas, which will happen in either 2019 or 2020... Which is really sad to Oakland: having to host during at least two years a team whose owner has shown them the middle finger.
+1. I'm kind of hoping the city of Oakland shows the owners how they feel about the move by having a mostly empty stadium the next few seasons. But of course, that won't happen.
I know next to nothing about the NFL, NBA, NHL or Major League (never having been to the US), except that they pertain to American football, basketball, hockey and (I had to search up this last one) baseball. But I still got 42/49 by guessing all American and Canadian cities I could remember.
Does anyone know top 5 cities by number of "lost" franchises?
This list seems overpopulated to me, but I don't know much about sports or the corruption associated with it.
I wouldn't think that a city like Detroit would warrant 4 teams.
I think some of these have populations with very big crime issues, like San Francisco, Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, DC, Baltimore, St Louis..
Seems like they wouldn't have money to waste on something like corporate sports. I wonder if it's a new phenomenon to see such large metropolises in the modern world take downturns. I guess patterns repeat in larger ways as the global population grows.
"Lost franchises?" Only currently existing teams are on this list. Out of any of the cities you mentioned only St. Louis has recently lost a team. Your judgement on whether a team can survive in a city is quite far off, and it has nothing to do with corruption.
Since 2000, Vancouver, Charlotte, Montreal, Seattle, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis, San Diego, Oakland, and Phoenix have lost sports teams. Very few if any are linked to crime rates or corruption (expect maybe Oakland).
Please include MLS as a major sport. Its fan base is similar, if not larger and certainly faster growing than NHL (and probably MLB, as far as growth).
I dont understand the relatively low average score (37). I am from the UK, never watch or follow US sports and got 44 just by thinking of it as largest US cities quiz? Puzzled.
These are the leagues with the vast majority of sports patronage. MLS can't surpass some high school football associations, much less NCAA or other comparisons to the leagues with the majority of patronage.
44/49 and I haven't watched any sports since the 90s, so I feel okay about it. Every single one I missed was in Canada, though, so I don't feel okay about that. It must be hockey.
i forgot green bay, cincinnati,WASHINGTON! and ottawa.
They have the Annaheim Ducks in the NHL
This list seems overpopulated to me, but I don't know much about sports or the corruption associated with it.
I wouldn't think that a city like Detroit would warrant 4 teams.
I think some of these have populations with very big crime issues, like San Francisco, Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, DC, Baltimore, St Louis..
Seems like they wouldn't have money to waste on something like corporate sports. I wonder if it's a new phenomenon to see such large metropolises in the modern world take downturns. I guess patterns repeat in larger ways as the global population grows.
Since 2000, Vancouver, Charlotte, Montreal, Seattle, Atlanta, Newark, St. Louis, San Diego, Oakland, and Phoenix have lost sports teams. Very few if any are linked to crime rates or corruption (expect maybe Oakland).
"C'mon man".