I manually calculated these in Inkscape. The number is based on how much land you would have to add or subtract from the state to make it into a perfect, unrotated, rectangle.
Technically Colorado is not a rectangle. It actually has 697 sides. But it looks like a rectangle when you zoom out far enough. Wyoming also has extra sides.
Or something... You can't put a rectangle on a globe, nor on an uneven surface (mountains). Colorado's boundaries were originally defined along lines of longitude and latitude, but after much surveying, its boundaries are now defined by 697 survey markers, connected by straight lines.
Some people claim that the "Four Corners" monument is actually in the wrong place by a couple miles because the survey markers on the state borders don't align perfectly with the straight lines which were originally intended.
However, at some point, the official borders were changed to be defined by the survey markers. As a result, the official borders of these western states are not perfectly straight. The Four Corners monument is, by definition, in the right place.
I don't know if it's similar, but on the Manitoba-Saskatchewan border, there are "correction lines." With north-south borders, you'd have to choose between straight lines that pay no attention to one-mile roads, or do this. This is done even beyond the prairies and their one-mile roads. Thus, to get to Saskatchewan from Flin Flon, Manitoba, you typically go south.
When talking about the American-Canadian border it also has hundreds of individuals sides/lines because they were basically marking off most of North America without knowing where to go other than due west. So while the border is on a parallel, the actual markers can be as off as a few hundred yards. (Likely no more than a kilometer)
If you zoom in to the Utah-Colorado border just north of Four Corners, you'll notice that Utah suddenly juts out like 100-something feet to the east to match up with the monument area. It was a very OCD-triggering discovery. (This was not to disprove what you said, it was to add something)
Wow, Pennsylvania? I didn't expect my state to be on here. In supposed it is pretty rectangular, but it also has such a jagged border. With QuizMaster's methodology though, I suppose it makes sense.
Interesting. Utah looks like two rectangles melded together but I didn't consider the entirety as resembling a rectangle. I would have thought Connecticut comes closer to a complete rectangle with the exception of the "tail" on the lower west side.
Connecticut's panhandle does extend pretty far south relative to the eastern part of the state (about 25 miles) which is quite a bit for such a small state.
Florida has a pretty big tail, Michigan is pretty spread out, Texas has quite a difference between the top of the panhandle and Brownsville with a large amount of the Gulf of Mexico cutting out more of the eastern portion of the state, Idaho is very wide at the bottom and narrow at the top, and Maryland and West Virginia are both oddly shaped with various panhandles. I would also think the Aleutians extending for over 800 miles past where Wales, Alaska would be if it were on the islands (Wales is northwest of Nome but if you drew a line down to the Aleutians, Attu Island is about 800 miles west of this point).
I'm sorry, this is bogus lol. Oregon has a huge hump on top. I suggest putting the way you figure rectangles in the description, as I never open the comments before taking the quiz for concern over reading answers accidentally. Thanks.
Barely got Pennsylvania at the last second. I can't believe connecticut and Montana didn't make the cut, I thought they were really rectangular. Anyway, fun quiz!
I got Oregon at the last second, not sure why I said Pennsylvania before I tried Oregon lol and thought it [PA] wasn't gonna be on the list half-way through typing but figured might as try at that point.
Quizmaster addressed this, if you read his comments on his methodology for this and his reply to someone else with this question, he says Connecticut was in the low 80%
Some people claim that the "Four Corners" monument is actually in the wrong place by a couple miles because the survey markers on the state borders don't align perfectly with the straight lines which were originally intended.
However, at some point, the official borders were changed to be defined by the survey markers. As a result, the official borders of these western states are not perfectly straight. The Four Corners monument is, by definition, in the right place.
If you zoom in to the Utah-Colorado border just north of Four Corners, you'll notice that Utah suddenly juts out like 100-something feet to the east to match up with the monument area. It was a very OCD-triggering discovery. (This was not to disprove what you said, it was to add something)
Take a look at the state border south of Chromo, CO. ;)
-->add connecticut