I unfortunately forgot about ambergris :( Question though: would spermaceti count for that question? I know it was used for a long of things but I'm not sure if it was used in fragrance or not.
You tend not to measure powders like toner in gallons though.
Toner itself isn't that expensive compared to ink, at least for how many pages you are getting out of a cartridge's worth (although laser printers and the cartridges can be much more expensive).
yup tried saffran saphran saffrane saphrane safran safrane...then gave up ( it hink, might ve tried again thinking i missed one). Usually when the word is written is one way in my language it is easy to predict how it will be written in english, often follows the same pattern. But here unexpectedly an o appeared
Do you mean dark matter? nobody knows what that is so maybe, but probably not - if most of the universe is antimatter we would see some pretty big explosions basically everywhere
For Aerogel maybe it means least dense solid. Pretty sure a pound of that and a pound of anything else weigh the same. I was guessing carbon nanotubes which are solid but very very small so would technically be the lightest. Even if you had a piece of aerogel that small it would be a lot heavier because the lightness is just due to it having it gaps filled with air and on a small scale there would be a lot fewer gaps (if any).
Does the ink question refer to liquid ink (typical for "jet" type printers), or powdered toner (typical for photocopiers/laser printers). Those are two distinct materials, and if toner is the intended answer, I would consider excluding "ink" as even a "fill-in."
In an immaterial, ineffable sense, I'm sure most would agree you're right. But the average wrongful death award in the United States is something like $500k to $1000k and if we assume an average body weight of 60kg, that comes out to about $12.50 a gram, which is worth less than silver, let alone most of these items.
Of course, my source data here isn't great--it's a ballpark estimate based on law offices' advertising sites, not a study (couldn't easily find one) and so it's very approximate. And you might consider valuing "you" this way to be odious or incomplete (note that the these awards are exclusive of other things that might be awarded like punitive damages or pain and suffering). But I don't think it's so far off as to be that inaccurate, and it is usually calculated with something like a systematic process, with standardized actuarial tables, etc.
That's only if you think you can assign a dollar value per pound on a human being. If so, is there a better way?
As such, it is a statistical term, the cost of reducing the average number of deaths by one.
I think that has even less intuitive corresponding to any person's notion of "value". But I thank you, because I doubt there's any very satisfying way of approaching this idea of value.
Toner itself isn't that expensive compared to ink, at least for how many pages you are getting out of a cartridge's worth (although laser printers and the cartridges can be much more expensive).
Of course, my source data here isn't great--it's a ballpark estimate based on law offices' advertising sites, not a study (couldn't easily find one) and so it's very approximate. And you might consider valuing "you" this way to be odious or incomplete (note that the these awards are exclusive of other things that might be awarded like punitive damages or pain and suffering). But I don't think it's so far off as to be that inaccurate, and it is usually calculated with something like a systematic process, with standardized actuarial tables, etc.
That's only if you think you can assign a dollar value per pound on a human being. If so, is there a better way?
As such, it is a statistical term, the cost of reducing the average number of deaths by one.
I think that has even less intuitive corresponding to any person's notion of "value". But I thank you, because I doubt there's any very satisfying way of approaching this idea of value.
Ruby looks like Rub-E.
Rubie looks like Roo-Bee.