St. Joseph is traditionally viewed as a carpenter - however the word in Greek used to descripe him is 'tekton' which means more broadly an artisan or builder. It's not really clear what kind of material he worked with.
What I'm saying is it might be more accurate to ask what St. Joseph's profession was in common depiction. Or at least not inclued stonemason alongside carpenter, given there's an argument he was a stonemason rather than a wood-working carpenter.
Pedantic point, but the wording suggests that Bathsheba's husband was killed by David's soldiers. The biblical story, however, says that Uriah was put in harm's way and then abandoned, to be slaughtered by the enemy.
The Bible shows that God uses every to accomplish His will. Jacob was actually a terrible person that cheated his brother out of an inheritance and scammed his father in law. Judah slept with his Step mother, and Paul, killed more early Christians than many Romans. Just goes to show that God can use you even if you are a little or even very flawed.
The answer from Somequiztaker doubles as the answer to "how can evangelicals rationalize Trump?" Fascinating.
So: A candidate is a bit flawed and we disagree with the politics? "Stone him! Impeach him! Lock her up!" Flawed to the nth degree and totally against every moral law in the Bible but handing out candy in the shape of judges etc.? "Well, no one is perfect, God used Jacob and he was terrible too."
The Canaanites would be too busy melting babies alive as sacrifices to their god Moloch, the screams drowned out by drums so the parents wouldn't hear them.
Got the answer right, but wondering why it doesn't say he slept with and impregnated her before the whole, had her husband killed and married her portion of the story?
Slept with? Raped. If the king summons you to his bed-chamber can you really say no? If you can't say no, can you really say yes? If you can't say yes there's no consent. If it's not consensual, it's rape.
Rape not okay. If you study the Bible you will see that, and that there were bad consequences for David for his sin. Also that he was very repentant, and God forgave him.
For the last question, Joseph was already in Egypt. Jacob as head of the family technically led them from Palestine into Egypt. Joseph facilitated the move.
Yes, I got that wrong because I put Jacob who sent a "delegation" to see about getting some food and then the entire family went there in the end, led by Jacob. Not really accurate to say that Joseph "led" them to Egypt.
Catholics dogma does not teach that Mary ascended into heaven. Dogma says she was "assumed". A subtle difference but basically saying that she was brought into heaven.
I got stuck on this question for a little while too. I thought of Enoch and Elijah and then realized Enoch simply "was not, for God took him." That doesn't mean he ascended to heaven. However, in the Hebrew in 2 Kings 2:11, the Hebrew word translated in English as "went up" or "taken up" (as in "Elijah went up into heaven") is a form of עלה, which can mean "go up, ascend, climb." So technically, I suppose we could say Elijah also "ascended" to heaven, albeit with the aid of a whirlwind and fiery chariot.
Génesis 5:24 said: “Enoch kept walking with the true God. Then he was no more, for God took him.” God “took him,” that is, cut short his life at the age of 365, an age far below that of most of his contemporaries. Enoch was “transferred so as not to see death,” (Hebrew 11:5, 13) which may mean that God put him in a prophetic trance and then terminated Enoch’s life while he was in the trance so that he did not experience the pangs of death.
2 Kings 2:11 said: “[…] Elijah ascended to the heavens in the windstorm.” Racing through earth’s atmosphere, the fiery chariot evidently transferred Elijah to another part of the earth, where he continued living for a time. Years later, in fact, Elijah wrote a letter to Jehoram, the king of Judah. (2 Chronicles 21:1, 12-15)
This is in accordance with what the Bible itself indicates in John 3:13. Jesus said: “Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but the one who descended from heaven, the Son of man.”
Ah yes, the Bible. The irrefutable words of generations of monks who showed artistic license as they diligently transliterated and chronicled the writings of their predecessors.
There was a comment I left here, I think years ago, that was funny, relevant, and objectively inoffensive. It had been liked, and responded to positively by others, encouraging positive engagement with the site and comments section as many of my comments do. I saw that it was still here just last night.
Today, it's missing. It would seem odd, except that this seems to be a pattern lately. Noticing this more and more. Starting to feel very unwelcome here and once again like I should just go. If there's someone new in charge of moderating the comments section... they suck more than usual. If that's not it and this is coming from someone who has been around longer, I'd respect them a lot more if they just came out and asked me to leave rather than doing this passive aggressive BS shadow banning crap. I would leave if asked; not like I'm going to make a big stink, or take anyone with me, other than indirectly through the lower rates of engagement with the site.
on the off chance that it's the first thing (someone new), I don't know if replying to my own comment with the box checked to attract QM's eyeballs makes a difference or not... but... here
Not to be contrary since I don't know what the original comment was, but your comments on Bible quizzes are rarely totally inoffensive and non-inflammatory.
What I'm saying is it might be more accurate to ask what St. Joseph's profession was in common depiction. Or at least not inclued stonemason alongside carpenter, given there's an argument he was a stonemason rather than a wood-working carpenter.
So: A candidate is a bit flawed and we disagree with the politics? "Stone him! Impeach him! Lock her up!" Flawed to the nth degree and totally against every moral law in the Bible but handing out candy in the shape of judges etc.? "Well, no one is perfect, God used Jacob and he was terrible too."
Could it be that Elijah went somewhere else?
Scoring
You scored 15/15 = 100%
18.4% of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is 11
Your high score is 15
Your fastest time is 1:21
First try :>
Jesus Ascended into heaven, which means that He did so by his own power.
Enoch, Elijah, and Mary were assumed into heaven, meaning that they were taken up not by their own power.
The language here is more than nuance.
2 Kings 2:11 said: “[…] Elijah ascended to the heavens in the windstorm.” Racing through earth’s atmosphere, the fiery chariot evidently transferred Elijah to another part of the earth, where he continued living for a time. Years later, in fact, Elijah wrote a letter to Jehoram, the king of Judah. (2 Chronicles 21:1, 12-15)
This is in accordance with what the Bible itself indicates in John 3:13. Jesus said: “Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but the one who descended from heaven, the Son of man.”
So the answer to question 14 should be No.
Question 3 and 15 are in Quran too
I have studied #9 in an Armenian church in Iran ( where I am from )
Another questions : randomly
Today, it's missing. It would seem odd, except that this seems to be a pattern lately. Noticing this more and more. Starting to feel very unwelcome here and once again like I should just go. If there's someone new in charge of moderating the comments section... they suck more than usual. If that's not it and this is coming from someone who has been around longer, I'd respect them a lot more if they just came out and asked me to leave rather than doing this passive aggressive BS shadow banning crap. I would leave if asked; not like I'm going to make a big stink, or take anyone with me, other than indirectly through the lower rates of engagement with the site.
no idea how I saw that