Technically, smart is someone who can perform logical operations, such as math or physics, not someone who merely remembers information, so more like "You're so good at memorising stuff"
I actually think British resistance to Napoleonic France caused more deaths than the actions of Napoleon himself, under his rule life for the average European improved immeasurably.
British resistance? What about the Russians, Prussians, Austrians, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch et al who resisted Napolean at one time or another, and who formed grand coalitions against France?
True, but a lot of them only did so at the instigation of or due to support from the British, and furthermore many deaths were caused by British interference rather than actual war (e.g. blockading places and thus causing food shortage is one example I can think of). It's likely a lot of continental regimes wouldn't have been able to get back up without British help, when Napoleonic rule was often popular (what with abolishing feudalism and independence as a puppet instead of direct subjugation and all that)
We had a pretty shitty aristocracy ruling over us, in some regards we still do, the average brit might've benefited from a changing of the guards.
Further more Napoleon never really attempted to invade Britain despite our pretty much constant attempts to undermine both the republic and French empire.
At least he rose up on grounds of skill, contrary to the legions of lords they like to bow down to on the grey island, getting free places in the House of Lords even today.
Then again, he did appoint his own brother as king of Spain.. so.. maybe not that different after all lol
I feel offended that 95% of people get the battle of Waterloo correct but that only 25% got the battle of Austerlitz, clearly the greatest and most influential battle of the war.
This is a US site, its main audience are Americans and British and their historical narrative of Napoleon is of course 100% negative i.e the stuff they are most likely to know are his defeats and how he was "short", instead of the whooping he distributed to almost the entire continent xD
Ironic that the UK and France seem to be natural enemies (The Napoleonic Wars, France's support of the American Revolution, et al) yet there is a tunnel connecting the two countries. Easier access for fighting troops perhaps?
I was watching an interview with Patrick Stewart online the other day, and he joked that this is why Captain Picard had a British accent, even though the character was French.
Countries close to each other often end up rivals with contentious pasts. They also often end up with interconnected transportation networks. There's nothing ironic about this.
Of course, everyone knows when you're above level 80 you should have infinite knowledge of the universe and how it works. Perhaps we have a slip in the cracks.
I'm British and there's been plenty of history at school and television documentaries and TV and film dramas about the period in my lifetime. The French Revolution, and the period following it, and the Congress of Vienna (among other conferences) are all covered to one degree or another in various GCSE and A Level syllabuses over the years. And then there's Sean Bean in the Sharpe series of programmes (plus the books).
The little corporal had everything to do with height, it’s just that the name itself was inaccurate (mostly due to a difference in french measurements and british measurements leading to either confusion and/or opportunity to smear his name)
I don't think he would have liked you saying that! His family was English and, like a true English aristocrat of his time, his view of the Irish was as a "nation of scoundrels".
It's sad that more people know about Waterloo or Trafalgar, than Austerlitz. The 100 day campaign was inevitably going to fail since Napoleon had already been defeated and he couldn't create a large enough army to face all of Europe. If he won at Waterloo then he would of lost soon after, it just happened to be Waterloo that he lost (all this and yet he still almost won at Waterloo). People that don't know better act as if Waterloo was where Napoleon got defeated and that the British were the ones who beat them, even though Napoleons real defeat was when the Russians, Austrians, and Prussians joined together and pushed Napoleon from Moscow to Paris all the while the British were still in Spain fighting smaller french generals. I feel that battles such as Austerlitz, Borodino, and Leipzig should be way more famous.
At the end of the day, most people care less about military strategies and more about landmark events. If the Napoleonic Wars ended at Austerlitz then more people would talk about it, but as it is, they actually ended at Waterloo, and so Waterloo is much more significant in the eyes of most people.
To be honest, the only reason I know about Waterloo is become of how often it comes up in trivia (on this website and more generally). I think there's probably a lot of factoids like this. For example, I really don't care who the first dog in space was, but "Laika" has been drilled into my head against my will.
You know, for the longest time I thought it was Napoleon ice cream, and just a couple years ago I found that I was reading it wrong, and that is was actually Neopolitan ice cream.
Animal Farm question is a little odd, in my opinion. It's a reference to his name doesn't really have anything to do with him or his name. Might as well have put in a question about Napoleon Dynamite.
"Little" Corporal, "Grande" Armee - two opposite adjectives preventing me from obtaining full marks (as a history buff l really should have settled for no less, especially on this topic). Oh well, at least l am pleased with myself for remembering George Orwell's "Animal Farm'.
Further more Napoleon never really attempted to invade Britain despite our pretty much constant attempts to undermine both the republic and French empire.
Then again, he did appoint his own brother as king of Spain.. so.. maybe not that different after all lol
One of the great military victories in recent history.
it is anti-authoritan and especially heavily anti-stalin, but not anti-communist.