It is pretty perverse not to allow Liberal as an answer here. It's not as though he was a minor player for a few years there. He was a member for decades and held senior ministerial position - including Home Secretary, and the First Lord of the Admiralty appointment.
I thought the defining characteristic of that speech was that it gave a laundry list of places the British would fight any invaders. Why, then, does "beaches" get credit, but, for example, "seas" does not? I mean, the Karate Kid fought on the beach, but you don't see anyone making memorable speeches about him.
Adding my voice to the (currently small) chorus of those saying that Liberal should be accepted, as he was a member of that party earlier in his career.
He sat in the Commons as a Liberal MP for 18 years representing Oldham, Manchester NW, and Dundee after defecting from the Tories in 1904. He took the reverse route in 1922.
I know that with Mr. Churchill's long and varied career it is impossible to put him in any single category - he was both Liberal and Conservative and had a voice in practically every area of government and their policies. While tanks were an issue with him he was also an early and very vocal supporter of using airplanes in military actions during his service as First Lord of the Admiralty.
Two men stand at a couple of urinals. One of them finishes the job and heads for the sink. This man is an old Etonian.
He washes his hands, and sidles towards the towel. As he sidles, the other man finishes the job, ignores the sink, and heads for the door. This man is Winston Churchill.
As Winston approaches the exit, the old Etonian cries out in an old Etonian drawl, ‘At Eton, they taught us to wash our hands after using the toilet,’
Churchill takes a puff of the cigar in his left hand. He exhales. And speaks.
‘At Harrow,’ he replies, ‘they taught us not to piss on our hands.’
I got it right, but Dardanelles should be an acceptable answer for which disastrous Turkish campaign got him fired as First Lord of the Admiralty. At the time the two terms were used almost interchangeably.
I'm assuming you're referring largely to the famines in the British Raj?
We should of course criticise Churchill and the British administration for such atrocities.
But I don't think it's comparable to Mao or Stalin.
Firstly, Churchill wasn't a dictator so the blame can't be solely placed on him. Secondly, it's pretty well accepted that the famines were as a result of policy failure. While not excusable, I don't think it was an objective of the British to kill people. Mao and Stalin on the other hand...
"We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender..."
Reducing this to just "the beaches" frankly is insulting. This isn't just the internet deciding, the complete quote is still well-known precisely for the many places that were mentioned. It's a spirit tragically but honorably seen in Ukraine today.
I'd also suggest accepting Blenheim Palace as his country estate - his birthplace and family seat if not his personal pad.
Agree absolutely, Alex. Whatever one's views on Churchill, that was a massively important speech and can't be redacted without completely missing the point.
And Churchill's family estate, where he was born, is Blenheim
History has deemed it such.
He washes his hands, and sidles towards the towel. As he sidles, the other man finishes the job, ignores the sink, and heads for the door. This man is Winston Churchill.
As Winston approaches the exit, the old Etonian cries out in an old Etonian drawl, ‘At Eton, they taught us to wash our hands after using the toilet,’
Churchill takes a puff of the cigar in his left hand. He exhales. And speaks.
‘At Harrow,’ he replies, ‘they taught us not to piss on our hands.’
We should of course criticise Churchill and the British administration for such atrocities.
But I don't think it's comparable to Mao or Stalin.
Firstly, Churchill wasn't a dictator so the blame can't be solely placed on him. Secondly, it's pretty well accepted that the famines were as a result of policy failure. While not excusable, I don't think it was an objective of the British to kill people. Mao and Stalin on the other hand...
Reducing this to just "the beaches" frankly is insulting. This isn't just the internet deciding, the complete quote is still well-known precisely for the many places that were mentioned. It's a spirit tragically but honorably seen in Ukraine today.
I'd also suggest accepting Blenheim Palace as his country estate - his birthplace and family seat if not his personal pad.
And Churchill's family estate, where he was born, is Blenheim