Zeno's paradox is a classic philosophical problem that has been known and discussed for ages. I realize he's less well-known than Socrates, etc., of course, but his writings are still important. (I'm also a philosophy student, so...). But, regardless: if you don't know about Zeno's paradox, go look it up, it's really interesting. :)
Once I read up, I realized that I knew about the one where you can never arrive at you destination if each step forward took you only half the way as your last step.
It's always a strange feeling to go into a comment section to make a joke and find that not only was the joke already made nearly three years earlier, but that you were the one who did it.
Since quite a lot of ships are named after people, that would open a bottomless pit. I know that there is also a movie (and even a music album) by that name.
I'm actually surprised that only so few people seem to know the term Potemkin Village. Maybe it's just a german thing that "Potemkinsche Dörfer (Villages)" is a common phrase for something fake.
What about the famous Potemkin Stairs/Steps of Odessa? I've got a picture of my car in front of them in one of my quizzes... so named because they feature in a very famous scene in a very famous classic film the Battleship Potemkin.
Yet another instance of Kal plugging one of the oh so many places he's been at without apparent reason. The middle sentence of your comment could have been left out without affecting its validity. (Just start your blog already! I remember you talking about it below another quiz. I (genuinely!) would love to read it and learn more about your life. It really does seem fascinating. I just don't think the comments section of Jetpunk quizzes is the appropriate place for what (perhaps mistakenly) passes as boasting on your part.)
I don't think he's boasting, I think he just likes to share his experiences with the people of JetPunk. And they're interesting to read most of the time. Anyone who complains about his "excessive bragging" is probably just jealous.
You're probably right. And I'm not saying that Kal has no right to do it. I just don't see what it brings to the conversation. (I guess he could complain that my complaining doesn't bring anything to the conversation either. ;) )
:) and the reason I don't feel like blogging is, somewhat ironically judging by many of the responses I get here to comments I leave, because I feel like blogging is a bit vain and self-indulgent. And I don't feel like I've got anything that unique or interesting to say. ::shrug::
The comment here is what Jack said. I'm just sharing what I connected to the name Potemkin. I'm inviting someone else to comment that they, too, visited the steps, or saw the movie, or took my quiz... or inviting someone to click through and see the photo... or share their own experience taking the quiz. I'm not trying to boast. Just making conversation.
Fair enough. :) I guess we can call it a case of "agree to disagree"? In my opinion, a blog (or whatever platform you'd want to chose) would be a better place to share your experiences and discuss them with people who really are interested about them then Jetpunk comments sections. Mainly because I'd "chose" to read them instead of being "exposed" to them unwillingly. (And yes, I know I can chose not to read the comments, but can I really? I’d have to also renounce to all the other comments.) After reading your reply, I still don't get how mentioning that a quiz of yours has a picture of your car in front of some famous stairs invites anyone to share their similar experiences or brings something meaningful to the table. But maybe that’s just me…
And again, for the record, I am genuinely interested in reading about some of the stuff and travels you've done. Maybe that's why I can get a bit fed up about some of your comments: they're like teasers of something I'll never get to read or experience.
Precisions about the quiz (methodology, changes and such), quips and jokes (like Marlowe's pretty good one above), additional info on the quiz' subject (like the non-"picture of my car in front of the stairs" part of your comment)... I do find it really interesting when you share your input based on places you've lived in, as opposed to times when you only say stuff like "I've been to 13 of the 20 places on this quiz, so it was easy for me" without adding gravy to the personal feat. Does that make sense? (I realize my first comment might have been a bit arrogant. I apologize. I'm glad we can have a cordial discussion about it all. :) )
Incidentally, about a year ago I did finally start a blog. But I never promote it. And have actually taken steps to make it less visible. I have zero regular readers and that's actually how I prefer it.
Never heard of Rhodes Scholar. It's not a thing in my language, but givet over 40% of people got it, I guess it is in english. Still think that Rhodes Colossus is more known. 😀
Rhodes Scholars go to Oxford University, so English language speakers are very common, but Rhodes Scholarships have gone to people all over the world; Germany, Jamaica, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malta, Pakistan, Ceylon, Zimbabwe, Trinidad and Tobago, Kenya, United Arab Emirates, China and many others
Whether the Colossus of Rhodes is better known or not doesn't matter, as it's named for the island of Rhodes and not for a person. The Rhodes Scholarship, meanwhile, is named after its founder, Cecil John Rhodes.
The "named after" connection is too tenuous in my opinion, since they aren't named "Potemkin Steps" after a person.
Yes, they were named after a thing that, in turn, was named after a person (or maybe they were named after an incident which was named after a thing which was named after a person); but that's not quite the same thing. I don't think the quality of "being named after" is fully transitive.
Rhodesia was named after Cecil Rhodes. There's also the Rhodes statue on Oriel College, Oxford, currently the subject of much controversy because it should be removed as a symbol of egregious imperialism. Some of these quizzes seem to reflect current US-centric chauvinism!
Sure but "Rhodesia" doesn't fit, as the blank clearly indicates it's looking for a separate and not a two-letter suffix. The statue also doesn't really count, because it's not a statue named after Cecil Rhodes, it's a statue of him. It also seems weird to complain about US-centricism in regards to a question about a British scholarship.
Can you please accept Socratic dialogue/seminar/circle? I've never heard of Socratic method until now, but Wikipedia says that Socratic dialogues are an application of the Socratic method, so I feel like this (and the other synonymous options I listed above) should be accepted.
The bloody stains on the sidewalk were a memorial to my shoe.
I'm actually surprised that only so few people seem to know the term Potemkin Village. Maybe it's just a german thing that "Potemkinsche Dörfer (Villages)" is a common phrase for something fake.
I mentioned the Potemkin steps -----> There's a picture of them on a quiz I made
The comment here is what Jack said. I'm just sharing what I connected to the name Potemkin. I'm inviting someone else to comment that they, too, visited the steps, or saw the movie, or took my quiz... or inviting someone to click through and see the photo... or share their own experience taking the quiz. I'm not trying to boast. Just making conversation.
Yes, they were named after a thing that, in turn, was named after a person (or maybe they were named after an incident which was named after a thing which was named after a person); but that's not quite the same thing. I don't think the quality of "being named after" is fully transitive.