Europe and Asia are the same continent if you go off of geographic fact. Their division is entirely due to culture, which Cyprus fits far better on the European side of.
Replying to Carto, though, Asia and Europe started as geographic terms. The Greeks called everything to the east of the Aegean Asia and to the west Europe. If you look at maps that the Romans drew, you can see why they used the Aegean.
No, gandalf, it's just correct. You don't realise it yet. This is a mainly geography-based website, so the continent it is in is defined geographically. It is culturally part of Europe, yes, and it is in the EU, but that has absolutely no bearing on where it sits geographically. It's in Asia geographically. While it is closer to Africa than both Asia and Europe, practically no one says Cyprus is an African country.
Turkey is in NATO; Australia, Morocco, Israel, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia, and Lebanon have or can participate in Eurovision; Israel, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey are part of UEFA; and Australia is part of the Asian Football Conference. Just because a country is a member of something doesn't mean that it is located in that region.
@YellowJacket I completely agree with that argument. No one is saying Jordan is part of Europe yet Eurovision can make them "culturally similar" to Europe. Also if you look at Cyprus only the Southern/Greek part of Cyprus is culturally European, not the Northern/Turkish region which is culturally Asian.
I do and Cyprus is officially in Mars, except for Northern Cyprus where they get sent to Pluto. We will also ship Akrotiri and Dhekelia to the Pacific to live along Nauru, where it is rightfully in Oceania.
But like most of these cases of inexplicable rankings it comes down to the odd use of PPP. Saudi has a famously low cost of living... cheap (heavily subsidized gasoline), cheap housing, cheap food, probably priced in-part so that the many Bengali/Yemeni/Pakistani slave laborers in the country can afford to eat once in a while. It's also a huge spread-out country with many very poor people living in desert and rural areas and small villages. On the other hand 83% of Kuwaitis live in Al-Kuwayt, aka Kuwait City, and Kuwait City can be an expensive place to live. It would certainly appear that way measured in terms of the random basket of goods they use to determine PPP. But the people there are not poor. Virtually zero Kuwaiti citizens live in poverty. And while Kuwait has its share of poorer ex-pats, having known many in both places, the ones in Kuwait are better off. It's impossible with 1st hand experience to see these rankings as anything other than flawed.
Kuwait is strange. Georgia... not strange at all. Beautiful country. Lovely people. Delicious food. Interesting architecture. Open-minded women. Breathtaking landscapes. But... next to Kuwait pretty dirt poor. The worst highway I've ever been on in my life was one of the roads between Tbilisi and Yerevan.
it's due to life expectancy and high levels of education. if they factored in gender equality, climate, human rights, or the ability to eat bacon, then it wouldn't be so high
Saudi Arabia Quality Of Life?! Seriously?! It was in the news yesterday that a teenager got arrested for doing the Macarena for crying out loud. And I'm sure women are loving life in Saudi Arabia as well...
It's a very short list of things they factor. Life expectancy (Saudi Arabia's is 74.5, equal to Bulgaria and Georgia; higher than Lithuania, Belarus or Russia), income (Saudi Arabia's PPP GDP per capita is 10th highest in the world), and education (having worked in the education sector in the country I know firsthand that Saudi education is a complete joke, but a high percentage of Saudis have cheated their way to tertiary degrees).
If they factored things like... gender equality, climate, sexual freedom, entertainment venues, condition of expat slave laborers, human rights, press freedom, or availability of quality pork products then Saudi would of course rocket straight to the bottom of the list.
Maaayyybe we could use this for quality of life rankings ("Beyond the essential ideas of broad access to food and housing, to quality education and health care, to employment that will sustain us, quality of life may also include intangibles such as job security, political stability, individual freedom, and environmental quality")
One of my uncles moved from Bangladesh to Saudi Arabia in the '90s. Since he was a doctor, he didn't have many problems personally, but he knew a young Bangladeshi man working as a cleaner who was mistreated to the point of physical abuse and forced to work outside in the scorching heat without rest. Luckily, my uncle knew someone with connections to people pretty high up in the Health Ministry, and I think he was able to secure that man's passage out of the country (or at least get him a better job).
Sadly, most laborers in Saudi Arabia aren't lucky enough to have those opportunities/connections and are stuck there permanently.
Frequently, work conditions are horrible, pay is offensively low, condition of accommodations is unacceptable, racism and abuse is omnipresent, employers and sponsors are dishonest and exploitative, and contracts are reneged immediately after the expat worker arrives in the country when their passport is confiscated and they are forced to sign a new worse contract.
But... it's pretty rare that these people get stuck in the country permanently. Unless they are refugees. Or if they try and skip out of their contract or escape from abuse and their sponsor reports them as delinquent. Then they often end up living under bridges in Jeddah waiting for years or decades for the worthless legal system to resolve the issue.
However, if you accept the abuse and maltreatment, and stick out the crap contract that you were forced to sign, then even poor Bengali and other expat laborers in the country do eventually have the option of being sent home. Usually after 2, 3, or 5 years.
Many choose not to because, as horrible as all of the above is, the situation in Bangladesh or Yemen or some of the other countries they come from is even worse.
Sometimes they end up kidnapped or trafficked, though. That does happen...
As soon as it said "Using standard JetPunk definitions of continent boundaries - don't be a whiner" I knew Cyprus was on here - why else do people whine about what continent is or isn't in Asia?
I'm sorry, but I'm going to whine about the standard JetPunk definitions of continents. My arbitrary system for dividing countries into continents is better than your arbitrary system for diving countries into continents!
