Before Newton, we would just sort of float a few feet above the surface of the surface. Some people would stop paying attention and drift off into space. It was rough. Newton doesn't get nearly enough credit, IMO.
I had plenty of time left so I just typed "ing" with every letter of the alphabet. I almost skipped q thinking that wouldn't be it. Glad I kept to the plan. :)
If you think this quiz is too Euro-centric, then please suggest a question we should add (and a corresponding question to remove). The explosion of science, technology, and culture in Europe that began with the Renaissance was unique in world history. That alone justifies the heavy emphasis on Europe. But the real reason this quiz is so Euro-centric is that at least 95% of our users come from a Western cultural heritage. It's only appropriate that this is what we focus us. Surely we wouldn't complain about a quiz on a Chinese quiz site being to China-centric?
My question: Why is it that when it comes to William of Orange, you refuse to "Willem", which is his name? - Or more correctly: Willem van Oranje. Yet you accept innumerable type-in for other names? Mao Tse Tung, Zedong, Mao, Qing, Manchu, Zhou, Quixote, Quijote...?
Are you sure there was a refusal? Maybe a polite suggestion/request would be appropriate in case it was simple oversight. It appears you don't have the perspective of what is involved in creating a quiz here. That might help you understand how such a thing could happen.
There's debate as to whether Galileo was actually persecuted, or whether he just kept stirring the pot until he caught backlash. A lot of scholars purport that noone ever thought the world was flat, but rather a clever ploy but Galileo to illustrate how ignorant the church were. The church were surprisingly tolerant of him despite his constant provocative treatises.
the Bible also suggests that the Earth is flat, but... as said, even the ancient Egyptians realized that that was stupid. Look up Flat Earth Society on YouTube to find some Biblical literalists who still believe in this.
Pascal and Descartes walk into a bar. Pascal says "I am the greatest mathematician of the day," at which point Descartes replies "I don't think. . ." and disappears in a puff of smoke.
Not necessarily. Most scientific and philosophical writers at the time did in fact write in Latin. Descartes's choice to write in French was active and explicit, he wanted to reach a wider audience
Is the Ottoman Empire really a "Middle Eastern" Empire??
Particularly at its "greatest territorial extent." Its capital straddled the Bosporus, though it was mostly on the Western side which is Thrace and firmly in Europe. The Eastern side is on the extreme northwest corner of Anatolia - Asia Minor - also known as the Near East. Only very recently and then only sometimes conceptualized as belonging to the Middle East, even though it probably shouldn't be. The Ottomans had extensive territory in the Middle East including most of the coastline of the Arabian peninsula and Iraq, but then they had substantially more territory in North and East Africa and also in Europe - pressing as far into that continent as Vienna, completely overrunning the Balkans and encircling the entire Black Sea.
I know historically the Europeans thought of the Ottoman Empire as "the Orient," aka the East, but to me it seems very odd to characterize it as Middle Eastern.
I might call it a Near Eastern, Eurasian, Afro-Eurasian, Anatolian, or Balkan Empire. I think I'd even call it a European Empire before referring to it as a Middle Eastern one. In the early 20th Century the Ottoman Empire was known as "the sick man of Europe"... not the sick man of the Middle East, or even the Near East.
A proper Middle Eastern Empire would be... the Babylonians, the Assyrians, the AlSauds, or the Persians. Some of which are what I thought of first. But then the clue didn't fit...
For the "Sun King" I disagree. Louis XIII died in 1643 but Louis XIV (his son) was to young to be king so the Mother (Anne d'Autriche) ruled the country with other people (like Mazarin) (because she is not alone do it alone). The age for a king to actually become a king is 13 so it is only at 13 years old that Louis XIV became king in 1651. So 1643 is a wrong date.
Can you accept "Authorised Version" for the KJV answer? Authorised Version or AV is what it is called in England where it was written. It is Americans who call it the KJV.
I'll see if i can find some links to endorse this
Particularly at its "greatest territorial extent." Its capital straddled the Bosporus, though it was mostly on the Western side which is Thrace and firmly in Europe. The Eastern side is on the extreme northwest corner of Anatolia - Asia Minor - also known as the Near East. Only very recently and then only sometimes conceptualized as belonging to the Middle East, even though it probably shouldn't be. The Ottomans had extensive territory in the Middle East including most of the coastline of the Arabian peninsula and Iraq, but then they had substantially more territory in North and East Africa and also in Europe - pressing as far into that continent as Vienna, completely overrunning the Balkans and encircling the entire Black Sea.
I know historically the Europeans thought of the Ottoman Empire as "the Orient," aka the East, but to me it seems very odd to characterize it as Middle Eastern.
A proper Middle Eastern Empire would be... the Babylonians, the Assyrians, the AlSauds, or the Persians. Some of which are what I thought of first. But then the clue didn't fit...