The Paris crash had nothing to do with the retirement of the Concorde. With only a single fatal accident, the Concorde had one the best safety records of any aircraft ever. It was retired because the cost of fuel made it impossible to fly at a profit. The Concorde used an afterburner to break the speed of sound, and spent more fuel taxiing than most aircraft due during takeoff.
It's irresponsible to say that Y2K predicted a disaster that didn't occur, implying that the threat was exaggerated. This is the way of thinking that leads people to say, "Quarantining was an overreaction because the experts said 2 million would die and only 50,000 died." Right. Only 50,000 died because of the quarantine, but people see it as evidence that the problem was exaggerated rather than that the mitigation efforts were successful. Y2K absolutely would have been a disaster for the banking industry and world governments, if not for thousands of programmers rewriting millions of lines of code. It's not that Y2K incorrectly predicted a disaster that didn't happen, but that it correctly predicted a disaster that was averted. I would rewrite it as "What computer bug predicted a disaster that was successfully averted?"
How is it a strawman? When you say that the prediction didn't come true, it implies that the prediction was incorrect. What else would one assume with no other information? I don't care how you rewrite it, but you can't leave it looking as though nothing was done and nothing happened. Action was taken, and that action saved the world.
A lot of work went into ensuring that problems were averted and those efforts were successful. The clue just says that it didn't cause major problems, which is correct
I agree with sumguy, the implication from the wording is that the prediction was incorrect. Also, some context helps. The general perception, it seems, is that the threat of Y2K was indeed non-existent and just paranoia. Leaving the wording vague enough that it can support that narrative means that, the latter being prevalent, it will support it in most people's eyes.
I disagree with you, you make it sound like the world was going to end, planes crashing all electric appliances spontanously combusting, bigger equipment going rogue and coming after people.. The great apocalypse, the world in flames..
Most likely if nothing had been done only minor problems would have occured, things that could be worked around and adjusted manually as long as you were aware of them, not total meltdowns. (basicly stuff they did beforehand now, correcting the system by " telling" them, no it is not actually a sunday today, but a monday, in the 21st century not the 20th)
Now this is a strawman. He actually said "Y2K absolutely would have been a disaster for the banking industry and world governments, if not for thousands of programmers rewriting millions of lines of code." Nowhere there does it describe or imply the ridiculous doomsday scenario you mention, which on the ohter hand is the typical exaggerated portrayal people use when making fun of, or minimizing, the threat.
Also, the consequences would have been bigger than something you can correct in a few minutes by just rewriting a few lines of code. A lot of automated systems work with inner clocks that, if incorrect, will mess their operations.
No it doesn't, and it's quite disingenous to say so. "Successfully averted" is far from what amounts to "the prediction didn't happen". The first points to the prediction being true but avoided, whereas the second points to the prediction being false.
What everyone else has replied as far as this being a straw-man. Also not really fair comparing it directly to the whole COVID argument. Let's keep in mind that states like Florida and Georgia that have almost completely reopened their economies have actually seen a decline in new cases (according to their state health departments) in the weeks since reopening, and that multiple other state health departments (as well as POSSIBLY the WHO and the CDC) have counted any death of any person who has had COVID-19 as a COVID-19 death, even if they died in a car accident or something. So there are definitely other factors at play here...
It seems to me that the type of faster-than-sound aircraft is an SST. The Concorde and the Tupolev TU-144 were types of SSTs but the type of aircraft was a supersonic transport. I claim no expertise in this area, I just remember when they first came out we always referred to them as SSTs and the Russians were vying with the Europeans to get the first one in the air.
Man, 2000 was a lot worse than I remember. George W. Bush, Putin, Concorde crash, Dot-Com Bubble burst, Second Intifada, Coldplay released their first album . . . yikes.
Tried that too at first. When it didn't work, I tried 2000bug, still with no success. Then I put "year" in front of that and, lo and behold - Y2K appeared!
Soft Rock... I mean they've got guitars, bass, drums and a lead singer. They've developed into pop status now but the music is still technically melodic/alternative/smooth rock or however you want to call it.
It's crazy to think how different things would be if Gore were awarded 600 more votes in Florida. He becomes president instead of Bush, which keeps the Democratic party content and more to the center (because they're not pushing left in opposition to Bush), and Obama probably never becomes president, which means the right doesn't lose its damn mind, and Trump probably isn't president now. I realize this is all idle speculation, but I think we'd live in a very different world now if it were President Gore.
Among other things we likely would've never gone into Iraq, more efforts to reduce climate change would have gone through, and the 2008 recession might not be as bad as it was.
Fair enough, but I shudder to think what would happen if the Green New Deal were actually law. Also remember we had eight years of Obama, who enacted very similar policies to what Gore probably would've.
Right, but Obama's policies are not the issue. It's what he represented as a young and charismatic black leader. I'm not suggesting his positions were above reproach, but a lot of the blowback against him from the right was based on fear-mongering and incoherent nonsense. Obama's policies engendered a much more extreme reaction than they would have if the same policies had been enacted by Gore. No birtherism. No cries of an impending socialist revolution. No accusations of a covert Muslim hellbent on the destruction of America. And those were the battle cries that led us to Trump. So, yeah, things would be totally different if Gore were elected.
I never heard the Millennium Bug referred to as anything else at the time, certainly not Y2K. Could have been referred to as the 'big con' - how the IT industry made itself millions by overhyping a problem that never was. Cool if you were in on it I suppose. I still remember a supplier of the company I was working for being asked by some outraged waver of a clipboard who couldn't believe anyone could possibly refuse to waste thousands of pounds and hours on 'fixing' a non-problem "What are you going to do if you come back to work on Jan 2nd and find all your computers don't work?' - and the reply totally silencing the nitpicker ''Buy some new ones that do'' !!
I feel like the world needs to redefine what the term rock music means, in such a way that doesn't include Coldplay. They're about as far from rock as you can be while still playing a guitar.
Not liking Coldplay doesn't make them not rock. Coldplay being popular doesn't make them not rock. Of course I am referring to their earlier music such as Violet Hill or Viva la Vida. Rock is such a broad genre it's virtually meaningless now. Subgenres such as soft-rock, pop-rock, or folk-rock are much more useful.
Most likely if nothing had been done only minor problems would have occured, things that could be worked around and adjusted manually as long as you were aware of them, not total meltdowns. (basicly stuff they did beforehand now, correcting the system by " telling" them, no it is not actually a sunday today, but a monday, in the 21st century not the 20th)
Also, the consequences would have been bigger than something you can correct in a few minutes by just rewriting a few lines of code. A lot of automated systems work with inner clocks that, if incorrect, will mess their operations.
If you're writing one of those you know the answer, just not the exact word.
Like an idiot, I tried "genealogy" which is not quite right however.
and Wikipedia recognizes it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2000_problem