1) as has been pointed out in other quizes, you should accept the spelling "Magna Charta" - I know that in the
English speaking world, the standard version nowadays is Magna Carta, but the original Latin spelling of the word for paper is "charta" (hence the english "charter"). "Carta" is a Medieval alternative spelling, so it is probably more fitting, but "Magna Charta" is used quite often on older scholarly literature.
2) it is not accurate to say the Venice conquered Constantinople in 1204 - it was a large coalition of western European Catholic powers of which Venice was but one among the participants, and by no means the most militarily significant ones (although it was indeed a major source of funds for the enterprise). Constantinople was never subjected to Venice - a new "Latin Empire" was set up there, under French cultural and political influence, before it was re-conquered by the Byzantines at the end of the century.
From Wikipedia: "the first written appearance of the term was in 1218: 'Concesserimus libertates quasdam scripts in magna carta nostra de libertatibus' and also: "From the 13th to the 17th centuries, only the spelling "Magna Carta" was used. The spelling "Magna Charta" began to be used in the 18th century but never became more common despite also being used by some reputable writers."
Good film but totally inaccurate historically. They could have added a stop motion dog and called it William Wallace and Gromit and it wouldn't have made much difference.
Only thing is he was actually Welsh , which is known and even accepted in Scotland now .William Wallace means William of Wales , the Stirlingshire Welsh is part of Scotland where Welsh celts lived in 13th century . And longshanks never conquered Wales , Gwynedd , Powys etc fought each other . As is the same in less ferocity today , Wales and it's regions fought for whoever paid against other Welsh regions ,. Because longshanks had the act of union signed meant zero ,only in england was it seen as anything bar what it was
I think this is the first of these centuries quizzes where I missed one. Couldn't believe when I saw the answer... Westminster... of course.. d'oh. Almost missed Switzerland, too.
Regarding Westminster Abbey, I thought Edward the Confessor (in the 11th century) was the king responsible for starting construction on that Abbey. Or is the version we see today started in the 13th century?
True, and referring to him as "Aquinas" makes no more sense than referring to an earlier saint as "Hippo"! I typed in "Thomas" alone, and gave JetPunk a couple seconds to get it right--and then reluctantly added the "of Aquino" bit. Sigh.
I see that philosophical texts do now refer to "Aquinas' teaching on...," but in the interests of accuracy, a lost cause is worth fighting for.
I tried Thomas right off the bat and without that being taken, I was stumped and the years of Catholic School education went out the window. I added the rest of his common name a few minutes later when I tried all the other Doctors that I remembered even ones that came almost a millennia before and was out of ideas. Maybe add a note that you need his full common name not just his Christian Name?
The Yuan Dynasty was formed in 1271 by Kublai Khan. However, it only conquered the Song Dynasty after troops entered Lin'an in 1276. The last remnant of Song forces was conquered in 1279. So I think you should change the date to 1276.
1) as has been pointed out in other quizes, you should accept the spelling "Magna Charta" - I know that in the
English speaking world, the standard version nowadays is Magna Carta, but the original Latin spelling of the word for paper is "charta" (hence the english "charter"). "Carta" is a Medieval alternative spelling, so it is probably more fitting, but "Magna Charta" is used quite often on older scholarly literature.
2) it is not accurate to say the Venice conquered Constantinople in 1204 - it was a large coalition of western European Catholic powers of which Venice was but one among the participants, and by no means the most militarily significant ones (although it was indeed a major source of funds for the enterprise). Constantinople was never subjected to Venice - a new "Latin Empire" was set up there, under French cultural and political influence, before it was re-conquered by the Byzantines at the end of the century.
You need to watch Braveheart, superb film
I see that philosophical texts do now refer to "Aquinas' teaching on...," but in the interests of accuracy, a lost cause is worth fighting for.