< tangent> This is something I've never understood. If orange has two syllables, then it's easy to come up with rhymes--lunge, grunge, etc--but if it is only one, then a good rhyme is more difficult, if not strictly impossible. However, many of the same people I know who claim orange has no rhyme will also assert that it's two syllables. < /tangent>
Reply to Platitude: Wikipedia says "two words rhyme if their final stressed vowel and all following sounds are identical". Since "o" is the final stressed vowel in (the two-syllable word) "orange", "lunge" and "grunge" do not rhyme with "orange".
@cpgatbyu: Completely agree with your definition of rhyming. My point is that if Orange is two syllables, then it has another stressed vowel, thus making it rhyme with lunge, et al. It's an odd word, sure, but people seem to want it both ways.
@platitude: "stressed vowel" means "vowel in a stressed syllable". Both syllables in "orange" aren't stressed, only the first. Hence, any word that rhymed with "orange" would have to end precisely with "orange".
@cpgatbyu, I can see your argument, but I still can't figure out a way to make 'orange' 2 syllables without stressing the a. I guess it is approaching the schwa though, so maybe.
@platitude: there's a difference between stressing (aka, accentuating) a syllable and pronouncing a syllable. Trust me, when you say the word "orange", you do not stress the a. You merely pronounce it.
OR'inj (only the o is stressed, while the a is pronounced)
Yeah, stressing the A in orange sounds awfully wrong. For the record, the second syllable is stressed in orangutang. Instead of saying “utang” after it, just shorten it to “orANGE”. It sounds so terribly wrong!
Yea orange definitely does not rhyme with lunge grunge, even if you would just want it to rhyme with the -ange part of the word.
If you try to pronounce orange as one syllable, you'd get something like onsh.
I wonder why people have such difficulties with syllables (though the difficulty for plattitude seem to be more with the rhyming) I have seen it a surprising number of times on this site, for words where I couldn't even imagine how someone could see it in a different amount of syllables. It is seriously astounding to me (and no it is not something like "I don't believe people didnt know this or that answer" because peoples interests lie in different areas. and the exposure is different, europeans cant be expected to know everything about america and vice versa for instance. So that is understandable.)
How is there disagreement? Can you find a dictionary that says it has only one? If you can, then there can be no argument, and if you can't, just remove it. I can't, but maybe you can?
I really cant see how people think it has one syllable. I can disagree with the number of syllables quizmaster has and say it is only one syllable. Just because I disagree with it, does make it so. Some things are just facts (like the amount of letters in the word tomato) and not open for interpretation (like pronunciation of tomato)
I wonder, is strawberry one syllable too? or banana? From now on I am gonna argue with everyone that claims it has more than one syllable. (Sorry if this comment comes of slightly agressive, if so I didnt mean to, but this is one just baffles me, it is one of the more crazy things that has been allowed on this site, just as crazy as someone claiming denmark, the country is in Asia, and including it, because there is one person that disagrees that it is in europe...)
I actually word understand it more if people thought it was three syllables, or-an-ge or something. But I really can't wrap my head around how they can think it is one, honestly,I cant see how they must be looking at it. To me it sounds like saying a cow is a bird or something, I have no idea why someone would say that and it is astounding to hear. (Unlike, which is still quite obviously wrong, when they think a bat is a bird, atleast in Thát case there is a reason where I can see their thought process took the wrong turn> In this case, I really can;t see it.)
Assumably, people from whatever state QM is from probably pronounce it “ornj”. It’s like how some people pronounce it “carmel” instead of the proper “caramel”, or some Americans say that a “ruhf” sits atop their houses instead of “roof”, or that they need to landscape the yahd.
While technically right, neither NY team has really been called by their "full names" in eons. All newspaper sport sections refer to them as Knicks & Mets and rarely say Cavs or Mavs.
If the intent was to list the answers in alphabetical order, you should put the Bucks before Bulls and Spurs before Suns. Alphabetical order sometimes helps me fill in the answers I'm missing based on what I have so far. And it just messes with my OCD for the rest to be in order except those two!
The timing is usually pretty appropriate for the quizzes here, but I totally agree with you on this one. Needs at least a couple more minutes; it's a LOT of teams to think through!
Knicks and Mets are referred to as Knicks and Mets on their jerseys and all official marketing and merchandise from the teams. The Cavaliers have a few jerseys that just say "Cavs," but their official home jersey has the team's entire name on it: there is nothing that the Knicks or Mets wear that says "Knickerbockers" or "Metropolitans," respectively. The Oakland Athletics are known as the A's, but their home jersey says "Athletics" on it, and the team's logo, while featuring their disctinctive 'A' also includes the word Athletics. Many teams have informal nicknames, from the A's to the Orioles being called the 'Os' and the Mavericks and Cavaliers being known as the Mavs and Cavs, respectively, but those nicknames are informal, while with the Knicks and Mets, those are the teams' names at this point.
The New York Mets full name is Mets, not Metropolitans. They got that name from the original New York Metropolitans baseball team, who were nicknamed the Mets. Knicks on the other hand is short for Knickerbockers. So I think that Mets should stay and Knicks should be removed.
I went through all the cities geographically and listed them then quit only to find a handful of the thousands of college teams were included. Oh well, I'm not wracking my brain for obscure stuff like that.
What do you mean by subdivision for college? I can think of Knights, Gaels, Pride, Tribe, Hawks, Stags, Saints, Flames, Sharks, Braves, Dons, Dukes, Broncs, Mocs, Waves, and Norse for one-syllable college teams. Maybe they don't all have football programs, but I would have to imagine some of them do.
1) Agree with those who say more time is needed. If it were not for college teams, it would be fine as it. But there are an awful lot of those. 2) Get 'orange' off of here.
I don't really know if the college teams belong, but if so, as others have pointed out, Knights should be added for UCF. Additionally, Flames should be added for Liberty and Dukes for James Madison.
OR'inj (only the o is stressed, while the a is pronounced)
If you try to pronounce orange as one syllable, you'd get something like onsh.
I wonder why people have such difficulties with syllables (though the difficulty for plattitude seem to be more with the rhyming) I have seen it a surprising number of times on this site, for words where I couldn't even imagine how someone could see it in a different amount of syllables. It is seriously astounding to me (and no it is not something like "I don't believe people didnt know this or that answer" because peoples interests lie in different areas. and the exposure is different, europeans cant be expected to know everything about america and vice versa for instance. So that is understandable.)
I wonder, is strawberry one syllable too? or banana? From now on I am gonna argue with everyone that claims it has more than one syllable. (Sorry if this comment comes of slightly agressive, if so I didnt mean to, but this is one just baffles me, it is one of the more crazy things that has been allowed on this site, just as crazy as someone claiming denmark, the country is in Asia, and including it, because there is one person that disagrees that it is in europe...)
Just as Cleveland is also Cavaliers, even though their commonly called Cavs.
Knicks and Mets are the same thing.