It becomes less amazing if, like me, you are familiar of just how popular that name is among muslims and know that there are over a million of them in London. It is the most popular first name in the world, after all. Also, the fertility rate among the muslim population tends to be higher, and this is a question about babies born.
Many Muslims give their sons the first name Muhammad (or some variant spelling) but call them by their middle names. They may do this with more than one son. Birth registers simply look at the first word in the given names field.
Yes but the point is, the vast majority of Muslim couples have children. Not the case for many non-Muslims who choose to remain childless. So more Muslim babies to be named Mohammed (or one of its 400 variant spellings) than other religions/atheists/races. More Moes than Joes!
As a side note, here's a very interesting video about the names subject. It makes a solid argument that another, Christian, name could be the most popular given name on earth if it wasn't for linguistic variation: https://youtu.be/5O2Yjn3OXRk
Not that amazing. Plenty of right-wing nationalists use this particular statistic as a means of demonstrating that “the Muslims are taking over.” It’s simply that Muslims have a smaller range of names which they give to their children (often religiously acceptable names such as those found in the Qu’ran) and Muhammad is the most common of those. Muslims are still a minority in London, albeit a substantial one.
Surnames are a better gauge, Brown and Smith are 1 and 2, Patel (Indian) is 3, my own is 7 and the most common ‘Muslim’ name, Khan, is number 10.
It's less amazing when you look at the stats and realise in 2020 there were 56,886 boys born in London and only 705 of them were called Muhammad. Sure it's the most popular name but it only equates to about 1% of boys.
Question 2 is incorrect or at least where I'm from in the U.K it is. All of the supermarkets that I've been to e.g Asda, Tesco etc have the eggs in the refrigerated section and everyone I know keeps them in the fridge at home.
All the supermarkets I use in London keep them on the normal shelves, not in fridges. People often do not refrigerate them at home either, though many do.
The egg difference is due to different preparations earlier. US eggs are washed removing the cuticle and then need to be refrigerated. In Europe the chickens are vaccinated avoiding the need to wash the eggs, and keeping the egg cuticle but if it is refrigerated this can lead to mildew growth. As said above by kogatoa
Never seen eggs in a fridge in any shop in the UK. They're usually on the baking aisle with the flour. I keep mine on the worktop next to the toaster, but I might go retro and buy one of those ridiculous hen things to store them in...
hm.... got everything except for the Cayman Islands question... at first I was thinking of answering true but then I was second-guessing myself and thinking that they actually belonged to the Netherlands.
Muhammed is also the first name of probably more than half of the Muslims in the world today, a big part of why it's the most common male name in London. Virtually every culture has more common diversity in Male names.
I don't think anyone thought it was Lutherans driving up the popularity of the name Muhammad in London. But point taken that Muslims ought to be a bit more original when it comes to naming their male offspring, if that was part of the point.
I think originality is less of a concern for Muslim parents than the custom of using acceptable Islamic names. They simply have less names from which to choose, hence their most popular name is also the most popular male baby name. This statistic is often misused as ‘evidence’ for an ‘influx’ of Muslims which is neither a problem, nor particularly new. The fact that they are born here tells you that their families are already settled her, and for the most part they were very much invited. I would say that they are also mostly welcomed, but it’s not my place to welcome them, it’s their country too, as much as it is mine.
It always strikes me as odd that many of those that are opposed to conservative governments are so willing to not consider that the rise of Islam in the UK/Europe is a serious issue. They are far more conservative than the mainstream political parties we have. Anti-abortion, anti-LGBT, anti-free speech, sexists, misogynists, anti-science...the list goes on.
Why would you so willingly want people like that in your country?
@stusum, I don't think what you're describing is specific to Muslims. Conservative fundamentalist adherents of many religions tend to share those same regrettable biases. I live in the USA and I worry far more about Christian fundamentalists than adherents of any other religion.
@TomatosRaafatos, amazing video! I could guess pretty early on that the name "Yohanan" would end up being "John," but it was still surprising to hear how many variation it ended up spawning in other languages!
If you look at official baby name lists, Muhammad is not at the top. This is because it has about ten different spellings in English and they consider them to be different names.
For example, they also consider Carl and Karl to be different names.
Not really. The British constitution comes from a lot of different sources, from Magna Carta through to the Human Rights Act. The Bill of Rights is part of it but no more than that and its supporters were careful to claim that (even though it's now over three hundred years old) it just restated already ancient rights.
The Bill is still very much an active part of the law though. The Govt cited it against a case of mine in the Court of Appeal last year.
“You can be fined up to £1000 if you are caught without a TV license, but how would they know?”
They send people to properties to check for plugged in TVs if they have suspicions. As I understand it though no one is actually required to let them in or speak to them. I think they rely on people being unaware of this.
They used to show commercials depicting a van with a dish on top that goes around scanning houses for TVs. The rumour was that it was nonsense and no such vans exist, but I’m not sure.
Not sure how many people don’t pay it. I always have. It’s increasingly controversial though. In the age of streaming it seems particularly antiquated.
It's the same deal in Ireland, loads of people don't pay it, especially people in rental accommodation. A lot of those people aren't even receiving any TV channels and streaming everything so why would you pay?
The vans did exist, just type TV detector van into Google Images, and in the '80s I drove them as part of my duties at Royal Mail. Whether they actually worked in detecting is another argument, however just the sight of one on certain housing estates produced a rise in TV licence purchases.
BTW, the UK has 3 active volcanoes in its overseas territories; Mt. Michael in the south shetland islands, Queen Mary's peak in Tristan da Cunha and La Soufriere in montserrat. There is only 1 extinct volcano in the mainland uk though.
question number 8 is somewhat ambiguous because it could mean: the uk has a written constitution just like the us has a written constitution or it could mean: the uk has a written constitution which is similar to the us's constitution
Please can we have another 194 of these? One for every other country. I.e UK for the French, UK for Canadians etc? No need to change the questions. As a Brit it would do wonders for helping me get to the next level.
Surnames are a better gauge, Brown and Smith are 1 and 2, Patel (Indian) is 3, my own is 7 and the most common ‘Muslim’ name, Khan, is number 10.
Shows that I'm a true Anglophile or is it Britophile?https://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/3/31/1270051456691/UK-incomes-graphic-002.jpg
Why would you so willingly want people like that in your country?
https://youtu.be/5O2Yjn3OXRk ...
You all might find this video actually very interesting. I certainly did :D
Well, I've been thinking about moving across the pond. Is that a decent enough grade, British folk?
For example, they also consider Carl and Karl to be different names.
The Bill is still very much an active part of the law though. The Govt cited it against a case of mine in the Court of Appeal last year.
They send people to properties to check for plugged in TVs if they have suspicions. As I understand it though no one is actually required to let them in or speak to them. I think they rely on people being unaware of this.
They used to show commercials depicting a van with a dish on top that goes around scanning houses for TVs. The rumour was that it was nonsense and no such vans exist, but I’m not sure.
Not sure how many people don’t pay it. I always have. It’s increasingly controversial though. In the age of streaming it seems particularly antiquated.
'MERICA FOREVER🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