dont know what you think is popmusic, but it is generally what is being played on the radio.
And @matthew07 pop music definitely has something to do with being modern. No beethoven would ever be popmusic even if it gets super popular and the entire world will love it tomorrow. That being said it doesnt mean that songs from several decades ago cant still be considered pop music. Modern yes, but not necessarily recent, as in the last couple of years.
I think of them as alternative, but point taken. There are a number on here though that could be considered not-pop. Hammer and Smith are rappers. Are the R&B artists here considered pop?
There is definitely merit to the notion that every generation thinks its music is the last good music, but I think pop music really has gone off a cliff since 2012 or so. Pop stars have always been about marketability, but it used to be about finding someone (like Beyonce or Madonna) who already had something people would want to pay for. Now the record companies just look for people who will fit into the mold they have spent 40 years perfecting. The production, songwriting, effects, visuals etc. have become so streamlined that the songs have no personality and are very disposable. It's all about finding the next "song of the summer" rather than just finding a good pop artist and getting them before the public to do their thing.
As others have mentioned, the selection seems odd - basically songs from 1990 forward, EXCEPT one from 1968?? Seems like a better approach would be to cover the genre from its beginnings to the present, OR break it into decades or eras.
It wasn't released as a single outside of a few regions (like the US) so that's a poor metric to use because it would fail by default. It likely wasn't released as a single because it was too long for the radio and most people already had the song because the album sold like hotcakes, making it to Number 1 in numerous countries (even it America it got to Number 4).
Despite not being a single in many regions it is their 3rd most popular song (based on Spotify streams where it has over 400 million plays), that makes it very popular.
I’m sure Noel Gallagher would have something to say about calling Oasis “pop” music.
Strictly speaking it’s short for “popular,” but has come to mean that bland, generic style of muzak that is all you ever hear on mainstream radio. It’s all “ooh baby!” and synchronised dance moves - only really popular with teenage girls (and others who ought to know better) because it lacks any musical depth, subtlety or artistic merit of any kind.
It is ANTI-music, manufactured, produced and sold on mass by soulless business people, cynically manipulating young minds. It is filth.
Oasis are literally the first example that comes up when you search Britpop. What do you think the pop stands for?
I like Oasis but it's not like they were playing around with time signatures or song structure, they stick to pop structures a lot of the time (not that there's anything wrong with that unless you're a snob, there's a reason it's popular).
Don't be dense. There are two different uses of "pop music." The former is used for all "popular music," songs of 2-5 minutes in length that follow the basic verse-chorus-verse structure. This would include the Beatles, Oasis, Nirvana, Green Day, etc. The second, equally common usage, distinguishes between music played by bands and "pop stars," who are obviously cultivated and manufactured in a way that prioritizes marketability and profitability over quality. Katy Perry, Britney Spears, Rihanna, etc. It's not a coincidence that the same six songwriters are penning the songs for all these performers. It's a formula.
You're acting like no don't know the second usage exists, when it's a very common meaning of the term. Oasis fits under the first meaning, but not the second.
And @matthew07 pop music definitely has something to do with being modern. No beethoven would ever be popmusic even if it gets super popular and the entire world will love it tomorrow. That being said it doesnt mean that songs from several decades ago cant still be considered pop music. Modern yes, but not necessarily recent, as in the last couple of years.
Despite not being a single in many regions it is their 3rd most popular song (based on Spotify streams where it has over 400 million plays), that makes it very popular.
Strictly speaking it’s short for “popular,” but has come to mean that bland, generic style of muzak that is all you ever hear on mainstream radio. It’s all “ooh baby!” and synchronised dance moves - only really popular with teenage girls (and others who ought to know better) because it lacks any musical depth, subtlety or artistic merit of any kind.
It is ANTI-music, manufactured, produced and sold on mass by soulless business people, cynically manipulating young minds. It is filth.
I like Oasis but it's not like they were playing around with time signatures or song structure, they stick to pop structures a lot of the time (not that there's anything wrong with that unless you're a snob, there's a reason it's popular).
You're acting like no don't know the second usage exists, when it's a very common meaning of the term. Oasis fits under the first meaning, but not the second.