Hm more like 10 I thought. And the germany one would be positive negative or neutral depending on who you would ask.
Nr 2,3,7 and 15 are definitely negative. And the coal one too, regardless of if you are for or against using fossile fuel. A big increase is never better. A decrease would be better.
Additionally the influx of synthetic drugs that are tens to a hundreds fold more potent than their natural equivalent. Things that a lot of people would have slept off are now not waking up from. "Clean" drugs are nearly impossible to find. Most are cut with cheap synthetic or livestock purposed drugs.
While not a popular topic, the increase in illegal border crossings on the US-Mexico border is partly to blame, causing an increase in availability of narcotics on the street.
By "Worldwide deaths due to AIDS," I have to assume the intended stat is the annual number of deaths due to AIDS (or something like that).
Because the way it's phrased, it could be interpreted as asking for the total number of deaths, which very clearly can only have gone up.
In a sense, yes, I'm being pedantic, and you could make the argument that "well, it's clear from context what is meant" but on the other hand: it is a trivia website. "Pedantry? Well gawrsh, Mickey!" Also: it feels like a tiny tweak that's easy to do and won't reset the stats or anything, so why not?
It's very interesting to me that the majority of quiz takers (first time at least) thought that the bald eagle population was declining in the US, which says quite a bit about our environmental perception... (not that it's unfounded, though)
I live in a location where for the first 50 years of my life, I never saw a bald eagle. Now I have not only seen them, there is a nesting pair in my small and very overpopulated county.
The Japanese culture, especially corporate culture, prioritizes career over family. The corporate environment there is not as accommodating for families as it is in the US, especially for women. The shrinking population due to low birth rate is a crisis that Japan needs to figure out soon.
I agree with @unimportant. Nearly every country has a declining birth rate. The U.S. birth rate is on a similar trajectory to Japan's – just a couple decades behind. Many countries have tried interventions to increase the birth rate. None have truly succeeded. Sweden and Denmark are NOT success stories. They both have sub-replacement fertility rates that are declining quickly.
Personally, I think (in the U.S.) we need to rise the child tax deduction to at least $50,000/year per child. That's not a typo. Maybe $100,000/year. We need to encourage our most productive citizens to have WAY more children and small measures aren't going to cut it.
Hungary is trying something similar. It will be interesting to see how it works. In my opinion, the fertility crisis is the #1 or #2 largest issue facing humanity right now (the other being AI).
fertility crisis ain't a crisis for anywhere outside the lowest birthrate areas, world population will keep increasing for some time
And for any one taking this opportunity to say OvErPoPulAtIoN no, thats not it, Malthus. World population will decline and the green revolution has kinda been workin so far. Learn DTM. Biggest threat is ai
While I don't know much about how this stuff work, I'm not sure how effective a tax deduction (even a huge one) would be for the many adults who do not want kids outright. Notably only 17% of the adults who didn't see themselves ever have kids cited financial reasons.
Maybe you wouldn't need to incentivize these people though; maybe such a huge tax deduction would be enough to incentivize those who do have kids to have more, to the extent that the crisis is resolved.
Does the US have an accommodating workplace culture for families? Here, it's known for not having a guaranteed paid maternity leave period, not having guaranteed time off, and having poor job security because of 'fire at will' policies. Japan has a poor reputation for overwork and being bad for female employment.
Most employers have paid maternity leave, and several individual states have mandated it. Most jobs also have guaranteed time off.
The "fire at will" thing is overstated. Sure, it exists in theory for most non-government jobs. However, in practice, the hassle and expense of litigation means that most professional employers are reluctant to terminate unless it can be done in a litigation-free way like layoffs.
However, if you're working a hospitality or retail job you're pretty screwed.
Thousands of nukes were dismantled. In fact, since the 1980s, decommissioned nuclear weapons have been a major source of uranium used in nuclear power plants.
This is entirely due to China, India, and a handful of other countries. Coal production in the developed world has fallen by huge amounts.
Nr 2,3,7 and 15 are definitely negative. And the coal one too, regardless of if you are for or against using fossile fuel. A big increase is never better. A decrease would be better.
The root cause is more speculative.
By "Worldwide deaths due to AIDS," I have to assume the intended stat is the annual number of deaths due to AIDS (or something like that).
Because the way it's phrased, it could be interpreted as asking for the total number of deaths, which very clearly can only have gone up.
In a sense, yes, I'm being pedantic, and you could make the argument that "well, it's clear from context what is meant" but on the other hand: it is a trivia website. "Pedantry? Well gawrsh, Mickey!" Also: it feels like a tiny tweak that's easy to do and won't reset the stats or anything, so why not?
Personally, I think (in the U.S.) we need to rise the child tax deduction to at least $50,000/year per child. That's not a typo. Maybe $100,000/year. We need to encourage our most productive citizens to have WAY more children and small measures aren't going to cut it.
Hungary is trying something similar. It will be interesting to see how it works. In my opinion, the fertility crisis is the #1 or #2 largest issue facing humanity right now (the other being AI).
And for any one taking this opportunity to say OvErPoPulAtIoN no, thats not it, Malthus. World population will decline and the green revolution has kinda been workin so far. Learn DTM. Biggest threat is ai
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/19/growing-share-of-childless-adults-in-u-s-dont-expect-to-ever-have-children/
While I don't know much about how this stuff work, I'm not sure how effective a tax deduction (even a huge one) would be for the many adults who do not want kids outright. Notably only 17% of the adults who didn't see themselves ever have kids cited financial reasons.
Maybe you wouldn't need to incentivize these people though; maybe such a huge tax deduction would be enough to incentivize those who do have kids to have more, to the extent that the crisis is resolved.
The "fire at will" thing is overstated. Sure, it exists in theory for most non-government jobs. However, in practice, the hassle and expense of litigation means that most professional employers are reluctant to terminate unless it can be done in a litigation-free way like layoffs.
However, if you're working a hospitality or retail job you're pretty screwed.
But European fertility is even worse than the U.S.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Arms_Limitation_Talks
It has been incredibly successful.
Thousands of nukes were dismantled. In fact, since the 1980s, decommissioned nuclear weapons have been a major source of uranium used in nuclear power plants.
You scored 10/15 = 67%
This beats or equals 47.1% of test takers
The average score is 11
Your high score is 10
Just behind the average