The war did not start with an assassination. The war started when Austria-Hungary attacked Serbia in 28 july, one month after the assassination in Sarajevo.
I agree with KoljiVriVoda. The war could still have been avoided after the assassination. It's when the diplomatic negotiations failed that the war began.
Did they or rather: did they failed by purpose? There was basically every year a new local war in the one or the other part of the declining Ottoman empire. None of them let to a world war. Not even when France seized Morocco against all international treaties. The Great Powers always refused to go to war, this time apparently only Britain and Germany tried to mediate.
Technically, the Austrian-Serbian war started on July 28th, as one of the many local conflicts of that decade. WW1 started when the great powers decided to clash, that is de facto on July 31st with the Russian general mobilisation and de jure on August 1st or August 3rd with the German declarations of war towards Russia and France, respectively.
Well, WWI began with the war between Serbia and Austria-Hungary, but WWII began with the war between Japan and China in 1937 imo (and following the same logic).
Let it be September 1st or September 3rd 1939, this conflict was exclusively located in Europe in these days (as was the Japan-China conflict in Asia). And also with a lot of major countries still neutral (Soviet Union, USA, Italy,...). Italy joining the war spread it to Northern Africa but arguably only the German attack on the Soviet Union and/or Pearl Harbour made this really a world war. There was quite some time between September 1939 and June 1941 for diplomacy keeping this conflict localised. (I am not arguing that it would be smart to cooperate with the Nazis, but yes official framing/wording is somewhat flawed.)
Bear in mind the size of the British empire in 1939 - the involvement of the UK inevitably dragged in a large part of the whole world, never mind where the fighting was.
There isn't an official date for WW2, as there are many times when it could've started. most agree 1939 but you could argue it was when germany annexed parts of czechoslovakia or anschluss happened, or if you really want to stretch it it could be when japan (maybe) staged a train bombing to have an excuse to attack manchuria or when they fought with russia for sakhalin
Well, to me Japan fighting China was a separate war that got absorbed into WWII later. And annexing land peacefully, regardless of the coercion involved, isn't war in my opinion.
Technically the war started after serbia rejected the austro-hugarian ultimatum but it can be argued that that ultimatum was purposely made too unreasonable so the austro-hungarians had the excuse to increase their national pride by going to war
Yeah, this is what matters. War--especially wars involving multiple countries--are really complicated, and it's impossible to point to one single moment as the cause of a war, but it's generally understood that the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was the tipping point and set off the subsequent events that ended in the war.
I think it'd be more accurate to say that the war started "because" of an assassination. As a history teacher, I'd never want a student of mine to say that the war started with an assassination because wars are started with attacks or formal declarations.
I was sure the Zimmermann Telegram was World War II. Hmph. Humbling. Otherwise, I missed the question regarding French soldiers. Seems fairly obvious in retrospect, but I know WWII had way more deaths overall and clicked without really thinking it through.
Battle of Bulge to Ardennes Counteroffensive.
I think it is more known on that name. Especially in non english speaking countries...
Scoring
You scored 18/18 = 100%
13.1% of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is 14
Your high score is 18
Your fastest time is 1:18