If the UK Brexits, then it's not European? EU membership and Eurovision contest are not good arguments that a place clearly east of the Asian part of Turkey is not Asian. Why is it bad to be considered Asian? Why so much passion about it?
Actually Cyprus is common called a transcontinental country (same as Kazakhstan, Russia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, all European-Asian countries) so in these type of quizzes Cyprus should always be given by the author, to avoid confusion.
And that is by continent definitions.
If you try to go with the plates:
Remember Iceland is mostly on North American plate and everyone says they're Europe.
Malta is on African plate and everyone says it is Europe.
Even my country, Portugal, have territory on North American Plate (Azores) and African Plate (Madeira) and it's Europe.
Take in account that continents, even if continents are a geographical definition, they are in true fact a cultural construct (especially if we are talking about Europe and Asia, that stand in the same plate). So, if all this is a cultural construct: Cyprus stands on Europe; as culturally they are closer to Europe than any other continent (same as Iceland and Malta, that stand in other plates).
no one else going to ask about Taiwan’s different source? ok, i’ll bite: QM, i’m guessing it’s because Taiwan isn’t in the UN that you couldn’t use UN statistics, but what was the alternative source?
Wow. Just wow. I was trying so hard but didn't get any right. Then I got Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Cyprus, UAE and Israel and thought 'well...if that's what you consider Africa...'
Ran out of time, saw the results and was like 'WTF? Singapore? in Africa?'......then I saw the title of the quiz.....woooooops :D
I know very little about Qatar, but I would assume it's similar to the situation in Saudi Arabia, which kalba talked about extensively in the other comments here.
You can actually sort the top 10 in 3 categories : offshoots from Europe (Cyprus, Israel), petro-monarchies (KSA UAE Qatar Bahrain, Brunei was also in this category) and East Asian developped countries (Japan Korea Taiwan Singapore, I assume HK would be there too if independant).
It's a ludicrous exageration to call it a genocide. You do realize that a genocide is a planned extermination, right ? Look at the Holocaust for the textbook example.
Even before recent developments, many supporters of Palestine would have said that the IDF is carrying out a planned extermination.
I won't touch on this case in particular, but it's important to remember that genocidal governments *and* non-genocidal governments on all sides have very often downplayed the intentions of political violence since WWII, because genocide is now internationally considered to be bad, and acknowledging something as genocide would suggest that action should be taken. Look to how the Clinton administration (and the global community in general) responded to the Rwandan genocide for an example of this.
Many, many genocides since the Holocaust have been covert about it. China isn't destroying ethnic minorities– its merely protecting its "national security". Turkey is simply "defending itself" against rebels in the southeast. Russia is "de-Nazifying" Ukraine. You don't need the Hitler of the day to publicly announce his true intentions for a genocide to happen.
This website does not consider Taiwan as part of (the People's Republic of) China, as Taiwan is completely independent, has been for decades, and continues to have relations with many of the nations that officially pretend it doesn't exist.
https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/
(even though they are one of the top executioners in the world)
If they factored things like... gender equality, climate, sexual freedom, entertainment venues, condition of expat slave laborers, human rights, press freedom, or availability of quality pork products then Saudi would of course rocket straight to the bottom of the list.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/quality-of-life-rankings
Sadly, most laborers in Saudi Arabia aren't lucky enough to have those opportunities/connections and are stuck there permanently.
But... it's pretty rare that these people get stuck in the country permanently. Unless they are refugees. Or if they try and skip out of their contract or escape from abuse and their sponsor reports them as delinquent. Then they often end up living under bridges in Jeddah waiting for years or decades for the worthless legal system to resolve the issue.
However, if you accept the abuse and maltreatment, and stick out the crap contract that you were forced to sign, then even poor Bengali and other expat laborers in the country do eventually have the option of being sent home. Usually after 2, 3, or 5 years.
Sometimes they end up kidnapped or trafficked, though. That does happen...
So there...
And that is by continent definitions.
If you try to go with the plates:
Remember Iceland is mostly on North American plate and everyone says they're Europe.
Malta is on African plate and everyone says it is Europe.
Even my country, Portugal, have territory on North American Plate (Azores) and African Plate (Madeira) and it's Europe.
Take in account that continents, even if continents are a geographical definition, they are in true fact a cultural construct (especially if we are talking about Europe and Asia, that stand in the same plate). So, if all this is a cultural construct: Cyprus stands on Europe; as culturally they are closer to Europe than any other continent (same as Iceland and Malta, that stand in other plates).
Ran out of time, saw the results and was like 'WTF? Singapore? in Africa?'......then I saw the title of the quiz.....woooooops :D
You can actually sort the top 10 in 3 categories : offshoots from Europe (Cyprus, Israel), petro-monarchies (KSA UAE Qatar Bahrain, Brunei was also in this category) and East Asian developped countries (Japan Korea Taiwan Singapore, I assume HK would be there too if independant).
I won't touch on this case in particular, but it's important to remember that genocidal governments *and* non-genocidal governments on all sides have very often downplayed the intentions of political violence since WWII, because genocide is now internationally considered to be bad, and acknowledging something as genocide would suggest that action should be taken. Look to how the Clinton administration (and the global community in general) responded to the Rwandan genocide for an example of this.
Many, many genocides since the Holocaust have been covert about it. China isn't destroying ethnic minorities– its merely protecting its "national security". Turkey is simply "defending itself" against rebels in the southeast. Russia is "de-Nazifying" Ukraine. You don't need the Hitler of the day to publicly announce his true intentions for a genocide to happen.
-Open a new tab
-Go to Google Maps
-Find Cyprus
-Look at where it is
You can match Israel and the Taliban.
Both took over a country through brutal genocide.
There is only PALESTINE 🇵🇸